Resumption of Policy of Terror by Zionist Regime; a Suicidal Measure

2023/05/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The resumption of the “policy of terror” by the Zionist regime has once again attracted the attention of Israel's political and security circles. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

Simultaneously with the increasing field, military and security failures against the Palestinian resistance and the “weakening of the deterrence” of the Zionist regime, several commanders and military and security strategists of the regime have proposed to Netanyahu the plan for the assassination of the top commanders of the Palestinian resistance, including “Saleh al-Arouri,” the Vice Chairman of the Hamas political office, “Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,” the Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, “Ziyad Nakhale,” the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement, and “Yahya Sinwar,” the commander of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, all of whom, in their opinion, play a fundamental role in defeating the plans of the Zionist regime.

In this regard, by holding a security meeting in the town of “Sderot,” Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to launch a policy of terror in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and South Lebanon.

The assassination of the Palestinian resistance leaders is under the “wooden” strategy, which has been implemented since 70 years ago to threaten the Palestinians to refrain from martyrdom and military operations against the usurpers and the settlers.

Currently, considering that the Zionist regime does not have the necessary strength for a long-term conflict with the Palestinians, and under the condition that the result of the war in any form with the resistance groups, has faced “failure” on various fronts, therefore the Zionist leaders are trying to assassinate the top leaders and commanders of the Palestinian resistance.

The Zionist leaders seek to achieve the following “objectives” by reviving the policy of terror:

  1. a) Destruction or disruption of the decision-making process and strategic command of the Palestinian resistance, and as a result stopping the empowerment of the resistance groups;
  2. b) Compensating for successive defeats against the Palestinians by retaking the initiative in the operational fields;
  3. c) Improving the regional and international image;
  4. d) Coverup the internal crises and diverting public opinion from the interior to external issues.

But while the Zionist regime is seeking to revive terror operations, this policy will have significant consequences for the usurpers.

Considering that the Islamic resistance groups, especially in the past one and a half years and after the battle of Saif al-Quds, have reached a strategic alliance, coherence, and synergy as well as the creation of various fronts, therefore it is natural that the assassination of the resistance commanders will face with the “hard reaction” of the groups that are present all over the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only does not affect changing the field, political and security situation in favor of the Zionist regime, but on the contrary, it causes the beginning of a new round of conflicts in the occupied territories, the essential feature of which will be “multi-front war.”

A multi-front war is a situation that the Zionist regime is afraid of. In recent years, it has tried to control the field so that the battles do not turn into a multi-front war, and the circle of confrontation with the resistance groups remains limited and small. The weakening of the existence and collapse will be the most strategic consequence of the possible start of a multi-front war in the occupied territories.

Reviving the policy of terror not only has no change in the “balance of power” or “balancing” in the occupied territories, but on the contrary, it aggravates the process of “balancing terror,”; an issue whose military, security, political, psychological, etc. consequences will be beyond the imagination of the Zionists.

Reviving the policy of terror is not a sign of power but a sign of “weakness and helplessness.” Contrary to what is said in the security and political circles and the media of the Zionist regime, the assassination of the leaders and commanders of the Islamic resistance in Palestine and in Lebanon, which is an attack on the red lines of the Islamic Resistance, is a “costly and complicated” policy that can affect the entire region and the occupied territories. However, it is not clear that such a policy could achieve the objectives of the Zionist regime.

The plan to assassinate Palestinian resistance leaders is a “suicidal policy” for the Zionist regime. Because today, the capabilities of the Palestinian resistance groups are not comparable to the past decades, years, and even months, and they are becoming more powerful day by day.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading