Foreign Policy Doctrine of Justice and Development Party towards Iran

2021/01/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments, within the historical context, have always been the main players in the region. Dr. Mohsen Eslami – Faculty member of Tarbiat Modarres University

With regard to the recent developments in Iran-Turkey relations and the remarks made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, it’s good to introduce a book written by Ahmet Davutoglu, one of the influential and effective figures of the Justice and Development Party.

Although there are differences between Davutoglu and Erdogan today, they are still known as the scientific and strategic elements of the Justice and Development Party. The title of the book is “Strategic Depth” and it somehow forms the ideology and foreign policy doctrine of the Justice and Development Party and the Islamist government of Turkey.

The main statement emphasized in this book by Davutoglu is that Turkey should not have any challenges with its neighbors and should be in zero tension with its neighboring countries.

Although this statement is an important principle in the foreign policy of Turkey and the Justice and Development Party, in the years after 2011 we saw that this foreign policy was changed by Erdogan who put a new policy on the agenda following which challenges shaped between Turkey and its neighbors. Turkey’s main challenge is related to Erdogan’s approach to Syria. According to this assumption, Davutoglu deals with Iran-Turkey relations in a chapter of the book and pays special attention to the relations between the two countries in the historical context.

He believes that the two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments in the historical context have always been the main players in the region. Iran and Turkey competed with each other for many years, especially during the Safavid and Ottoman rule; but these two powers always respect each other in their calculations.

Davutoglu has a very interesting analogy of the relations and positions of Turkey and Iran and compares it to the position of the two well-known European countries, Germany and France. He believes that just as Germany and France have had a very high position in Europe for centuries and built Europe through cooperation and competition, Iran and Turkey, like them, have their relations analyzed and evaluated. He goes on to emphasize that the Iranians throughout history have looked to Anatolia and the Turks to the Indian Ocean. This issue has led to the formation of competition between the two countries and consequently increased their experience.

Davutoglu goes on to say that the most stable borders in the region are Iran-Turkey border, which was formed in 1639 and the oldness of this border is even more than the oldness of the formation of the United States, Germany and the French Revolution.

In this comparison, he concludes that this is indicative of the antiquity of the relations between Tehran and Ankara.

With these interpretations, in his book “Strategic Depth”, Davutoglu speaks of Iran which, in the new post-revolution era, is respected in Turkey and has always been inspiring.

He also gives an example of the Turks being inspired by the Seljuk rule, and finally concludes that Turkey knows Iran and its power more than any other power; the two countries that have lived together for years.

This view, along with respect and inspiration, has always been considered by the Turks throughout history.

Another point which should be noted is that the Turks have had numerous military expeditions throughout history, but the existence and sovereignty of Iran has always been established and has not been affected by those expeditions of the neighboring government.

Finally, by elucidating Davutoglu’s famous book “Strategic Depth”, it can be concluded that politicians in Turkey, especially Erdogan, are well aware of the history of Iran and the relations between Iran and Turkey, and know the position of the two countries. That is why I was surprised by Erdogan’s speech in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Someone like Erdogan, who is familiar with history and knows about the relationship between Tehran and Ankara, should refer to what Davutoglu has written and reconsider his view. Recently, however, we have been witness to the expansion of Erdogan’s pendulum policy in Turkey, which is a threat to the country’s foreign policy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Erdogan’s Motives and Opportunities for Reconciliation with the Syrian Government

Strategic Council Online—An expert on Caucasus issues said that the Turkish Foreign Minister recently stated in a joint press conference with his Saudi counterpart: “Our current strategy is dialogue and peace, and we ask Iran and Russia to play a constructive role in this process.” According to these statements, Turkey’s policy towards Syrian refugees and its consequences have once again been considered.

Japan’s Goals of Strengthening Its Military Power in East Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Japan said: Strengthening Japan’s military activities is a 25-year plan to show that it is capable of becoming one of the military powers of the region and the world by relying on its military values and capabilities.

An Analysis of the Possible Approach of the New British Government in Foreign Policy

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on European issues said: The British Labor Party, led by Keir Starmer, won the election by winning an overwhelming majority of the seats in the House of Commons. On the other hand, the Conservative party, led by Rishi Sunak, has lost 170 seats and is on the way to its heaviest political defeat since the party was founded in the 19th century.

Unpredictable Consequences of a Possible Comprehensive Attack on Lebanon for the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Jordan emphasized that the possibility of the Zionist regime’s army attacking Lebanon is high and said it is unlikely the ceasefire negotiations and the release of prisoners will play a deterrent role in preventing the war between this regime and the Hezbollah, the consequences of which cannot be avoided.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Erdogan’s Motives and Opportunities for Reconciliation with the Syrian Government

Strategic Council Online—An expert on Caucasus issues said that the Turkish Foreign Minister recently stated in a joint press conference with his Saudi counterpart: “Our current strategy is dialogue and peace, and we ask Iran and Russia to play a constructive role in this process.” According to these statements, Turkey’s policy towards Syrian refugees and its consequences have once again been considered.

Japan’s Goals of Strengthening Its Military Power in East Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Japan said: Strengthening Japan’s military activities is a 25-year plan to show that it is capable of becoming one of the military powers of the region and the world by relying on its military values and capabilities.

An Analysis of the Possible Approach of the New British Government in Foreign Policy

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on European issues said: The British Labor Party, led by Keir Starmer, won the election by winning an overwhelming majority of the seats in the House of Commons. On the other hand, the Conservative party, led by Rishi Sunak, has lost 170 seats and is on the way to its heaviest political defeat since the party was founded in the 19th century.

Unpredictable Consequences of a Possible Comprehensive Attack on Lebanon for the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Jordan emphasized that the possibility of the Zionist regime’s army attacking Lebanon is high and said it is unlikely the ceasefire negotiations and the release of prisoners will play a deterrent role in preventing the war between this regime and the Hezbollah, the consequences of which cannot be avoided.

Loading