Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day. Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a "difficult situation" that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials. Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

The protests, which originated from Columbia University, the hub and base of the original “Jewish lobby” and now spread to more than 100 prestigious U.S. universities, echo the “Vietnam tragedy” and are reminiscent of the famous 1968 Columbia University protest movement that forced the United States to withdraw from the Vietnam War.

 

Columbia University The Origin of American Student Uprising

Harsh treatment, beating and arresting students, and efforts to contain the student movement are policies adopted by the U.S. government toward protesters. In this regard, the Biden administration, resorting to the “anti-Semitism” rhetoric, has made a ludicrous statement: “There is no room for violence and anti-Semitism on any campus in the United States.” These statements come at a time when Jewish professors and students are also present in the protests and even play a prominent role in organizing them.

 

The most important demand of students

The U.S. government’s “revision” in its policies of supporting the Zionist regime, stopping the Gaza war, and cutting or reducing economic relations with centers that provide weapons and money to the Zionist regime are among the main demands of the protesters. As the current trend continues, in the next few weeks, we will see a rise in students at dozens of other universities, and the possibility exists for more European universities to join the protests.

Recent student protests in the United States have messages and consequences at both domestic and foreign levels.

 

Messages

In fact, the student uprising in the United States and the way the U.S. government and police treat students in their essence contain reflective messages, the most important of which are mentioned below:

One: despite the widespread media manipulation of the events in Gaza, the recent protests showed that the U.S. government has effectively lost the ability to persuade civil society, especially the student generation, and contrary to the internal intentions of the statesmen and the circles aligned with it, the university has come to an accurate understanding and realistic assessment of what is happening in Gaza and the consequences for the United States.

Two: Student protests showed that the “gap” between the government and civil society, including the university and public opinion in the United States, is clearly so far away from the issue of Palestine and Gaza that media tools cannot conceal it. In this regard, a CNN poll is good evidence that 71 percent of Americans oppose Biden’s policies toward the Gaza war.

Three: Israel’s condemnation of the genocide in Gaza, expressing sympathy for Palestine, and calling for an end to U.S. support for Tel Aviv are the “loudest voices” heard in American universities. This means that the “popularity of Palestine” and “disgust with the Israeli regime” in the United States, which is the regime’s most prominent strategic ally and supporter, is on the rise.

Four: The violent treatment of the police, the detention of protesting students and professors, and the violation of the right to freedom of expression and assembly, in the most explicit manner, mask the face of American democracy and show the oppressive nature of the U.S. government and police.

 

Consequences

The recent protests at U.S. universities have significant consequences in both domestic and foreign arenas that should not be underestimated:

One: Despite the suppression of student gatherings and Biden’s resistance to the demands of students and professors, their strong presence will gradually affect the U.S. government’s decision-making processes regarding the Gaza War and support for the Zionist regime.

 

Two: student protests have put  Biden’s “political fate” at risk in the upcoming election and the electoral process. Jonathan Zimmerman, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, commented on student protests, “The real threat to Biden is that younger voters, especially college-educated voters, will not be present. “I don’t think the protesters in college today will vote for former President Donald Trump; almost none of them are voting, and the danger is not here, but the danger is that they simply won’t vote,” he said.

 

Three: Given that university students and professors are also protesting against U.S. companies and investors in the Gaza war, this could also undermine the trend of American investment in companies that provide weapons and equipment to the Israeli army.

 

Four: The significant consequence is that the suppression and suspension of students will lead to more sustained protests and broader participation, which may “spread” the issue of protests and criticisms from the Gaza War case to other U.S. foreign policy cases.

 

Five: Strengthening the two-state solution, despite its unrealistic views, which the Zionist regime and Netanyahu’s government are opposed to, and this idea has serious opponents inside the United States, is another possible outcome of student protests.

The spread and intensification of student protests, which are gradually taking place in European countries and the rest of the world, and we may even witness in Arab and Islamic countries, is another consequence.

 

Final Tip: Ever since the establishment of the Zionist regime, we have never seen such a protest movement against the policies of the United States supporting this regime. This is a very important and “strange” event that has even frightened the Zionist regime’s leaders. In any case, the suppression of recent student protests, which is an important historical experience in the United States, not only does not contain the protesters but also drives a more neutral and gray population in the United States to “support Palestine.” At the same time, the Zionists have made great efforts and spending in recent years to marginalize Palestine in the public opinion of the region and the world.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

President of SCFR: Iran Has Not Closed All Doors, but is Ready for Indirect Negotiations to Evaluate the Other Side, Put Its Conditions, and Make Appropriate Decisions Accordingly.

Strategic Council Online – Dr. Seyed Kamal Kharazi, the President of Iran’s Strategic Council on Foreign Relations (SCFR), analyzed the U.S. negotiation strategy and Iran’s lack of enthusiasm for it. Dr. Kharazi, in his interview with our correspondent, stated that: “What we currently observe from the U.S. administration is a psychological war aimed at promoting the policy of ‘either war or negotiation.’ This is carried out through contradictory messages from U.S. officials.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

President of SCFR: Iran Has Not Closed All Doors, but is Ready for Indirect Negotiations to Evaluate the Other Side, Put Its Conditions, and Make Appropriate Decisions Accordingly.

Strategic Council Online – Dr. Seyed Kamal Kharazi, the President of Iran’s Strategic Council on Foreign Relations (SCFR), analyzed the U.S. negotiation strategy and Iran’s lack of enthusiasm for it. Dr. Kharazi, in his interview with our correspondent, stated that: “What we currently observe from the U.S. administration is a psychological war aimed at promoting the policy of ‘either war or negotiation.’ This is carried out through contradictory messages from U.S. officials.”

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر