Resumption of Policy of Terror by Zionist Regime; a Suicidal Measure

2023/05/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The resumption of the “policy of terror” by the Zionist regime has once again attracted the attention of Israel's political and security circles. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

Simultaneously with the increasing field, military and security failures against the Palestinian resistance and the “weakening of the deterrence” of the Zionist regime, several commanders and military and security strategists of the regime have proposed to Netanyahu the plan for the assassination of the top commanders of the Palestinian resistance, including “Saleh al-Arouri,” the Vice Chairman of the Hamas political office, “Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,” the Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, “Ziyad Nakhale,” the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement, and “Yahya Sinwar,” the commander of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, all of whom, in their opinion, play a fundamental role in defeating the plans of the Zionist regime.

In this regard, by holding a security meeting in the town of “Sderot,” Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to launch a policy of terror in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and South Lebanon.

The assassination of the Palestinian resistance leaders is under the “wooden” strategy, which has been implemented since 70 years ago to threaten the Palestinians to refrain from martyrdom and military operations against the usurpers and the settlers.

Currently, considering that the Zionist regime does not have the necessary strength for a long-term conflict with the Palestinians, and under the condition that the result of the war in any form with the resistance groups, has faced “failure” on various fronts, therefore the Zionist leaders are trying to assassinate the top leaders and commanders of the Palestinian resistance.

The Zionist leaders seek to achieve the following “objectives” by reviving the policy of terror:

  1. a) Destruction or disruption of the decision-making process and strategic command of the Palestinian resistance, and as a result stopping the empowerment of the resistance groups;
  2. b) Compensating for successive defeats against the Palestinians by retaking the initiative in the operational fields;
  3. c) Improving the regional and international image;
  4. d) Coverup the internal crises and diverting public opinion from the interior to external issues.

But while the Zionist regime is seeking to revive terror operations, this policy will have significant consequences for the usurpers.

Considering that the Islamic resistance groups, especially in the past one and a half years and after the battle of Saif al-Quds, have reached a strategic alliance, coherence, and synergy as well as the creation of various fronts, therefore it is natural that the assassination of the resistance commanders will face with the “hard reaction” of the groups that are present all over the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only does not affect changing the field, political and security situation in favor of the Zionist regime, but on the contrary, it causes the beginning of a new round of conflicts in the occupied territories, the essential feature of which will be “multi-front war.”

A multi-front war is a situation that the Zionist regime is afraid of. In recent years, it has tried to control the field so that the battles do not turn into a multi-front war, and the circle of confrontation with the resistance groups remains limited and small. The weakening of the existence and collapse will be the most strategic consequence of the possible start of a multi-front war in the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only has no change in the “balance of power” or “balancing” in the occupied territories, but on the contrary, it aggravates the process of “balancing terror,”; an issue whose military, security, political, psychological, etc. consequences will be beyond the imagination of the Zionists.

Reviving the policy of terror is not a sign of power but a sign of “weakness and helplessness.” Contrary to what is said in the security and political circles and the media of the Zionist regime, the assassination of the leaders and commanders of the Islamic resistance in Palestine and in Lebanon, which is an attack on the red lines of the Islamic Resistance, is a “costly and complicated” policy that can affect the entire region and the occupied territories. However, it is not clear that such a policy could achieve the objectives of the Zionist regime.

The plan to assassinate Palestinian resistance leaders is a “suicidal policy” for the Zionist regime. Because today, the capabilities of the Palestinian resistance groups are not comparable to the past decades, years, and even months, and they are becoming more powerful day by day.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading