A Look at Turkey’s Challenges in Syria

2019/12/25 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: An expert on Turkish issues has called Ankara's policies toward Syria "ambitious" and said that under the current conditions Turkey faces challenges in the field of terrorism, the Syrian refugee crisis and the Kurdish separatism near its border that may face its internal security with a challenge.

Speaking to the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Ali Haji Mohammadi outlined the early goals of Turkey in Syria, saying: At the beginning of the coming to power of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), multidimensional foreign policy was one of the most important principles in the Turkish foreign policy, according to which Turkey should pursue an active and multidimensional approach, but because of its actions in Syria and some other policies, Ankara is now facing a passive and unidimensional policy under a single parameter, namely exit from crisis and conflict management, and not let its growing economy be damaged. Unlike the past, it can no longer “synchronize” its relationships with different actors and serve its purpose very well.

He described Turkey’s efforts before the Syrian crisis to follow a policy of détente with Bashar al-Assad government and gain access to its markets, increase bilateral trade volume and economic interdependence, gradual cultural and political influence and relieve historical tensions, and said: These require long-term and clear policies. It was costly and was not compatible with Turkey’s ambitions in Syria and the region and the rush to become a country-centered region.

After the region’s crises, Turkey’s goal was to overthrow Bashar al-Assad and bring a pro-Turkish  government to power and turn Syria into one of the driving axes of Turkey’s relations in the region, but the conditions in Syria took a turn that terrorism, Syria, Iraq, the whole region and Turkey itself face serious challenges, and in its current state Turkey faces the challenge of terrorism, the Syrian refugee crisis and at the same time the Kurdish separatist dilemma near its borders that may endanger its domestic security. In sum, the challenges facing Turkey are not comparable to its achievements.

As for the policies that Turkey should pursue in the future to reduce challenges and bring peace to the region, Haji Mohammadi noted: Turkey does not need a new paradigm in its foreign policy, especially in Syria, but a rethinking and return to some basic foreign policy principles. Justice and Development Party, especially “zeroing in on problems with neighbors” and improving relations with them on the basis of proximity and non-interference and proactive diplomacy rather than pre-emptive diplomacy can save Turkey out of the current status.

Turkey should take advantage of the crisis experiences in Syria and Iraq, with a deeper political maturity and experience of recent developments, place “security for all” policy on the agenda and, as in the past, consider the security of all countries and groups as the pillar of its security in the region and play an effective role against insecurity of neighboring countries, because, the recent developments in the region have shown that the crisis and insecurity in Syria and Iraq or the challenge of sanctions on Iran also threaten Turkey’s security and economy and poses major challenges to the Turkish economy.

Haji Mohammadi considered the use of diplomatic channels before any military intervention and the use of soft power and economic power as other necessary policies before Turkish statesmen. Turkey’s interests are critical, but balanced and coordinated relations with regional and international actors are needed to manage and prevent any conflict in relations in a region where there are always all elements of challenge and conflicts or are created by trans-regional countries.

He added that Turkey should re-establish its multidimensional partnership framework by normalizing relations with its neighbors and playing an effective role in crisis prevention rather than response and reaction to crises, increasing interactions with regional actors and further maintain a balance with trans-regional powers. It should enter a new phase to take more initiatives in politics and economics for the benefit of Turkey and the region. The starting point of this change of attitude is Syria, and the time is now.

Turkey’s cooperation with the Syrian government, Iran, Iraq and partly with Russia can both address regional challenges and enable Turkey to return to its important regional role, the analyst said.

He added: Although the creation of a safe zone can be considered a temporary relative and local success for Turkey, in the long run, without the intelligent and constructive cooperation of neighboring countries, especially the countries involved in the Kurdish issue, this success will not last long.

“The presence of Turkey unlike the presence of Iran and Russia is not the wish of the Syrian people and the legitimate government of Syria,” said Haji Mohammadi. It is on this basis that under international agreements Turkey’s presence in Syria is considered to be unlawful and illegal, so it seeks to legitimize its invasion and presence in Syria and expects NATO to support Turkey as one of its key members. It has provided the space and opportunity to justify it.

Noting that pressures and criticisms of NATO and Turkey were bilateral, he said Turkey’s presence in Syria will be long-term under the NATO support. Otherwise, given the dangers it poses for the Turkish government, it does not appear that Turkey can have a long-term presence in Syria, so Turkey’s continued presence in Syria will be short-lived unless Turkey faces US and to some extent Russia and NATO support.

At the same time, he said that Turkey’s presence in Syria will entail special problems and threats for the Ankara government. He added that Turkey unlike the Arab governments and Iran and the region, has little oil and gas resources and its economy relies on good governance and efficient administration and privileged geopolitical position. It relies on tourism, certain industries and foreign investment, especially from the US, so it will counteract any factor that could endanger its economy and will even avoid countermeasures against the US. History has shown that Turkey and the United States would negotiate on numerous issues and give concessions to each other.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر