Dimensions, Consequences, Prospects of Intl. Trade De-dollarization

2023/04/15 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The war in Ukraine and the imposition of 13,656 sanctions against Russia, as well as blocking half of that country’s foreign exchange reserves (300 billion dollars) in foreign banks, has intensified the incentive for different countries in the world, from Brazil to Southeast Asia to “de-dollarize” foreign trade. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on international affairs

Recently, China and Brazil signed a critical agreement whereby the US dollar will be excluded from trade exchanges between the two countries. The deal gives China (the world’s second-largest economy) and Brazil (one of the world’s top 10 economies) the option to use the Chinese (yuan) or Brazilian (real) currency in their trade transactions. China has signed similar trade agreements with several other countries, including Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Pakistan, and is rapidly de-dollarizing its bilateral trade with foreign countries.

China and Brazil are each other’s important economic partners, and the volume of trade between the two countries is about 100 billion dollars. China’s share of Brazil’s total export products (240 billion dollars per year) is about 33 percent, or 79 billion dollars, more than three times Brazil’s exports to the US. The United States, as Brazil’s second export destination, has attracted less than 10 percent of the country’s total exports.

China and Brazil have 20 percent of the world’s population and 12 percent of their land area. With a GDP of 18 trillion dollars, China alone accounts for about 18 percent of the world economy, second only to the United States.

After the agreement between China and Brazil, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, known as “ASEAN,” is also considering removing the dollar, euro, yen, and British pound from trade transactions between member countries and using national currencies. ASEAN has ten permanent members and one observer member, occupying 7 percent of the world population and 3 percent of its area.

ASEAN is the third largest trade bloc in the world after NAFTA (the US, Canada, and Mexico) and the European Union. The total volume of ASEAN foreign trade is about 2 trillion and 500 billion dollars.

Considering that the size of ASEAN’s digital economy is estimated at 200 billion dollars, and according to forecasts, this amount will reach 360 billion dollars by 2025 and one trillion dollars in 2030, therefore, ASEAN is looking for a digital cross-border payment system between its member countries to use their national currencies in trade transactions.

The world’s emerging economic powers, known as “BRICS,” have also made significant efforts to remove the dollar from their trade exchanges in the past one or two years. BRICS members are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

BRICS is strengthening infrastructure related to the common payment network to reduce reliance on the US and European financial system based on a basket of the currencies of member countries. The total volume of BRICS exports is about 4 trillion dollars. BRICS member countries have increased the use of their currencies in mutual trade in recent months. BRICS has half the world’s population and 26 percent of its territories, 28 percent of its economic capacity, and 20 percent of the world’s commodity trade.

Members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization also recently agreed to increase their trade in local currencies. Shanghai has a 20 trillion dollar economy, which includes 23 percent of the world economy.

The agreement of the world non-Western economic and political powers and organizations to remove the dollar from trade exchanges, which has seen a progressive trend in recent months, is a “big blow” to the “dollar dominance” in the world.

The dollar, whose technical infrastructure is at the disposal of the United States, is the “cornerstone” of the power and hegemony of the United States in the international system. The role played by the dollar in the world power of the United States in the years after World War II has been greater than other components of the country’s military, industrial, technological, etc., strength.

More than 70 percent of currency transfers on the SWIFT platform are in dollars. An essential part of non-dollar transfers also touches the dollar cycle in part of the transfer process. In addition, the dollar accounts for 59.8 percent of the world’s foreign exchange reserves. These figures show that the dollar remains dominant in international trade. However, the “ de-dollarization “ trend of international trade has intensified in recent months in trade exchanges of non-Western countries and organizations among the top global and regional economies.

Although weakening the dollar’s role in the short term seems unlikely, in the medium term, this process will deal a significant blow to the global hegemony and dominance of the United States, a major part of which is owed to the dollar’s supremacy in the world.

If extended to other countries, the de-dollarization of international trade and bilateral and multilateral exchanges between countries will cause more control over financial and monetary policies and prevent shocks and economic-livelihood disturbances that have social and security consequences.

Decreasing the dollar’s role in trade between countries also leads to the potential strengthening of economic relations between nations, increasing the development process of poor countries, creating immunity against the US and European sanctions, and weakening the dollar in international trade and currency diversification in the world currency market.

The US sanctions against Russia and the blocking of half of the country’s foreign exchange reserves have given “strong and new impetus” to efforts to reduce the role of the dollar in international trade. Today, the non-Western countries of the world have concluded that tying the fate of their economy and foreign exchange to the dollar, in a situation where the US and Europe seek to achieve maximum domination over the world economy and trade through dollar and euro, causes a permanent threat to the economic infrastructures and always makes those countries vulnerable before the US.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading