loader image

Failed Deal of the Century Awaits New Intifada!

2020/02/17 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: In the future, Palestine will witness bloody demonstrations and clashes between the Palestinians and the Zionist regime, and even the Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas may dissolve the PA and become a Palestinian militant organization to formally and effectively oppose the Deal of the Century. Then the US and the Zionist regime can no longer negotiate with a Palestinian official. In addition, the rising tide of opposition in the world to the plan, especially by Palestinian groups, has led us to see some kind of retreat from Washington as the US ambassador to the United Nations said at a special Security Council session: The United States peace plan is not a program to be imposed on the parties to the conflict, they have a choice to accept or reject it." Hassan Hanizadeh - Middle East Affairs Expert

With the unveiling of Donald Trump’s Deal of the Century, opposition to and approval of the plan has become more apparent than ever. In this regard, we recently heard the Speaker of the Kuwaiti Parliament, in response to the Deal of the Century, said: “Let us, the Arab nation, tell you! What if we pay a much higher price than what you suggest to you to make you leave our sanctities alone and get lost from our holy land?”

He then threw a copy of the US proposed peace deal, the Deal of the Century, into the dust bin, saying: “The real and proper place for this plan is the dust bin of history.”

In fact, today the Deal of the Century plan has divided the Islamic world into two poles, with some countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and the Kingdom of Oman agreeing to the plan because of political adherence to the US, while other Islamic states like Malaysia, Jordan, Tunisia, Algeria, Kuwait, and Iraq, have opposed the plan. The main reason for the disagreements is that the Deal of the Century plan was prepared without regard to the framework of conventional international relations and outside the United Nations, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League and does not consider the Palestinian rights.

One of the surprising things, as mentioned, was that the Speaker of the Kuwaiti Parliament, in a very lengthy and revolutionary response, described the Deal of the Century as impractical and tore it in front of the international media cameras. This shows that even some countries that are in line with US policies such as Jordan and Kuwait are not happy with the plan and consider it to be in violation of the basic rights of the Palestinians.

On this basis, it seems that the Deal of the Century is a failed plan and cannot be implemented. Meantime, PA President Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Jihadist movement unanimously opposed the deal. It is predicted that the Occupied Territories will in the future witness a new intifada against the Zionist regime.

Thus, the Deal of the Century is a one-way plan that encompasses the will of the Zionist regime and will naturally be opposed by the Palestinian people.

Public opinion in the Muslim world and in the Arab world is also sceptical of the plan. The recent demonstrations in several Islamic countries show that the Muslim and Arab nations are opposed to the Deal of the century and regard it a violation of the rights of the Palestinian people. On the other hand, some European countries have reacted negatively to the plan and consider it unenforceable. Thus, it is anticipated that the Deal of the Century will join the dead records of the US and Israel in the near future.

In the meantime protests and opposition are expected to continue in the future, and the Palestinian people are now united with all political spectrums for the first time and have explicitly stated that they will not allow this plan to be implemented.

Other countries will also oppose the plan by taking positions and participating in popular marches, and since the Palestinians are one of the key parties in the Deal of the Century, they will not allow the plan to be implemented.

So in the future, Palestine will witness bloody demonstrations and clashes between the Palestinians and the Zionist regime, and even Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas may dissolve the PA in a formal and practical confrontation with the Deal of the Century, turning it into a Palestinian militant organization. In that case, the US and the Zionist regime will no longer be able to negotiate with an official Palestinian institution. In such circumstances, it seems that not only will the plan not be implemented, but that future conflicts between the Palestinians and the Zionist army will also intensify.

Concerning the goals of Tel Aviv and Washington in pursuit of the plan, it also appears that Zionist regime Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who failed in the past two elections in the Israeli Knesset, is trying to use the Deal of the Century as a political propaganda but it will fail because the Palestinian people will not allow the US to impose its policies on them. Donald Trump also needs an election campaign ahead of the US presidential election this year, so he is trying to implement the Deal of the Century plan before the 2020 election, but will ultimately fail because of global opposition.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading