Behind the Scenes of US-Saudi Arms Deal

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A senior researcher of international affairs commenting on Joe Biden’s recent decision to sell arms to Saudi Arabia said: Since Joe Biden was opposed to the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and had also announced it, therefore his current move has raised questions; although his administration officials have told him that those weapons are defensive, not offensive.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said: When Joe Biden was elected President of the United States one of his policies was to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia in January 2020. Given the Democrats’ criticism of Saudi Arabia, especially after the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, adoption of such policy was not beyond expectation; but it was recently announced that the US State Department and the Pentagon had agreed to sell 280 air-to-air medium-range defensive missiles and about 596 launchers to Saudi Arabia. The arms deal came after a 500 million dollar deal to maintain Saudi helicopters was signed in September.

He added: On the other hand, the United States is apparently building some military installations in west of Saudi Arabia and has issued a tender announcement in this regard.

Saying that now the question is that why the Biden administration has now taken such a measure despite the suspension of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Ghahremanpour said: Officials of Biden’s administration have cited several reasons to justify the measure; the first reason was that they insisted that the agreement was in line with Biden’s policy of selling purely defensive weapons to Saudi Arabia; that is to say, while during the Trump term of office offensive weapons were also being sold, Biden insists that only defensive weapons should be sold to that country, and that those weapons should not be used against Saudi citizens or escalate the war in Yemen by the Saudis.

The senior researcher of the international and the Middle East affairs noted: In the big picture of that deal there is a major reason and that is the US reassurance to its allies in the region; that if the US military commitments in the region are reduced those allies will be able to defend themselves against threats. As in a statement issued on the occasion of the arms sale to Saudi Arabia, the US State Department spokesman explicitly stated that the purpose of selling the medium-range air-to-air missiles to Riyadh was that Saudi Arabia be able to defend itself against Houthi attacks.

He added: Therefore, it seems that the main objective of the United States in this action is to build trust with its allies so that they realize that they can ensure their security after the reduction of US commitments in the region.

The expert cited another reason for Biden’s move and said: About a month ago, simultaneous with the stalemate in the nuclear talks, it was announced that Washington wanted to take some steps to put some pressure on Iran and bring Tehran to the negotiating table. The argument was that the United States has negotiated with China to reduce oil purchases from Iran, and given that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel were the main opponents of returning to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), arms sales to Riyadh at such a juncture could mean that the United States is strengthening Saudi military power.

According to the expert, the US target is to persuade Saudi Arabia not to worry too much about its security and to warn Iran that if it does not return to the negotiating table and the JCPOA is not revived, the White House may increase sale of military weapons to its allies.

Ghahremanpour added: It is important now to see if such a policy will continue or if the sales will be limited to the same extent.

Referring to the role of Congress, he said: For the sale of those weapons to Saudi Arabia there is no need to obtain a congressional permit, but the Congress can block the sale permit. To date, there has been no news that the Congress has opposed this issue; but if the Congress opposes, the 650 million dollar deal that is being pursued by a private company will be finalized.

Explaining the consequences of such measure, Qahremanpour noted: One of the consequences of arms sales goes back to the Marib region in Yemen because that region is a strategic one and connects the east and the west of Yemen. There is a fierce battle between the Houthis and Mansour Hadi’s supporters. In such a situation, if the Houthis can capture Marib, they can easily go to east of Yemen.

He continued: It is not known yet whether the sale of that amount of missiles to Saudi Arabia could mean that the United States wants Riyadh to have the upper hand in the Marib? Because Saudi Arabia’s return to the Yemen peace negotiating table and agreement with such peace, depends on Saudi Arabia not losing the Marib.

Ghahremanpour pointed out that Riyadh seeks to gain the upper hand against the Houthis in that area and in the practical arena, and on the other hand, the Houthis are also trying to have the upper hand by taking Marib at the negotiating table, adding: Therefore, one hypothesis is that this arms deal could strengthen Saudi Arabia’s position in Marib. At the meantime, a State Department spokesman said the United States remained committed to ending the war in Yemen, and that the Americans were apparently justifying the issue by saying that they would be ready for peace if the Saudis gain the upper hand in that region. But it is not clear whether this will really happen or not.

In conclusion, he stressed that the sale of that amount of weapons to Saudi Arabia in the current situation may have psychological impact on the scene of Yemen war to some extent.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading