Behind the Scenes of US-Saudi Arms Deal

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A senior researcher of international affairs commenting on Joe Biden’s recent decision to sell arms to Saudi Arabia said: Since Joe Biden was opposed to the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and had also announced it, therefore his current move has raised questions; although his administration officials have told him that those weapons are defensive, not offensive.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said: When Joe Biden was elected President of the United States one of his policies was to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia in January 2020. Given the Democrats’ criticism of Saudi Arabia, especially after the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, adoption of such policy was not beyond expectation; but it was recently announced that the US State Department and the Pentagon had agreed to sell 280 air-to-air medium-range defensive missiles and about 596 launchers to Saudi Arabia. The arms deal came after a 500 million dollar deal to maintain Saudi helicopters was signed in September.

He added: On the other hand, the United States is apparently building some military installations in west of Saudi Arabia and has issued a tender announcement in this regard.

Saying that now the question is that why the Biden administration has now taken such a measure despite the suspension of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Ghahremanpour said: Officials of Biden’s administration have cited several reasons to justify the measure; the first reason was that they insisted that the agreement was in line with Biden’s policy of selling purely defensive weapons to Saudi Arabia; that is to say, while during the Trump term of office offensive weapons were also being sold, Biden insists that only defensive weapons should be sold to that country, and that those weapons should not be used against Saudi citizens or escalate the war in Yemen by the Saudis.

The senior researcher of the international and the Middle East affairs noted: In the big picture of that deal there is a major reason and that is the US reassurance to its allies in the region; that if the US military commitments in the region are reduced those allies will be able to defend themselves against threats. As in a statement issued on the occasion of the arms sale to Saudi Arabia, the US State Department spokesman explicitly stated that the purpose of selling the medium-range air-to-air missiles to Riyadh was that Saudi Arabia be able to defend itself against Houthi attacks.

He added: Therefore, it seems that the main objective of the United States in this action is to build trust with its allies so that they realize that they can ensure their security after the reduction of US commitments in the region.

The expert cited another reason for Biden’s move and said: About a month ago, simultaneous with the stalemate in the nuclear talks, it was announced that Washington wanted to take some steps to put some pressure on Iran and bring Tehran to the negotiating table. The argument was that the United States has negotiated with China to reduce oil purchases from Iran, and given that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel were the main opponents of returning to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), arms sales to Riyadh at such a juncture could mean that the United States is strengthening Saudi military power.

According to the expert, the US target is to persuade Saudi Arabia not to worry too much about its security and to warn Iran that if it does not return to the negotiating table and the JCPOA is not revived, the White House may increase sale of military weapons to its allies.

Ghahremanpour added: It is important now to see if such a policy will continue or if the sales will be limited to the same extent.

Referring to the role of Congress, he said: For the sale of those weapons to Saudi Arabia there is no need to obtain a congressional permit, but the Congress can block the sale permit. To date, there has been no news that the Congress has opposed this issue; but if the Congress opposes, the 650 million dollar deal that is being pursued by a private company will be finalized.

Explaining the consequences of such measure, Qahremanpour noted: One of the consequences of arms sales goes back to the Marib region in Yemen because that region is a strategic one and connects the east and the west of Yemen. There is a fierce battle between the Houthis and Mansour Hadi’s supporters. In such a situation, if the Houthis can capture Marib, they can easily go to east of Yemen.

He continued: It is not known yet whether the sale of that amount of missiles to Saudi Arabia could mean that the United States wants Riyadh to have the upper hand in the Marib? Because Saudi Arabia’s return to the Yemen peace negotiating table and agreement with such peace, depends on Saudi Arabia not losing the Marib.

Ghahremanpour pointed out that Riyadh seeks to gain the upper hand against the Houthis in that area and in the practical arena, and on the other hand, the Houthis are also trying to have the upper hand by taking Marib at the negotiating table, adding: Therefore, one hypothesis is that this arms deal could strengthen Saudi Arabia’s position in Marib. At the meantime, a State Department spokesman said the United States remained committed to ending the war in Yemen, and that the Americans were apparently justifying the issue by saying that they would be ready for peace if the Saudis gain the upper hand in that region. But it is not clear whether this will really happen or not.

In conclusion, he stressed that the sale of that amount of weapons to Saudi Arabia in the current situation may have psychological impact on the scene of Yemen war to some extent.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading