Resumption of Policy of Terror by Zionist Regime; a Suicidal Measure

2023/05/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The resumption of the “policy of terror” by the Zionist regime has once again attracted the attention of Israel's political and security circles. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

Simultaneously with the increasing field, military and security failures against the Palestinian resistance and the “weakening of the deterrence” of the Zionist regime, several commanders and military and security strategists of the regime have proposed to Netanyahu the plan for the assassination of the top commanders of the Palestinian resistance, including “Saleh al-Arouri,” the Vice Chairman of the Hamas political office, “Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,” the Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, “Ziyad Nakhale,” the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement, and “Yahya Sinwar,” the commander of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, all of whom, in their opinion, play a fundamental role in defeating the plans of the Zionist regime.

In this regard, by holding a security meeting in the town of “Sderot,” Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to launch a policy of terror in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and South Lebanon.

The assassination of the Palestinian resistance leaders is under the “wooden” strategy, which has been implemented since 70 years ago to threaten the Palestinians to refrain from martyrdom and military operations against the usurpers and the settlers.

Currently, considering that the Zionist regime does not have the necessary strength for a long-term conflict with the Palestinians, and under the condition that the result of the war in any form with the resistance groups, has faced “failure” on various fronts, therefore the Zionist leaders are trying to assassinate the top leaders and commanders of the Palestinian resistance.

The Zionist leaders seek to achieve the following “objectives” by reviving the policy of terror:

  1. a) Destruction or disruption of the decision-making process and strategic command of the Palestinian resistance, and as a result stopping the empowerment of the resistance groups;
  2. b) Compensating for successive defeats against the Palestinians by retaking the initiative in the operational fields;
  3. c) Improving the regional and international image;
  4. d) Coverup the internal crises and diverting public opinion from the interior to external issues.

But while the Zionist regime is seeking to revive terror operations, this policy will have significant consequences for the usurpers.

Considering that the Islamic resistance groups, especially in the past one and a half years and after the battle of Saif al-Quds, have reached a strategic alliance, coherence, and synergy as well as the creation of various fronts, therefore it is natural that the assassination of the resistance commanders will face with the “hard reaction” of the groups that are present all over the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only does not affect changing the field, political and security situation in favor of the Zionist regime, but on the contrary, it causes the beginning of a new round of conflicts in the occupied territories, the essential feature of which will be “multi-front war.”

A multi-front war is a situation that the Zionist regime is afraid of. In recent years, it has tried to control the field so that the battles do not turn into a multi-front war, and the circle of confrontation with the resistance groups remains limited and small. The weakening of the existence and collapse will be the most strategic consequence of the possible start of a multi-front war in the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only has no change in the “balance of power” or “balancing” in the occupied territories, but on the contrary, it aggravates the process of “balancing terror,”; an issue whose military, security, political, psychological, etc. consequences will be beyond the imagination of the Zionists.

Reviving the policy of terror is not a sign of power but a sign of “weakness and helplessness.” Contrary to what is said in the security and political circles and the media of the Zionist regime, the assassination of the leaders and commanders of the Islamic resistance in Palestine and in Lebanon, which is an attack on the red lines of the Islamic Resistance, is a “costly and complicated” policy that can affect the entire region and the occupied territories. However, it is not clear that such a policy could achieve the objectives of the Zionist regime.

The plan to assassinate Palestinian resistance leaders is a “suicidal policy” for the Zionist regime. Because today, the capabilities of the Palestinian resistance groups are not comparable to the past decades, years, and even months, and they are becoming more powerful day by day.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading