Reasons of expediting the exit of America from Afghanistan

2021/08/15 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of Afghanistan issues says on the reasons behind the decision by Joe Biden to withdraw military forces from Afghanistan by September that “it seems the main reason behind this decision is the prolongation of the presence of the US in Afghanistan as the US is present there close to two decades and in the meantime, various administrations in America have failed to realize the slogans they cried in these years.

Mohammad Reza Asgari Moroodi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that it is necessary to note that Americans during the past nearly two decades of their presence in Afghanistan failed to reach the necessary accomplishments despite proposing specific slogans about the fight with terrorism and extremism, the fight with the cultivation, production and transit of narcotics from Afghanistan to other countries and also guaranteeing individual, political, social and civil freedoms. They failed in all these areas.

 

He added that “from this viewpoint, the Afghan society considers the United States of America as a big loser in Afghanistan. In the meantime, from the viewpoint of the people of Afghanistan, the two-decade long presence of America in Afghanistan has intensified war and instability and has not had a tangible achievement for the people of Afghanistan.

 

According to this expert, in the area of the fight with terrorism, during the past twenty years and concurrent with the presence of American troops, Afghanistan was facing the expansion of activities and violence of Taliban. And in the past several years, Afghanistan was witness to the entry of Daesh terrorist group in the east of the country.

 

Asgari added that the center of Nangarhar province has been chosen as the main base for the Daesh terrorist group.

 

Referring to the terrorist operations of Daesh in the heart of the capital of Afghanistan, he said this issue indicates that in any way, the government of the United States of America has failed despite its claims of fighting with the Taliban, the Al-Qaeda and various types of terrorists in Afghanistan; Especially, the entry of the Daesh terrorist group and its formation in Afghanistan are some of the tangible indications of the failure of the White House policies in Afghanistan.

 

Referring to the issue of the cultivation of narcotic drugs and poppy in Afghanistan, he said according to the figures published by international organizations, in recent years, the cultivation of such narcotics has increased by more than four times compared to the period before the occupation of Afghanistan by the US.

 

Expert of Afghanistan issues said “concerning the deepening of democracy and establishment of individual, social and political freedoms in Afghanistan, we witness that according to the figures issues by international institutes, this country is the most dangerous place for journalists and media activists.”

 

Asgari referred to holding elections in any country as a symbol of manifestation of the political participation of people, saying “this is while holding elections in Afghanistan has always faced serious threats and in various periods of presidential, city and provincial council elections, many cities were unable to hold elections and participate in them.

 

In the meantime, he pointed the internal reasons of the White House to withdraw from Afghanistan and referred to the strong presence of US Army troopers in the past 20 years in Afghanistan and added that “this presence has not only failed to realize the White House goal of the fight against terrorism, but also did not realize the demands of the government and nation of America.”

 

Asgari said therefore the Americans decided to exit Afghanistan in order to end a long term period of military presence in another country and stop additional financial and human losses.

 

Intensification of insecurity after the hasty exit of the US from Afghanistan; a leverage for exaggerating the effectiveness of two decades of military presence in this country

 

This expert of Afghanistan issues said that concurrent with the announcement of the exit of American forces from Afghanistan, we are witness to the intensification of insecurity by the Taliban and collapse of more than 80 cities by this group.

 

“These measures and acts by the Taliban provided this opportunity for Washington to promote in their media that with the decision of the US Army to exit Afghanistan, this county in practice has entered a new era of insecurity and violence and therefore, the United States is using these conditions with the goal of exaggerating the effectiveness of its two-decade long presence in Afghanistan.”

 

He concluded that “in other words, the US is trying to portray its presence in Afghanistan as a success in creating stability and controlling the Taliban group and tells the world that now that the US has gone from Afghanistan, countries such as Iran that were calling for the withdrawal of American troops from the region should now be able to control the Taliban. This is while the US has never played the role of controlling.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading