Importance and strategic dimensions of Iran’s President visit to Syria

2023/05/14 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The two-day visit of Mr. Raisi, the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, to Syria is important from different dimensions. This trip, which has had many reflections in the media and political circles of the region, has a vital role in the implementation of dozens of economic and commercial agreements, as well as the signing of new military and security agreements, which were agreed upon by the parties during the past years but were not fully implemented. Barsam Mohammadi—Expert in regional issues

Reorganizing and strengthening bilateral relations and expanding and improving the level of economic and commercial cooperation were among the main goals of this trip, about which meaningful negotiations were held between the presidents and officials of the two countries.

Significance of the visit

The visit of the president of Iran to Syria has strategic importance from various political, economic, and regional dimensions regarding the developments in the occupied territories.

The concurrency of this trip with the political and diplomatic developments that we are witnessing in the region, including the improvement of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the progress of relations between Arab countries and Syria, the efforts of Tehran and Moscow to normalize relations between Syria and Turkey, and important openings in some security and military cases, including the war in Yemen has increased the importance of this trip, which is discussed below:

Political dimensions:

Mr. Raisi’s trip to Syria should not be considered in the framework of the regular and periodic visits of the two countries officials to each other. Although Bashar Assad has visited Iran twice in the last 13 years, in 2018 and 2022, during this period, the president Islamic Republic of Iran has not visited Syria at this qualitative and quantitative level.

From this point of view, the visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Damascus shows that not only the “strategic weight” and “political position” of Syria in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has not decreased, but Tehran in the new era, which operates within the framework of “pivot to Asia,” is seeking a “significant transformation” in the existing relations with Syria through the consolidation and strengthening of bilateral ties in various fields.

The critical point is that in recent months, a proposition was heard and seen mainly in the foreign opposition media regarding Iran and Syria that because the relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria are losing color, and with the arrival of Arab countries to Damascus, Tehran no longer has its former influence and strategic importance. The quality of the president of Iran’s presence in Syria, which the people also welcomed, nullified all these propaganda and projections.

Regional dimensions

Under the circumstances that the occupied territories are witnessing significant strategic developments and the Palestinian issue is strongly being highlighted and is at the center of attention; also, at a time when the Zionist regime, for the first time in the past 75 years and in an unprecedented way has faced deep existential crises from inside and outside, the meeting of the presidents of Iran and Syria, who are considered to be the primary and governmental pillars of the Islamic Resistance Front, has an “important message of resistance.”

The widespread reaction of the media and experts of the Zionist regime to this trip, so that the reports of Mr. Raisi’s presence in Syria were at the top of the news in the Hebrew media, comes back to the fact that the new period of Tehran-Damascus relations will also affect the process of developments in the occupied territories.

Hebrew-language media have declared that “the Iranian president’s visit to Syria is very exceptional and should worry Israel.” Channel 13 of the Zionist regime also announced by presenting an analysis that “The Islamic Republic of Iran wants to unify and consolidate the axis of Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas-Islamic Jihad, and this makes it implement a new program regarding Middle East politics.”

At the same time, the remarks of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the meeting with Bashar Assad also in the shrine of Hazrat Zainab (PBUH) and in the interview with the Al-Mayadeen network, which contained essential themes of anti-Zionism and support for the resistance front, confirm this issue.

It is necessary to point out that this trip and Tehran’s effort to strengthen strategic relations with Syria while complementing the improvement of Arab countries’ relations with Syria enhance the elements of Damascus’s national power in the military, economic, etc. fields to overcome the security crisis finally.

Economic dimensions

As mentioned at the beginning of this opinion, economic and commercial issues were one of the important agendas of Mr. Raisi’s trip to Syria.

Under conditions that Syria is in an unfavorable economic situation and requires foreign investments for economic revival and reconstruction, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been one of the priorities of Syria’s foreign policy, especially in the last 12 years, due to its friendly relations with this country. It has good capacities to be one of the pioneer countries in Syria’s new and post-crisis era, where the country’s foreign relations with Arab countries are improving.

During this visit, the two countries presidents signed a long-term strategic cooperation agreement and a memorandum of understanding on cooperation in the oil and energy industry.

Concluding point

Mr. Raisi’s visit to Syria was a power maneuver of the two countries at a crucial historical moment in the region; where on the one hand, we are witnessing new relations and alliances within the region, and on the other hand, we see the intensification of the existential crises of the Zionist regime, which was the source of a significant part of the security crises and the Syrian civil war.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a “strategic and honest ally” of Syria, which has paid the price of this alliance and companionship in various ways. Just as the content of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution’s speech last year in the meeting with Bashar Assad was significant, no country can replace Iran and Tehran’s honest services for Syria. In that meeting, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, referring to the “expressions of friendship and affection of some countries that were on the front against Syria in the past years,” emphasized that “the future line should be clarified using experience.”

In general, the visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Damascus will help open a new chapter of strategic relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading