An Analysis of EU Military Presence on Armenia-Azerbaijan Border Area

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on Europe affairs commenting on the decision of the European Union to send about 100 police officers to Armenia to monitor the ceasefire on the border with the Republic of Azerbaijan, which has been violated many times before, said the decision may be more symbolic, but definitely it was taken with an aim of a stronger and more effective presence of the European Union in the Caucasus region.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Morteza Makki, an expert on Europe affairs, explained the background of the European Union’s role playing in the Caucasus crisis, adding: One of the old challenges after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which still remains as a problem, is the dispute between Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Karabakh region that the European governments tried to manage the tension between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Karabakh region within the framework of the Minsk Group under the joint chairmanship of the United States, Russia and France and with the presence of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia in the form of the European Security and Cooperation Organization. But due to the deep differences and alignment between the European, the US and Russian governments in the Caucasus region, in practice, the Minsk Group could not take serious measure regarding the management of the Karabakh crisis.

Makki continued: Of course, such consultations and negotiations had led to a relative stability in the disputed region between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, but with the attack of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Armenia and the capture of large parts of Karabakh, the crisis in that region entered a new phase and Armenia was placed in a weaker and more unstable position.

Referring to the consultations held by the Russians and Turkey, he emphasized that later a partial ceasefire was established in the Karabakh region, and Russia and Turkey, as countries monitoring the ceasefire, accepted a specific mission on the borders of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia.

According to the expert, at this point, the Russians assumed a decisive role in managing the crisis in the Caucasus region, but the crisis in Ukraine caused Russia to somehow distance itself from many crisis centers in the region and focus on the war in Ukraine.

Makki continued: On the other hand, Turkey also tried to play a stronger role in supporting the Republic of Azerbaijan and putting pressure on Armenia.

The expert on Europe affairs, commenting over the European Union’s decision to send 100 police officers to the Caucasus region, said: The decision made by the European Union to send observers to the Caucasus region is actually an attempt to fill the vacuum of Russia’s presence in that region and to support Armenia. It should be noted that the Armenian lobby is very powerful in Europe, especially in France, and has always tried to strengthen the EU’s measures against Turkey and support for Armenia in the decision-making process in the European Union.

He added: Of course, at this stage, when it has been said that 100 European policemen will be sent to the Caucasus region, this decision may have a more symbolic aspect, but it was definitely taken with an aim of a stronger and more effective presence of the European Union in the Caucasus region, and it can leave more effects on the development process of the region.

Explaining how Russia’s role will be in future, Makki said: Of course, even though the Russians are all focused on the Ukraine crisis, they will definitely not accept so easily that the European Union gain a strong foothold in the Caucasus region. Therefore, this region will become the scene of more serious competitions which, considering the increase in tension between Russia and the West on the one hand, and Turkey and the West on the other hand, can increase instability and tension in the Caucasus region.

According to the expert, the main players of the crisis in the Caucasus region are currently the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, but the two republics are trying to advance their goals in tension and conflict with each other with the support of other powers.

Makki explained: Actually, the Republic of Azerbaijan has always tried to have balanced relations with both Russia and the West, but it seems that, considering the sensitivities and support that European governments give to Armenia, they cannot continue this policy of balancing relations with Western countries and Russia.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading