Analysis of French Role in Developments of the Caucasus Region

2024/04/28 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on European issues said that France's relations with the Republic of Azerbaijan have become tense due to the dispute over the Nagorno-Karabakh region.

In an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations website, Morteza Makki said: France recently announced that it has summoned its ambassador to the Republic of Azerbaijan for consultation; Paris has also accused Baku of harming bilateral relations.

He continued, “The issue of tension between France and the Republic of Azerbaijan can be related to the historical roots and cultural ties between Paris and the Armenian community.” After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Caucasus region became a place of conflict between regional and transregional actors.

He added: “In 1994, after the Armenian separatists of the Nagorno-Karabakh region declared independence, it was only Armenia that recognized this independence, but regional and transregional actors such as Russia, America, France, and the Islamic Republic Iran each had their position.

According to Makki, at that time, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) attempted to manage the tension between Armenia and Azerbaijan within the framework of the Minsk Group, but what we witnessed in practice was an armed peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia for more than 2.5 decades. There was no development towards lasting peace between these two countries.

Makki emphasized: “Finally, in 2020, the Republic of Azerbaijan attacked the Nagorno-Karabakh region by using the opportunity of the internal crisis and tension in Armenia and annexed this region to its territory once again. After that and in the last three years, the main actors of the North Caucasus region tried to play a role according to the process of developments in the Caucasus region and the expansion of influence in this region.

Makki also explained Yerevan’s approach in this conflict: “In the meantime, due to the loss of the Karabakh region and the Russians’ lack of commitment to their agreement with this country regarding helping them, Armenia actually became more inclined towards the West.”

This expert continued: “On the other hand, Azerbaijan tried to stabilize its position in the Karabakh region by getting closer to Turkey and improving its relations with Russia, and sought to capture areas of Armenian territory for direct communication with the Republic of Nakhchivan.” “Baku’s approach has greatly increased tension in the region and has accelerated Armenia’s approach to Europe, especially France.”

Referring to the announcement by the Russians about the withdrawal of the peacekeepers of this country from the buffer line between Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, the expert on European issues said: “Currently, this region is in a new situation. The Russians are leaving the North Caucasus region after nearly two centuries. In this situation, France, considering that they are the most influential lobby of Armenians in this country, is trying to play a more influential role in the process of development in the Caucasus region through arms and economic support from Armenia.

He continued: “This issue has caused tension in the relations between Azerbaijan and France, and the French ambassador in Baku has been summoned.”

Makki also explained the prospects of these developments: “The future of the Caucasus region will face a new trend with the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Armenia, and each of the actors in this region will try to expand their sphere of influence in the Caucasus region; Turkey, France, America, and Iran are countries that each have special interests in the region, and we will witness the formation of new equations in the Caucasus region.

He emphasized: “Due to the conflicting interests of the actors in this region, the Caucasus will definitely move toward political tension and escalation.” In the meantime, France is perhaps the first and only European country that has always tried to have an important base in the Caucasus region.

Makki said about the reasons for France’s approach to Armenia: “The most numerous Armenian community is in France, which has a good financial and economic situation. They are trying to establish strong ties between France and Armenia by influencing the decision-making process in the French National Assembly and the French government. The French National Assembly was the first European parliament to condemn the massacre of Armenians by the Ottomans in 2015. This position faced a strong reaction from the Ankara government, and the chain of condemnation was extended to other EU member states.

According to Makki, “So far, Azerbaijan has been trying to have balanced relations with Russia, Europe, and the United States, but Ilham Aliyev’s policies towards Armenia have caused this approach of Baku to be challenged in the past few decades, and the recall of the French ambassador from Baku may be the starting point of these challenges.”

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading