Britain’s strategic motivations in confrontation with Russia by sending heavy weapons to Ukraine

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert stated that London's move in sending advanced combat tanks to Ukraine is considered a turning point in the field of Western arms aid to Ukraine, adding that for the US and UK, the continuation of the war in Ukraine and turning it into a war of attrition, considering the weakening of power and influence of Russia and the convergence of Europe with the strategies of these two countries, provide many opportunities.

Seyyed Reza Mirtaher, referring to the UK measures to send heavy weapons to Ukraine, including the donation of 600 Brimstone 2 missiles and allocation of 14 advanced Challenger tanks, self-propelled guns and Bulldog armored vehicles. told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that Britain, as a strategic ally of the United States, has always played a prominent role in intensifying the hostility of the West against Russia, and the history of tensions between Russia and the UK is long.

He stated that the Russians consider the British to be one of their worst enemies and said that after the Cold War, despite the collapse of the Soviet Union and some improvements in their relations, there were many tensions between them, including the issue of the radioactive assassination of some Russian agents who had become refugees in the UK or were living in that country. This issue was one of the main causes of political-diplomatic tensions and even the expulsion of Russian diplomats and then the reciprocal expulsion of British diplomats from Russia.

This expert on international issues continued that these tensions between Russia and the UK continued, especially after Russia attempted to seize Crimea and annex it to its territory in 2014, and a serious confrontation between the West and Russia was created. And Moscow has always been incremental, and the war in Ukraine in February 2022 also created a turning point in this direction.

Referring to the actions taken by the West, especially the United States, during the Ukraine war against Russia, Mirtaher added that Britain, as a strategic ally of the United States, played an active role in this regard. Along with the US, they have sent the largest amount of arms aid to Ukraine. In 2022, Britain sent more than 2.3 billion dollars of weapons to Ukraine, and it is expected that this country will send another 3 billion pounds of weapons to Ukraine this year.

This analyst of international issues noted that at the same time, they have also made progress in sending tanks to Ukraine, and London’s action in sending advanced combat tanks is considered a turning point in the field of Western arms aid to Ukraine. In fact, Britain will be the first country to donate Western tanks to the armed forces of Ukraine, and Germany has so far refused to do so because it believes that Leopard tanks are offensive weapons, and has emphasized that Western tanks should only be delivered to Kiev by concluding an agreement between Ukraine’s main allies, especially with the US.

While referring to the British Defense Minister’s emphasis that Germany should also send heavy equipment, especially combat tanks, to Ukraine, he said that Edward Stringer, the former head of operations at the British Defense Headquarters, said that time is in Russia’s favor, so the West should intensify its support for Ukraine it in the coming months and abandon the caution it has taken about arms delivery.

“Naturally, it is expected that the UK, along with the United States, will take the lead in action against Russia and implement this decision in a few days. One of the dimensions of this action was the energy embargo. Britain has drastically reduced energy imports from Russia and in this regard has threatened other European countries to continue this path.”

This analyst of international issues stated that London, along with Washington, was a pioneer in supporting and leading the political-diplomatic campaign and psychological-propaganda war against Moscow, and most actions in this field were carried out in cooperation with the United States on the part of the United Kingdom. With the US, it has tried to continue and expand the scope of the war in Ukraine by sending huge amounts of all kinds of weapons, especially heavy weapons to Ukraine, and in this action it pursues the strategic goals of continuing the war in order to weaken Russia and create an international front against it.

Mirtaher stated that Britain wants to intensify the hostilities between Europe and Russia and to distance them as much as possible, and said that London has repeatedly expelled diplomats and sanctioned Russian officials, personalities and institutions, and of course this action has also brought Moscow’s counter reactions.

He emphasized that after the US, Britain has shown the highest hostility towards Russia and this issue has existed since the Cold War period. Even now, this effort has continued in a general and increasing manner. Big European countries, such as Germany and France, never wanted relations with Russia to reach an irreversible level and until the Ukraine war, they were willing to continue cooperation, especially in energy, industry and commercial interactions. While Britain and the US are acting completely against this idea and are trying to reduce Russia’s presence in European markets as much as possible and to reduce the level of Moscow’s relations with European countries as much as possible.

 

This international affairs analyst stated that the UK recently announced that a group of 9 countries, such as the UK, Poland and the Netherlands, have committed to pursuing an unprecedented set of arms donations to Ukraine, including advanced battle tanks.

Referring to London’s active diplomacy to provide as many weapons as possible, he pointed out that for the US and UK, the continuation of the war in Ukraine and turning it into a war of attrition, considering the weakening of Russia’s power and influence and the convergence of Europe with the strategies of these two countries, provides many opportunities and they can take advantage of this and use the convergence created in their future goals.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading