US Responsibility for Attacking Civilian Vehicle in Afghanistan, Silence Of Intl. Organizations

2021/10/03 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An Afghan researcher and journalist, referring to the silence of the international community on the US crimes and attacks on civilian vehicle in Afghanistan, said: If human rights organizations and international forums break their silence, the US will be pressured for paying compensation to the survivors and for punishing the agents involved.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Seyed Abbas Hosseini, referring to the US confession on attacking a vehicle near Kabul airport in which 10 civilians, including seven children, were killed said: With people gathering at Kabul airport, the stance the US officials took at the White House and even the US ambassador to Kabul, showed that by managing the attack on Kabul airport they were attempting to reduce overcrowding and create more opportunity for their troops to leave Afghanistan while they attributed the measure to the ISIS.

Saying that the attacks which are carried out in Afghanistan in the name of ISIL are attacks planned by the United States and the name of ISIL is used only to cover them up and escape the responsibility, he added: The day after the suicide bombing at Kabul airport, the US warnings about the ISIS attack were repeated so that people would not rush to Kabul airport again, and the US, in order to perform its scenario, targeted a civilian vehicle carrying drinking water and the crime took place while children rushed to the car to welcome their father.

The analyst of Afghanistan affairs said: How is it possible that an American drone near the airport that had reconnaissance equipment could not detect drinking water! This issue cannot be technically and militarily justified by any argument! Even if there was a threat, there was no need to use a drone in the area surrounded by the US forces. They could neutralize any movement with their military vehicles and through simple operations.

Hosseini stressed that the United States seeks to demonstrate the ISIS as a threat in Afghanistan, adding: Disclosure of the details of that attack showed the US plans in this regard and the nature of the crimes of that country, and made it clear that the United States, in carrying out its own targets, will not show mercy even to its own soldiers.

Silence of intl. organizations regarding US crimes in Afghanistan

Referring to the role of international organizations in pursuing the US crimes in Afghanistan, he added: The United States has committed numerous crimes in Afghanistan, but none of the organizations and countries claiming human rights have objected to or pursued them. In one example, the previous government and the Afghan Human Rights Commission called on the public to file complaints on the Human Rights Commission’s website within a few months, and hundreds of cases of serious war crimes were filed, but with the embargo of the Chief Justice and the Attorney General at the Hague tribunal and his addition to the US blacklist, those efforts practically failed.

The analyst of Afghanistan affairs stressed: Under the current situation, any complaint will face the same fate. Meanwhile, the United States has not acceded to the most important UN human rights conventions and is not a member of the International Criminal Court. For this reason it is very difficult for the court to convince the United States to answer to those crimes. In fact, we do not see any serious efforts by the UN human rights bodies.

Failure of efforts of previous governments to pursue US crimes

Referring to other efforts made by the former Afghan government to pursue those crimes, he said: Unfortunately, the international community, which is very worried about the Taliban’s human rights crimes these days, has not expressed any concern over even one of the widespread crimes committed by NATO and the United States in Afghanistan; while by comparison, those crimes are far more widespread, and over the past 20 years we have witnessed hundreds of major crimes committed by US forces in Afghanistan. In one instance, they destroyed an entire village and wiped it out.

 Necessity to punish perpetrators, pay compensation to families of victims

The Afghan researcher and journalist stressed: If human rights organizations do not remain silent today, the United States will have to compensate the survivors of the car bombing near the airport, in addition to punishing the perpetrators; as they have also demanded this compensation.

He added: Those families should be able to bring their grievances to the international forums; as if we have had different examples in this regard; unfortunately, those examples did not reach the desired conclusion with the influence of NATO member states. However, it created a media environment in which the crime will not be forgotten for the years to come.

Hosseini continued: The United States apologizes in order to control of the media space and orders the follow-up, but there is no belief in that the Americans will investigate those crimes and bring the main perpetrators to justice. Of course, the reason is clear, because those attacks were organized and targeted by the American commanders themselves.

He cited the vast dimensions of the US atrocities in Afghanistan in various areas, adding: Recent statements by Americans about a mistake in attacking that vehicle have been mere pretense, and the victims’ families do not have the ability to sue without support and pursue their case in competent courts.

Commenting on the Taliban’s responsibility with regard to this attack and massacre of Afghan people, Hosseini referred to the statements of the group’s spokesman regarding the US responsibility for its crimes in Afghanistan and said: The Taliban has practically no means to pursue this issue in the international forums; unless an inclusive and legitimate government is formed in that country and it seriously pursues those complaints.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

Loading