France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

2023/11/25 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

In an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations website, Dr. Mahmoud Shouri referred to Armenia’s announcement of readiness to sign a peace agreement with the Republic of Azerbaijan before the end of the year. He stated that changes in the direction of Armenia’s foreign policy have influenced relations between that country and Russia since 2018 and when Pashinyan came to power. The Armenians hoped that with this change of attitude and getting closer to the West, they would improve the conditions for themselves, at least economically, but what happened to Armenia in those years was Russia’s distance from that country and the decrease of Moscow’s desire to guarantee Armenia’s security.

Recalling that even Russia in recent years did not want to continue seizing the areas that Armenia had occupied in the 1990s and suggested that at least part of those areas be returned to Azerbaijan in order to form a peace treaty, he added: On the one hand, the Armenians made changes in their internal and external attitudes, and on the other hand, militarily, the balance in the region was gradually changing in favor of Azerbaijan. Due to the military capabilities it had created, Baku was able to take back the areas occupied by Armenians in the 2020 war and change the military equation in its favor. The Russians also did not show a strong reaction, and due to the conflict in the war with Ukraine, their power declined even more.

Stating that the situation in the Caucasus has now changed in favor of Azerbaijan, the university professor continued: Armenia is forced to go to other countries to ensure its security, and obviously, by strengthening the relations it has historically had with France, it tries to strengthen its military power by increasing purchases and attracting military aid, and in this balance, upgrades its position against Azerbaijan.

Shouri pointed to Yerevan’s emphasis on the necessity of signing a peace treaty with Baku with the aim of stabilizing peace in the region and said: By advancing the peace agreement, Armenia is trying to move Azerbaijan to a direction where it recognizes the current situation of Armenia and no longer has any territorial claims against it, and Baku also takes a two-sided position in this regard.

He pointed out that although Azerbaijan agrees to sign the peace agreement in principle, in practice, it still hopes that, considering the superiority of the military that it has gained in recent years and some existing foreign support that it has for itself, in contrast to the support that is promised to Armenia, it should use this capacity that it has created for itself and the ambitious goals that it has in the region, including, and at the very least, its territorial claims to several Armenian villages.

Shouri stated that this situation could cause tension and change in the Caucasus region in the future, and said: Although France has now provided military support to Armenia, it is unlikely that this support can change the balance in Armenia’s favor. France is trying to convince the Armenians somehow that instead of relying on Russia and Iran, they should look towards Europe and France to ensure their security, and France is the only one that can provide clear military support to Armenia. Besides, in the past weeks, France had rejected the possibility of military intervention to defend Armenia in the Caucasus region and against the Republic of Azerbaijan.

The researcher of developments in Russia and the Caucasus stated that Paris opened a defense office in Armenia to meet the defense and security needs of Armenia, is in daily contact with the army and the authorities of that country, and is preparing to arm Armenia, considered Azerbaijan’s all-out military measure against Armenia unlikely and continued: However, Paris is interested in not allowing the situation to progress as desired by Azerbaijan and Turkey, and is trying to shape the conditions as much as possible in line with its interests with military aid. It has even asked the EU’s foreign policy chief to include Armenia in the European Peace Facility, an EU military aid fund.

Pointing to the important role of the Armenians living in France, Shouri said that the Armenians are a significant part of French society and reminded: Previously, in November 2020, the French Senate voted in favor of imposing sanctions on Azerbaijan and recognizing Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent republic, and also demanded the withdrawal of forces of Azerbaijan from the disputed territory. In addition, Paris has sent 12.5 million euros of humanitarian aid to Armenia and plans to open a consulate in Syunik Province to support Armenia.

He called the type of relations between France and Turkey and its support to Greece effective in France’s support policy for Armenia. He added that France is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia after Russia since 2016. That country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. In this regard, France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading