Perspective of Political Tensions in the Zionist Regime

2024/01/06 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: Disputes have escalated within the Zionist regime after October 7; some people want to reduce the intensity of the war, and others believe that the war should continue intensively.

Mansour Barati, a researcher on the Zionist regime’s affairs, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, said: The first week of the war in the Zionist regime, a war cabinet was formed with only three members, including Benjamin Netanyahu, Yoav Galant, Minister of War, and Benny Gantz, who was not a member in the previous cabinet and was a member of the opposition.

He added: Since all the decisions are made by those three and the management of the war is with them, some opposition has been formed there.

According to Barati, people such as Ben-Gvir, Minister of Public Security, and Bezalel Smotrich, Minister of Finance (the second minister of war in the Zionist regime), who are members of the security cabinet, are dissatisfied with the developments since the beginning of the war because they have no impact on the decisions about the war.

The expert continued: Over the past 80 days, they have always insisted that the security cabinet members be able to express their views on the war decisions, but this has not happened. The cabinet makes decisions only with its three members. Also, the extremist right-wing members of the security cabinet opposed the arrival of humanitarian aid to Gaza, saying that the aid should be conditioned to the release of all the Zionist prisoners. However, the war cabinet has allowed humanitarian aid to enter Gaza several times.

Pointing out that the second dispute with the security cabinet was about a temporary ceasefire, Barati explained: The extremist right-wing believed that the ceasefire should not be established because it would directly strengthen Hamas, but the war cabinet, especially Gantz and Galant, said they needed a war break, which happened and has been extended twice. This ceasefire led the extremist right-wing again to oppose the war decisions.

The expert on Zionist regime affairs in continuation said the way the war continues is also the dispute of the Zionist internal factions; on the one hand, the extremist right-wing thinks that the war cabinet wants to reduce the intensity of the war and pursue it in the form of military operations. That is, like what they observed at the beginning of the Russian-Ukraine war, the operations were not widespread. For this reason, they have announced that they are opposed to this decision and want to prevent it from being adopted.

He stressed, But it is unclear how true this is because none of the cabinet members have approved that they want to reduce the war.

Barati explained: Members of the temporary cabinet, pointing out that another temporary ceasefire may be established from the beginning of January, are concerned about it, saying that the ceasefire may be prolonged and continue.

The expert on Zionist regime affairs said: The extremist right wing of the security cabinet has repeatedly threatened to resign because of opposition to the decisions of the three-man war cabinet but has not taken any action so far. In fact, with such policies, they intend to pressure the cabinet to put their views into action.

On the current trend of field developments in the scene of the war between the Zionist regime and Palestine, the expert said: The trend of developments is as such that the war seems to continue and it will last at least a month. It may even exceed a month. The reason is that the Zionist regime has not achieved the operational goals that it intended.

Pointing out that there is a lot of dissatisfaction with the government’s performance, he explained: In the polls, the situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party is bad, and if the election is held, the Likud Party will receive under 20 seats, while in the past election, it received 32 seats.

Barati said, but Gantz and its coalition still receive between 36 and 40 seats in the polls.

In conclusion, the expert on Zionist regime affairs emphasized that what has been cleared in recent weeks is that Netanyahu cannot save himself, and his political life will not continue; therefore, he either goes out of the political arena, whether after the election or in his own decision.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading