Zionist Regime’s Ploys for Arms Aid to Ukraine, without Official Notification

2023/02/22 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: In the official positions of the Zionist regime, the fact that Israel limits itself to humanitarian aid to Ukraine and refuses to provide military aid to that country and has not allowed weapons containing Israeli parts to Ukraine by third countries, has been repeated many times. Regarding the war between Russia and Ukraine, Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen emphasizes that ‘humanitarian aid will be maintained. We will definitely take one measure, we will have less public words and we will prepare a report containing recommendations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the cabinet ministers so that appropriate policies can be set; in any case we will continue humanitarian aid to Ukraine’. Mahmoud Fazeli - International affairs analyst

Despite the remarks of the official authorities of the Zionist regime, “Ron Prossor”, the ambassador of the Zionist regime in Germany, announced that the Zionist regime supports Ukraine in the war with Russia on a larger scale than what the general public knows. The Zionist regime helps Ukraine but “behind the scenes and much more than what is announced”.

Initially, the Zionist regime did not agree to the delivery of weapons from its territory to Ukraine due to the fear of the deterioration of its relations with Moscow, and it plans to continue this policy. But some evidence suggests that nearly half of the 300,000 shells of 155mm cannon have been allocated to Ukraine and are currently being shipped to Europe for later delivery to the Ukrainian armed forces.

There is evidence that the US is using its stockpiles of 155 mm artillery shells in Israel, which are stored for military operations in the Middle East, for the ammunition needed by Ukraine. There are 300,000 rounds of NATO standard ammunition in those warehouses. Ukraine uses 90,000 cannonballs per month, which is twice the production capacity of the United States, and as a result, Washington has turned to the stockpiles in Israel. Those warehouses were created during the Arab-Israeli war in 1973, and the United States used to provide its army with the required weapons in the Middle East wars, of course the Zionist regime also has the right to use those ammunitions in a crisis situation.

Yevgen Korniychuk, Ukraine’s ambassador to the Zionist regime, also claims that “Ukraine will officially transfer from Israel the Israeli technologies with a smart warning system to counter missile and drone attacks. This technology is officially provided by Israel and I imagine that in a certain period of time we will receive this technology completely. The minister of defense of Ukraine, in his most recent positions, has also confirmed the published information about the promise of the Zionist regime to transfer the missile warning technologies to Kiev.

The spokesman of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Yuriy Ignat, believes that if Ukraine actually receives Israeli weapons, this will be very good news for the Ukrainian armed forces. If the member countries of the NATO treaty receive the relevant permits from the Zionist regime and have the right to deliver weapons and items produced in that country to Ukraine, this will be ‘very good news for us. Israel produces various types of military products and everyone knows very well that Israel is the leader in the world market of weapons and the variety of weapons with excellent technologies. I will not comment further on the published news because only a certain circle of people know what topics can be discussed’.

Michael Brodsky, Israel’s ambassador to Ukraine, announced that ‘security agreements have been concluded between Israel and Russia, which limit the provision of aid from Jerusalem to Ukraine. The limitations that have been created cannot be ignored. Most of the countries that supply offensive weapons to Ukraine are NATO member countries, but Israel is not a member of that alliance. Israel is a relatively small country in the Middle East that faces huge security problems. We use our military equipment almost every day, we are in the Middle East, which is one of the most unstable regions in the world, and we are always just one step away from the next war. In such a situation, the Zionist regime shows complete caution and thinks about the safety of its citizens and the security of its military personnel before anything else, for this reason, the Zionist regime has clear “red lines” that Kiev is well aware of’.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has so far supported Russia and Israel refused to condemn the annexation of Crimea in 2014, said in recent days: I will carefully examine the possibility of sending weapons to Ukraine and do this in line with the interests of Israel. The previous Israeli government rejected it. I will look into this matter and respond in an appropriate manner. The government will consider this issue according to Israel’s interests.

Russia has threatened that any shipment containing weapons to Ukraine would become a legitimate target for Russia and would receive a retaliatory military response from Moscow.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has recently announced that he is ready to act as a mediator in the negotiations between Ukraine and Russia if offered again by Ukraine, Russia and the United States. At the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he was unofficially asked to act as a mediator, but he refused to accept the offer at the time, as he was then the leader of the opposition, not the prime minister. He is now ready to examine the role of the mediator in the negotiations, but for this purpose there must be an “appropriate time and conditions”.

There are many politicians in the Zionist regime who have been attracted by Russia in various ways, and Netanyahu is not expected to suddenly change his attitude and criticize Putin. Any change in the positions of the Zionist regime is related to the pressure that the US can exert on its ally. But the Zionist regime can help Ukraine not only through weapons but also with equipment for energy infrastructure and supply of drinking water, food products and the similar.

The Zionist regime is very cautious about Russia’s attack on Ukraine. Despite the US request, the Zionist regime previously refused to approve the UN Security Council resolution condemning the Russian attack. The Zionist regime’s air defense was not given to Zelensky, and even Ukraine’s request to receive a helmet and bulletproof vest was rejected by the Zionist regime. Ukraine promised to distribute them only among civilians. Since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, no high-ranking official of the Zionist regime has met with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading