Foreign Policy Doctrine of Justice and Development Party towards Iran

2021/01/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments, within the historical context, have always been the main players in the region. Dr. Mohsen Eslami – Faculty member of Tarbiat Modarres University

With regard to the recent developments in Iran-Turkey relations and the remarks made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, it’s good to introduce a book written by Ahmet Davutoglu, one of the influential and effective figures of the Justice and Development Party.

Although there are differences between Davutoglu and Erdogan today, they are still known as the scientific and strategic elements of the Justice and Development Party. The title of the book is “Strategic Depth” and it somehow forms the ideology and foreign policy doctrine of the Justice and Development Party and the Islamist government of Turkey.

The main statement emphasized in this book by Davutoglu is that Turkey should not have any challenges with its neighbors and should be in zero tension with its neighboring countries.

Although this statement is an important principle in the foreign policy of Turkey and the Justice and Development Party, in the years after 2011 we saw that this foreign policy was changed by Erdogan who put a new policy on the agenda following which challenges shaped between Turkey and its neighbors. Turkey’s main challenge is related to Erdogan’s approach to Syria. According to this assumption, Davutoglu deals with Iran-Turkey relations in a chapter of the book and pays special attention to the relations between the two countries in the historical context.

He believes that the two governments of Iran and Turkey have been the two balanced, stable and important governments in the region for centuries, and these two governments in the historical context have always been the main players in the region. Iran and Turkey competed with each other for many years, especially during the Safavid and Ottoman rule; but these two powers always respect each other in their calculations.

Davutoglu has a very interesting analogy of the relations and positions of Turkey and Iran and compares it to the position of the two well-known European countries, Germany and France. He believes that just as Germany and France have had a very high position in Europe for centuries and built Europe through cooperation and competition, Iran and Turkey, like them, have their relations analyzed and evaluated. He goes on to emphasize that the Iranians throughout history have looked to Anatolia and the Turks to the Indian Ocean. This issue has led to the formation of competition between the two countries and consequently increased their experience.

Davutoglu goes on to say that the most stable borders in the region are Iran-Turkey border, which was formed in 1639 and the oldness of this border is even more than the oldness of the formation of the United States, Germany and the French Revolution.

In this comparison, he concludes that this is indicative of the antiquity of the relations between Tehran and Ankara.

With these interpretations, in his book “Strategic Depth”, Davutoglu speaks of Iran which, in the new post-revolution era, is respected in Turkey and has always been inspiring.

He also gives an example of the Turks being inspired by the Seljuk rule, and finally concludes that Turkey knows Iran and its power more than any other power; the two countries that have lived together for years.

This view, along with respect and inspiration, has always been considered by the Turks throughout history.

Another point which should be noted is that the Turks have had numerous military expeditions throughout history, but the existence and sovereignty of Iran has always been established and has not been affected by those expeditions of the neighboring government.

Finally, by elucidating Davutoglu’s famous book “Strategic Depth”, it can be concluded that politicians in Turkey, especially Erdogan, are well aware of the history of Iran and the relations between Iran and Turkey, and know the position of the two countries. That is why I was surprised by Erdogan’s speech in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Someone like Erdogan, who is familiar with history and knows about the relationship between Tehran and Ankara, should refer to what Davutoglu has written and reconsider his view. Recently, however, we have been witness to the expansion of Erdogan’s pendulum policy in Turkey, which is a threat to the country’s foreign policy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading