Foreign Policy Doctrine of Justice and Development Party towards Iran

2021/01/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments, within the historical context, have always been the main players in the region. Dr. Mohsen Eslami – Faculty member of Tarbiat Modarres University

With regard to the recent developments in Iran-Turkey relations and the remarks made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, it’s good to introduce a book written by Ahmet Davutoglu, one of the influential and effective figures of the Justice and Development Party.

Although there are differences between Davutoglu and Erdogan today, they are still known as the scientific and strategic elements of the Justice and Development Party. The title of the book is “Strategic Depth” and it somehow forms the ideology and foreign policy doctrine of the Justice and Development Party and the Islamist government of Turkey.

The main statement emphasized in this book by Davutoglu is that Turkey should not have any challenges with its neighbors and should be in zero tension with its neighboring countries.

Although this statement is an important principle in the foreign policy of Turkey and the Justice and Development Party, in the years after 2011 we saw that this foreign policy was changed by Erdogan who put a new policy on the agenda following which challenges shaped between Turkey and its neighbors. Turkey’s main challenge is related to Erdogan’s approach to Syria. According to this assumption, Davutoglu deals with Iran-Turkey relations in a chapter of the book and pays special attention to the relations between the two countries in the historical context.

He believes that the two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments in the historical context have always been the main players in the region. Iran and Turkey competed with each other for many years, especially during the Safavid and Ottoman rule; but these two powers always respect each other in their calculations.

Davutoglu has a very interesting analogy of the relations and positions of Turkey and Iran and compares it to the position of the two well-known European countries, Germany and France. He believes that just as Germany and France have had a very high position in Europe for centuries and built Europe through cooperation and competition, Iran and Turkey, like them, have their relations analyzed and evaluated. He goes on to emphasize that the Iranians throughout history have looked to Anatolia and the Turks to the Indian Ocean. This issue has led to the formation of competition between the two countries and consequently increased their experience.

Davutoglu goes on to say that the most stable borders in the region are Iran-Turkey border, which was formed in 1639 and the oldness of this border is even more than the oldness of the formation of the United States, Germany and the French Revolution.

In this comparison, he concludes that this is indicative of the antiquity of the relations between Tehran and Ankara.

With these interpretations, in his book “Strategic Depth”, Davutoglu speaks of Iran which, in the new post-revolution era, is respected in Turkey and has always been inspiring.

He also gives an example of the Turks being inspired by the Seljuk rule, and finally concludes that Turkey knows Iran and its power more than any other power; the two countries that have lived together for years.

This view, along with respect and inspiration, has always been considered by the Turks throughout history.

Another point which should be noted is that the Turks have had numerous military expeditions throughout history, but the existence and sovereignty of Iran has always been established and has not been affected by those expeditions of the neighboring government.

Finally, by elucidating Davutoglu’s famous book “Strategic Depth”, it can be concluded that politicians in Turkey, especially Erdogan, are well aware of the history of Iran and the relations between Iran and Turkey, and know the position of the two countries. That is why I was surprised by Erdogan’s speech in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Someone like Erdogan, who is familiar with history and knows about the relationship between Tehran and Ankara, should refer to what Davutoglu has written and reconsider his view. Recently, however, we have been witness to the expansion of Erdogan’s pendulum policy in Turkey, which is a threat to the country’s foreign policy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading