Dimensions, Consequences, Prospects of Intl. Trade De-dollarization

2023/04/15 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The war in Ukraine and the imposition of 13,656 sanctions against Russia, as well as blocking half of that country’s foreign exchange reserves (300 billion dollars) in foreign banks, has intensified the incentive for different countries in the world, from Brazil to Southeast Asia to “de-dollarize” foreign trade. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on international affairs

Recently, China and Brazil signed a critical agreement whereby the US dollar will be excluded from trade exchanges between the two countries. The deal gives China (the world’s second-largest economy) and Brazil (one of the world’s top 10 economies) the option to use the Chinese (yuan) or Brazilian (real) currency in their trade transactions. China has signed similar trade agreements with several other countries, including Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Pakistan, and is rapidly de-dollarizing its bilateral trade with foreign countries.

China and Brazil are each other’s important economic partners, and the volume of trade between the two countries is about 100 billion dollars. China’s share of Brazil’s total export products (240 billion dollars per year) is about 33 percent, or 79 billion dollars, more than three times Brazil’s exports to the US. The United States, as Brazil’s second export destination, has attracted less than 10 percent of the country’s total exports.

China and Brazil have 20 percent of the world’s population and 12 percent of their land area. With a GDP of 18 trillion dollars, China alone accounts for about 18 percent of the world economy, second only to the United States.

After the agreement between China and Brazil, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, known as “ASEAN,” is also considering removing the dollar, euro, yen, and British pound from trade transactions between member countries and using national currencies. ASEAN has ten permanent members and one observer member, occupying 7 percent of the world population and 3 percent of its area.

ASEAN is the third largest trade bloc in the world after NAFTA (the US, Canada, and Mexico) and the European Union. The total volume of ASEAN foreign trade is about 2 trillion and 500 billion dollars.

Considering that the size of ASEAN’s digital economy is estimated at 200 billion dollars, and according to forecasts, this amount will reach 360 billion dollars by 2025 and one trillion dollars in 2030, therefore, ASEAN is looking for a digital cross-border payment system between its member countries to use their national currencies in trade transactions.

The world’s emerging economic powers, known as “BRICS,” have also made significant efforts to remove the dollar from their trade exchanges in the past one or two years. BRICS members are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

BRICS is strengthening infrastructure related to the common payment network to reduce reliance on the US and European financial system based on a basket of the currencies of member countries. The total volume of BRICS exports is about 4 trillion dollars. BRICS member countries have increased the use of their currencies in mutual trade in recent months. BRICS has half the world’s population and 26 percent of its territories, 28 percent of its economic capacity, and 20 percent of the world’s commodity trade.

Members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization also recently agreed to increase their trade in local currencies. Shanghai has a 20 trillion dollar economy, which includes 23 percent of the world economy.

The agreement of the world non-Western economic and political powers and organizations to remove the dollar from trade exchanges, which has seen a progressive trend in recent months, is a “big blow” to the “dollar dominance” in the world.

The dollar, whose technical infrastructure is at the disposal of the United States, is the “cornerstone” of the power and hegemony of the United States in the international system. The role played by the dollar in the world power of the United States in the years after World War II has been greater than other components of the country’s military, industrial, technological, etc., strength.

More than 70 percent of currency transfers on the SWIFT platform are in dollars. An essential part of non-dollar transfers also touches the dollar cycle in part of the transfer process. In addition, the dollar accounts for 59.8 percent of the world’s foreign exchange reserves. These figures show that the dollar remains dominant in international trade. However, the “ de-dollarization “ trend of international trade has intensified in recent months in trade exchanges of non-Western countries and organizations among the top global and regional economies.

Although weakening the dollar’s role in the short term seems unlikely, in the medium term, this process will deal a significant blow to the global hegemony and dominance of the United States, a major part of which is owed to the dollar’s supremacy in the world.

If extended to other countries, the de-dollarization of international trade and bilateral and multilateral exchanges between countries will cause more control over financial and monetary policies and prevent shocks and economic-livelihood disturbances that have social and security consequences.

Decreasing the dollar’s role in trade between countries also leads to the potential strengthening of economic relations between nations, increasing the development process of poor countries, creating immunity against the US and European sanctions, and weakening the dollar in international trade and currency diversification in the world currency market.

The US sanctions against Russia and the blocking of half of the country’s foreign exchange reserves have given “strong and new impetus” to efforts to reduce the role of the dollar in international trade. Today, the non-Western countries of the world have concluded that tying the fate of their economy and foreign exchange to the dollar, in a situation where the US and Europe seek to achieve maximum domination over the world economy and trade through dollar and euro, causes a permanent threat to the economic infrastructures and always makes those countries vulnerable before the US.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading