Behind the Scenes of US-Saudi Arms Deal

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A senior researcher of international affairs commenting on Joe Biden’s recent decision to sell arms to Saudi Arabia said: Since Joe Biden was opposed to the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia and had also announced it, therefore his current move has raised questions; although his administration officials have told him that those weapons are defensive, not offensive.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said: When Joe Biden was elected President of the United States one of his policies was to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia in January 2020. Given the Democrats’ criticism of Saudi Arabia, especially after the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, adoption of such policy was not beyond expectation; but it was recently announced that the US State Department and the Pentagon had agreed to sell 280 air-to-air medium-range defensive missiles and about 596 launchers to Saudi Arabia. The arms deal came after a 500 million dollar deal to maintain Saudi helicopters was signed in September.

He added: On the other hand, the United States is apparently building some military installations in west of Saudi Arabia and has issued a tender announcement in this regard.

Saying that now the question is that why the Biden administration has now taken such a measure despite the suspension of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Ghahremanpour said: Officials of Biden’s administration have cited several reasons to justify the measure; the first reason was that they insisted that the agreement was in line with Biden’s policy of selling purely defensive weapons to Saudi Arabia; that is to say, while during the Trump term of office offensive weapons were also being sold, Biden insists that only defensive weapons should be sold to that country, and that those weapons should not be used against Saudi citizens or escalate the war in Yemen by the Saudis.

The senior researcher of the international and the Middle East affairs noted: In the big picture of that deal there is a major reason and that is the US reassurance to its allies in the region; that if the US military commitments in the region are reduced those allies will be able to defend themselves against threats. As in a statement issued on the occasion of the arms sale to Saudi Arabia, the US State Department spokesman explicitly stated that the purpose of selling the medium-range air-to-air missiles to Riyadh was that Saudi Arabia be able to defend itself against Houthi attacks.

He added: Therefore, it seems that the main objective of the United States in this action is to build trust with its allies so that they realize that they can ensure their security after the reduction of US commitments in the region.

The expert cited another reason for Biden’s move and said: About a month ago, simultaneous with the stalemate in the nuclear talks, it was announced that Washington wanted to take some steps to put some pressure on Iran and bring Tehran to the negotiating table. The argument was that the United States has negotiated with China to reduce oil purchases from Iran, and given that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel were the main opponents of returning to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), arms sales to Riyadh at such a juncture could mean that the United States is strengthening Saudi military power.

According to the expert, the US target is to persuade Saudi Arabia not to worry too much about its security and to warn Iran that if it does not return to the negotiating table and the JCPOA is not revived, the White House may increase sale of military weapons to its allies.

Ghahremanpour added: It is important now to see if such a policy will continue or if the sales will be limited to the same extent.

Referring to the role of Congress, he said: For the sale of those weapons to Saudi Arabia there is no need to obtain a congressional permit, but the Congress can block the sale permit. To date, there has been no news that the Congress has opposed this issue; but if the Congress opposes, the 650 million dollar deal that is being pursued by a private company will be finalized.

Explaining the consequences of such measure, Qahremanpour noted: One of the consequences of arms sales goes back to the Marib region in Yemen because that region is a strategic one and connects the east and the west of Yemen. There is a fierce battle between the Houthis and Mansour Hadi’s supporters. In such a situation, if the Houthis can capture Marib, they can easily go to east of Yemen.

He continued: It is not known yet whether the sale of that amount of missiles to Saudi Arabia could mean that the United States wants Riyadh to have the upper hand in the Marib? Because Saudi Arabia’s return to the Yemen peace negotiating table and agreement with such peace, depends on Saudi Arabia not losing the Marib.

Ghahremanpour pointed out that Riyadh seeks to gain the upper hand against the Houthis in that area and in the practical arena, and on the other hand, the Houthis are also trying to have the upper hand by taking Marib at the negotiating table, adding: Therefore, one hypothesis is that this arms deal could strengthen Saudi Arabia’s position in Marib. At the meantime, a State Department spokesman said the United States remained committed to ending the war in Yemen, and that the Americans were apparently justifying the issue by saying that they would be ready for peace if the Saudis gain the upper hand in that region. But it is not clear whether this will really happen or not.

In conclusion, he stressed that the sale of that amount of weapons to Saudi Arabia in the current situation may have psychological impact on the scene of Yemen war to some extent.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading