Gaza War, End of Netanyahu’s Political Life

2024/01/06 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The impact of the war in Gaza on Benjamin Netanyahu’s “political future” is one of the “important consequences” of the war in the internal arena of the Zionist regime. The war in Gaza will be the end of Netanyahu’s political life, who made many efforts to gain power in the last election. Hamid Khoshayand - Expert on regional affairs

The consequences of the Gaza war on Netanyahu’s political life were quite clear from the first hours when the Al-Aqsa Storm operation began. Regardless of the outcome of the war in Gaza and how and when it will end, Netanyahu’s political life will also end after that; this is the truth that the reports and developments related to the scene of “politics and power” in the Zionist regime predict.

In this regard, surveys conducted in the occupied territories in the past month indicate an increase in the hatred of parties and public opinion towards Netanyahu and his cabinet, the most important of which are mentioned as follows:

One, Israel’s Channel 12 TV recently conducted a poll in which Gantz will win the election as Netanyahu’s rival and prime minister-elect with many votes over Netanyahu.

Two, Israel’s Channel 13 has published the result of a poll showing that 76 percent of the participants approved that Netanyahu should resign from his position immediately after the end of the war.

Three, according to the results of the “Maariv newspaper” survey, if the Knesset elections are held now, the Likud party led by Netanyahu will only be able to win 18 seats compared to the 32 seats it won during the November 2022 elections. At the same time, the opposition parties will win 79 seats.

Four, according to the results of a poll by “Yedioth Ahronoth” newspaper, 66 percent of the participants want Benjamin Netanyahu to step down as prime minister. According to 75 percent of the participants, Netanyahu is to blame for the security gap that occurred during the Al-Aqsa Storm operation against Israel and should step down.

Meanwhile, the calls within the Zionist regime for Netanyahu to step down from power are increasing to such an extent that “Yair Lapid,” the leader of the cabinet opposition, has stated for the umpteenth time in his speech in the Zionist regime’s parliament that the disaster of October 7 is registered with the name of Netanyahu and he has lost the trust of the security apparatus and the people of Israel; therefore, he should only do the right thing and step down from power.

In addition, internal protests in the occupied territories have also increased to such an extent that in addition to public opinion, the families of Zionist prisoners have only one request by holding various gatherings, including in front of Netanyahu’s house, and that is “the release of the prisoners and removal of Netanyahu from power.”

In most of the political circles, media, and public opinion inside and outside of the Zionist regime, there is a significant agreement on the opinion that Benjamin Netanyahu should no longer remain as the prime minister of the Zionist regime and should step down from power.

It is worth pondering that the US administration no longer wishes to continue Netanyahu’s political life, and Biden has expressed it implicitly and explicitly several times. In the last remarks of US President Biden, who was speaking to the crowd of donors to the election campaign, he said Israel is losing support due to the indiscriminate bombing of Gaza, and Netanyahu must change his hardline cabinet.

Of course, it should be noted that Biden’s criticism of Netanyahu does not contradict the White House’s support for the Zionist regime; the security, existence, and survival of the Zionist regime is the “red line” of all the administrations in the United States. The US distinguishes between supporting the existence of the Zionist regime and supporting the interests of a particular faction or person within the Zionist regime. Therefore, if it considers Netanyahu and his performance as a cause or a threat to the existence of the Zionist regime, it will definitely not hide its concerns in this regard.

In any case, the Al-Aqsa Storm operation and its related developments can be seen as a factor in “ending Netanyahu’s political life.” Netanyahu’s insistence, who is the most power-hungry prime minister of all periods in the Zionist regime, on the continuation of the war and the killing of Palestinians is also evaluated in the sense that he is looking for “building gains” from this war, not for the national interests of the Zionist regime, but primarily for his own political survival.

Netanyahu, who is an expert in technical, tactical, and psychological games, knows very well that on the day after the end of the war, he should be responsive to the events that took place and should withdraw from the scene of politics and power of the Zionist regime.

The Wall Street Journal recently quoted sources in the Likud party headed by Netanyahu and wrote that members of that party believe that the war and crisis in the Gaza Strip will end Netanyahu’s political life. According to the report, members of Netanyahu’s party believe that he is now only continuing the war in the Gaza Strip for his political survival in the Zionist regime. Still, he will not remain in power for a long time.

In the past weeks, Haaretz newspaper published an article written by Nehemia Strassler, which read that the continuation of Netanyahu’s leadership over the Zionist regime and its army in the current war is not for the sake of the regime itself but for his own personal deliverance. All diplomatic measures are done for one purpose only, and that is to stay in power, and this issue will never allow the Zionist regime to win the war; therefore, Netanyahu must go.

Therefore, Netanyahu’s madness in killing the Palestinian people is an attempt to “save his political future”; this is while he will be the “real loser” of the war with any scenario and perspective.

The losses and damage of the Zionist regime in the recent war are dozens of times more than the losses and damage of the regime in the war in the war in October 1973. This is while Golda Meir, the then prime minister of the Zionist regime, who was more powerful and more significant than Netanyahu, was removed from power after the end of the war, despite the subsequent advances in the Yom Kippur war against Syria and Egypt. The same fate of Golda Meir awaits Netanyahu today.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading