loader image

Scenarios Ahead of Kashmir Crisis

2019/09/30 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: There is a scenario about Kashmir whereby in the absence of any solution, the critical situation of Muslims in Kashmir will continue until other options are found in India and Pakistan in the future. Nozar Shafiei - Subcontinent Affairs Expert

The current events in Kashmir between India and Pakistan are the outcome of what happened about a month ago when the Indian government revoked Kashmir’s autonomy. The root of this crisis, of course, goes back to many years ago, at least to 1974 when the Indian Subcontinent was divided. At that point, however, it was not made clear whether Kashmir should eventually join India or Pakistan. So, tensions and conflicts have been going on between India and Pakistan ever since.

From time to time, conflicts are exacerbated under various pretexts. In fact, Pakistan considers the break-up of the Indian Subcontinent and its national unity incomplete without annexing Kashmir. Pakistan claims that the Indian Subcontinent is divided on the basis of religion, geographical location and the will of the inhabitants of each region, and if these are our basis, Kashmir should join Pakistan.

That is why Pakistan invaded Kashmir in 1947. In contrast, India believes that in the year after Pakistan attacked Kashmir, the Indian-dominated Hindu ruler of India, Harry Singh, demanded military assistance from New Delhi and agreed that Kashmir come under the Indian control irrespective of India’s foreign and military policy. So from Delhi’s point of view, Kashmir is an integral part of India.

Also at that time, Lord Mountbatten, the governor-general of India, believed that the best way to bring about peace was for Kashmir to be controlled by India until a public vote on Kashmir’s fate takes place. Accordingly, the Indian army occupied two-thirds of Kashmir and Pakistan took control of the northern part of the state. In fact, the end of the first war between the two countries in 1949 was accompanied by the division of Kashmir and the creation of a “line of control” between the two countries. So these issues have existed in the past and caused tensions between India and Pakistan, with both countries having their own nuclear weapons.

Since the issue of Kashmir is a territorial one it is very difficult to resolve, especially as India believes that Kashmir is a domestic issue and ultimately a matter of Indian-Pakistani relations that does not allow any country or organization to enter into the dispute. Unlike India, Islamabad seeks to internationalize this issue.

Now that India has abolished Kashmir’s autonomy, rhetoric between the two countries’ authorities has intensified. In the latest reaction, the Indian Foreign Minister has declared that Pakistan’s Kashmir is part of India, and Pakistan has strongly responded to the Indian Foreign Minister’s “extremist rhetoric”.

The question now is what scenarios can be envisioned for the future of this conflict; the first scenario is Kashmir’s accession to India; the second is Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan; and the third scenario is the formation of a larger, independent Kashmir that includes both Pakistan-held and India-held Kashmir.

The third scenario includes a smaller independent Kashmir, so that the part held by India is ceded to the country and Pakistan-held Kashmir be annexed to Kashmir Valley. Then a smaller and independent Kashmir will be formed.

The fourth scenario is maintaining the status quo, i.e. accepting Kashmir as it was previously divided.

Finally, a no-solution scenario is that the critical situation of Muslims in Kashmir will continue without any solution until other alternatives are offered in the future.

Nevertheless, the ball is in the Pakistani court now, as India has taken steps to abolish Kashmir autonomy, and it is now the turn of the Islamabad government to respond, in a move, to India’s decision to abrogate Kashmir autonomy.

Of course, Pakistan seems to be in favor of settling the matter diplomatically, but India is unlikely to simply backtrack on what it has done. Because Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a nationalist and those who voted for him in the parliamentary elections expected him to take the action on Kashmir. Modi in his election campaign slogans had promised voters to abrogate Kashmir autonomy. Anyways, today Kashmir can be the root of a new crisis and challenges in India-Pakistan relations.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Analysis of China’s Statement Regarding War in Ukraine, Beijing’s Motivations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Russian affairs says the Chinese statement lacked a specific proposal to exchange concessions between the two parties involved in the Ukraine war and open a passage for peace and only demanded to start negotiations. He added: During the Ukraine war, China, by buying cheap energy from Russia and increasing its energy reserves, has not only become an energy exporter for the first time but also gained more bargaining power against other energy exporters to China.

Reverse Migration from Occupied Territories, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: If the pillars of forming a nation-state are the four factors of population, territory, government, and sovereignty, the Zionist regime, since its establishment and according to the provisions of international law, has lacked the factors mentioned earlier.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Iran and Saudi relationship contribute to ending the war in Yemen

Strategic Council Online: The president of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said in a meeting with Hans Grundberg, the UN Special Envoy for Yemen that the restoration of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which was mediated by China, will contribute to ending the war in Yemen.

China’s Capacities, Challenges to Play a Role in Making Intl. Peace, Stability

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asia affairs considers China as having traditional and modern components of power in the world, which enables Beijing, to enjoy the possibility of balancing. He says: The Chinese have limitations in role-playing as an actor to make international peace and stability and generally they enter the challenges from the more trivial topics. This approach is considered a challenge to boost China’s mediating role and influence.

Dimensions, goals and consequences of Judaization of Bahraini textbooks

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: In September 2020, the Kingdom of Bahrain signed a reconciliation plan with the Zionist regime known as the “Abraham Accords”. Bahrain is the fourth Arab regime that has recognized the Zionist regime. During the past two years, Bahrain has been one of the Arab regimes that has continued to expand bilateral relations with Tel Aviv despite widespread domestic opposition.
Hamid Khoshayand- Expert of regional issues

A Glimpse at Developments of Intl. Order; a Year after Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs, saying that there is no sign of an end to the war in Ukraine in the current conditions, emphasized: Now the equations of the past are messed up and the new system is based on multilateralism and neutrality and relies on regionalism in which regional powers will cooperate and compete with each other at the international level.

Greece-US Arms Cooperation, Strengthening National Unity on Threshold of Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During Anthony Blinken’s two-day trip to Greece, defense and security issues were major part of his talks with Greek officials. The Greek side expressed interest in purchasing fifth generation of F-35 fighter jets, and the US Secretary of State, while expressing satisfaction with the decision of the Athens government, announced support of the US administration. It is expected that the official response of the United States to Greece’s request for the purchase of 20+20 F-35 fighter planes will be announced in early April.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International affairs analyst

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Analysis of China’s Statement Regarding War in Ukraine, Beijing’s Motivations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Russian affairs says the Chinese statement lacked a specific proposal to exchange concessions between the two parties involved in the Ukraine war and open a passage for peace and only demanded to start negotiations. He added: During the Ukraine war, China, by buying cheap energy from Russia and increasing its energy reserves, has not only become an energy exporter for the first time but also gained more bargaining power against other energy exporters to China.

Reverse Migration from Occupied Territories, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: If the pillars of forming a nation-state are the four factors of population, territory, government, and sovereignty, the Zionist regime, since its establishment and according to the provisions of international law, has lacked the factors mentioned earlier.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Iran and Saudi relationship contribute to ending the war in Yemen

Strategic Council Online: The president of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said in a meeting with Hans Grundberg, the UN Special Envoy for Yemen that the restoration of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which was mediated by China, will contribute to ending the war in Yemen.

China’s Capacities, Challenges to Play a Role in Making Intl. Peace, Stability

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asia affairs considers China as having traditional and modern components of power in the world, which enables Beijing, to enjoy the possibility of balancing. He says: The Chinese have limitations in role-playing as an actor to make international peace and stability and generally they enter the challenges from the more trivial topics. This approach is considered a challenge to boost China’s mediating role and influence.

Dimensions, goals and consequences of Judaization of Bahraini textbooks

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: In September 2020, the Kingdom of Bahrain signed a reconciliation plan with the Zionist regime known as the “Abraham Accords”. Bahrain is the fourth Arab regime that has recognized the Zionist regime. During the past two years, Bahrain has been one of the Arab regimes that has continued to expand bilateral relations with Tel Aviv despite widespread domestic opposition.
Hamid Khoshayand- Expert of regional issues

A Glimpse at Developments of Intl. Order; a Year after Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs, saying that there is no sign of an end to the war in Ukraine in the current conditions, emphasized: Now the equations of the past are messed up and the new system is based on multilateralism and neutrality and relies on regionalism in which regional powers will cooperate and compete with each other at the international level.

Greece-US Arms Cooperation, Strengthening National Unity on Threshold of Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During Anthony Blinken’s two-day trip to Greece, defense and security issues were major part of his talks with Greek officials. The Greek side expressed interest in purchasing fifth generation of F-35 fighter jets, and the US Secretary of State, while expressing satisfaction with the decision of the Athens government, announced support of the US administration. It is expected that the official response of the United States to Greece’s request for the purchase of 20+20 F-35 fighter planes will be announced in early April.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International affairs analyst

Loading