loader image

The causes and consequences of the suspension of the implementation of the crop agreement between Russia and Ukraine

2023/08/19 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online-Interview: An analyst of Russian issues emphasized that the West does not want to settle any of the dimensions of the Ukraine crisis and is only seeking the continuation and expansion of its dimensions because, according to the Russians, they did not fulfill the obligations they gave to Russia, and they have shown that they do not seek the interests of underdeveloped countries, especially in Africa.

Referring to the efforts by Turkiye to resume the implementation of the grain agreement, Roohollah Modabber told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that before the Second Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum, the President of Russia, in a note pointing to the important aspects of the reasons for the disruption of the grain agreement and its meaningless, blamed the Western side, especially the American side, with the coordination of Ukraine for disruption in the implementation of the deal.

He pointed to the violation of the West’s commitment regarding lifting sanctions on the Russian financial, banking, and SWIFT network. He added that on the one hand, the US has sanctioned Russian fertilizer, and on the other hand, it declares that its goal in establishing a grain agreement is humanitarian. At the same time, Africa desperately needs Russian fertilizers in agriculture, and African officials have emphasized that the embargo on Russian fertilizers is actually an embargo on Africa. Therefore, the Westerners played a double and hypocritical game regarding the grain agreement in this situation.

Recalling that Ukraine has laid mines in a large part of the Black Sea, this analyst of Russia and the Caucasus said that the extent of mining is so great that sometimes the Ukrainians forget their location. Sometimes these mines go to the coast of Turkey through the waves of the sea. Russia has also warned that the Western side is using the ships that were supposed to transport grain from Ukrainian ports to transfer weapons.

Modabber emphasized that the military use of grain ships was against the grain agreement and continued that Russia recently, by increasing its inspections in the Black Sea, detected several ships carrying weapons bound for Ukraine. According to these conditions, apparently, Russia has not unilaterally withdrawn from the grain agreement, but this situation and the created crises, wrong promises, and violations of the West’s commitments practically destroyed the grain agreement.

He continued that 12 hours before the last round of the grain agreement, Ukrainian forces attacked the Crimean bridge under the condition that Russia also agreed to extend it. This has a clear message. With these attacks, all analyses indicated that the Westerners want to create a crisis so that this agreement does not conclude.

Reminding that the West, and especially the United States, do not seek the interests of underdeveloped countries, especially in the African continent, in the discussion of the grain agreement, Modabber added that the grain that was exported from Ukraine in the previous stages was not intended for the African continent. Because it was promised that about 30% of them should enter Africa, but despite this commitment, they entered Europe! Here too, the US acted contrary to its obligations; Because the primary goal of the grain deal was not to create a hunger crisis and food poverty in the African continent, but the West did not adhere to this commitment.

He pointed to Africa’s support for Russia in the Ukraine war and the “We are all Putin” slogans in the demonstrations. He stated that African people know Russia is not the main culprit in the current crises, especially in the grain crisis, as 17 African presidents emphasized this issue at the St. Petersburg summit. Today, the double game of the West has been exposed to the people of Africa, and its goals are clear to independent analysts.

This expert on Russia and the Caucasus issues, while explaining Turkey’s role and the political and economic effects of the disruption in the grain agreement on this country, said that “Turkey made two strategic mistakes towards Russia in the new era, and now it is trying to moderate the situation to some extent. Hosting Zelensky and releasing the Azov Battalion troops caused the cancellation of Putin’s visit and his meeting with Erdogan. For over two months, the Turkish side has been constantly trying to normalize relations. Erdogan has shown that he is turning towards the developments. However, Turkish analysts and those close to the government still emphasize that creating a distance between Turkey and Russia is a big mistake.

Modabber stated that Turkey is still seeking to play an influential role regarding the grain agreement and continued that since all grain transfer services, including the security escort of ships and minesweepers, are provided by Russia, Turkey also insists that the West must comply with its commitments. While the Russians remove mine to move these ships in a safe channel, the Western ships are laying mines.

Emphasizing the negative role of the West in creating a crisis regarding grain obligations, he noted that it seems that the grain deal will be extended in the end. But the disruption has had several consequences. Among other things, it has increased the price of grains and caused problems in the process of grain reaching African countries.

Emphasizing that the West cannot export these grains without coordination with Russia, this analyst of Russia and Caucasus issues said that the West does not want to settle any of the dimensions of the Ukraine crisis and is only looking for the continuation and expansion of its dimensions. This challenge has benefits for the American government and companies, and at the same time, it affects the interests of Europe, Ukraine, and Russia. These are calculated games so that a dialogue between the West and Russia does not occur and the crisis continues.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading