An analysis of Europe’s attempt to designate the IRGC a terrorist organization and the consequences

2023/02/05 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Any attempt by Europe to designate the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps--a sovereign body and part of the official defense force of the Islamic Republic of Iran—as a terrorist organization will affect the interests and national security of European countries before it harms the Islamic Republic of Iran. Hamid Khoshayand—Expert of regional issues

The European Parliament, with 705 MPs, is one of the most important institutions of the European Union. On January 29, this legislative body approved an interventionist resolution concerning “Europe’s response to the protests in Iran” with 313 votes. The approvals of the European Parliament have a political/propaganda aspect and are not binding until a decision about them is taken by the European Council.

The “controversial” part of this resolution was the request of members of the parliament from the member states of the European Union to put the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps in the “European Union terrorist list”. But as expected, this request was not taken into consideration by the European Council that went that far only to impose “new package of sanctions” on Iran.

About the recent actions of Europe against Iran, some points are important:

First; The riots of the past months in Iran have made parts of the policy-making and decision-making system in European countries to take miscalculated measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran. By reflecting on some statements, actions and policies of some European governments regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran, it is clear that they are influenced by the hostile policies of the United States and the United Kingdom, as well as the illusory creations of “mafia media” and “anti-Iranian lobby” (the MKO, Zionists, etc.) active in those countries. The desperate action and request of the European Parliament to include the IRGC in the list of terrorist organizations is one of the clear examples in this regard.

This shows that based on the irrational views and insinuations of “terrorist and pressure groups”, the macro and long-term interests of Europe have been overshadowed and affected; this is in complete contradiction with the so-called political “rationality” of Europe. Unfortunately, European foreign policy is now surrounded more than ever by networks, elements and groups that hide their political interests and goals behind the interests of Europe and create tension in this area.

Second; Despite the recent resolution of the European Parliament, the Council of Europe, due to some reasons and considerations, including Iran’s warnings, bypassed it on the basis of the lack of necessary legal grounds to designate IRGC.

Third; At the current stage, the European Union has “changed tactics” and has moved from costly anti-sovereign measures to imposing more sanctions on the Islamic Republic of Iran. In this regard, the Council of Europe in its recent meeting and following the US, again included 18 Iranian personalities and 19 institutions in the list of sanctions.

Since the beginning of October, the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada have imposed a total of 20 rounds of combined and new economic and human rights sanctions on the Islamic Republic of Iran with the stated goal of “maximum pressure”. Of course, Iran has reciprocated.

One of the “ponderable” points regarding the imposed sanctions is that the vast majority of these sanctions are against individuals and institutions that had been sanctioned many times before and whose names are included in the various sanctions packages that the US and Europe have announced at different times!

It goes without saying that the purpose of the US and Europe in announcing and applying these sanctions is mainly exploitation in the form of “psychological operations” with the aim of influencing Iran’s economic sectors and public opinion (disappointment, polarization, etc.).

And the final point is that designating the IRGC is not a new issue and it has been sanctioned by the US government before. Therefore, it does not have a special effect on the process of the IRGC’s inherent activities and tasks, which rely on domestic talents. But this never means Iran’s indifference or silence vis-a-vis Europe’s anti-sovereign action, which strongly contradicts international law.

The IRGC, as part of the country’s official defense force, is one of the “red lines” of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Any attempt to place the IRGC in the list of terrorist organizations in Europe will overshadow and impact the interests and national security of European countries before it harms the Islamic Republic of Iran.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading