Behind the Scenes of US-Saudi Arms Deal

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A senior researcher of international affairs commenting on Joe Biden’s recent decision to sell arms to Saudi Arabia said: Since Joe Biden was opposed to the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and had also announced it, therefore his current move has raised questions; although his administration officials have told him that those weapons are defensive, not offensive.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said: When Joe Biden was elected President of the United States one of his policies was to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia in January 2020. Given the Democrats’ criticism of Saudi Arabia, especially after the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, adoption of such policy was not beyond expectation; but it was recently announced that the US State Department and the Pentagon had agreed to sell 280 air-to-air medium-range defensive missiles and about 596 launchers to Saudi Arabia. The arms deal came after a 500 million dollar deal to maintain Saudi helicopters was signed in September.

He added: On the other hand, the United States is apparently building some military installations in west of Saudi Arabia and has issued a tender announcement in this regard.

Saying that now the question is that why the Biden administration has now taken such a measure despite the suspension of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Ghahremanpour said: Officials of Biden’s administration have cited several reasons to justify the measure; the first reason was that they insisted that the agreement was in line with Biden’s policy of selling purely defensive weapons to Saudi Arabia; that is to say, while during the Trump term of office offensive weapons were also being sold, Biden insists that only defensive weapons should be sold to that country, and that those weapons should not be used against Saudi citizens or escalate the war in Yemen by the Saudis.

The senior researcher of the international and the Middle East affairs noted: In the big picture of that deal there is a major reason and that is the US reassurance to its allies in the region; that if the US military commitments in the region are reduced those allies will be able to defend themselves against threats. As in a statement issued on the occasion of the arms sale to Saudi Arabia, the US State Department spokesman explicitly stated that the purpose of selling the medium-range air-to-air missiles to Riyadh was that Saudi Arabia be able to defend itself against Houthi attacks.

He added: Therefore, it seems that the main objective of the United States in this action is to build trust with its allies so that they realize that they can ensure their security after the reduction of US commitments in the region.

The expert cited another reason for Biden’s move and said: About a month ago, simultaneous with the stalemate in the nuclear talks, it was announced that Washington wanted to take some steps to put some pressure on Iran and bring Tehran to the negotiating table. The argument was that the United States has negotiated with China to reduce oil purchases from Iran, and given that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel were the main opponents of returning to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), arms sales to Riyadh at such a juncture could mean that the United States is strengthening Saudi military power.

According to the expert, the US target is to persuade Saudi Arabia not to worry too much about its security and to warn Iran that if it does not return to the negotiating table and the JCPOA is not revived, the White House may increase sale of military weapons to its allies.

Ghahremanpour added: It is important now to see if such a policy will continue or if the sales will be limited to the same extent.

Referring to the role of Congress, he said: For the sale of those weapons to Saudi Arabia there is no need to obtain a congressional permit, but the Congress can block the sale permit. To date, there has been no news that the Congress has opposed this issue; but if the Congress opposes, the 650 million dollar deal that is being pursued by a private company will be finalized.

Explaining the consequences of such measure, Qahremanpour noted: One of the consequences of arms sales goes back to the Marib region in Yemen because that region is a strategic one and connects the east and the west of Yemen. There is a fierce battle between the Houthis and Mansour Hadi’s supporters. In such a situation, if the Houthis can capture Marib, they can easily go to east of Yemen.

He continued: It is not known yet whether the sale of that amount of missiles to Saudi Arabia could mean that the United States wants Riyadh to have the upper hand in the Marib? Because Saudi Arabia’s return to the Yemen peace negotiating table and agreement with such peace, depends on Saudi Arabia not losing the Marib.

Ghahremanpour pointed out that Riyadh seeks to gain the upper hand against the Houthis in that area and in the practical arena, and on the other hand, the Houthis are also trying to have the upper hand by taking Marib at the negotiating table, adding: Therefore, one hypothesis is that this arms deal could strengthen Saudi Arabia’s position in Marib. At the meantime, a State Department spokesman said the United States remained committed to ending the war in Yemen, and that the Americans were apparently justifying the issue by saying that they would be ready for peace if the Saudis gain the upper hand in that region. But it is not clear whether this will really happen or not.

In conclusion, he stressed that the sale of that amount of weapons to Saudi Arabia in the current situation may have psychological impact on the scene of Yemen war to some extent.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر