Future Cooperation of Iraq & Russia on Energy Sector

2021/06/30 | Economy, Note, top news

Having enjoyed the extensive reserves of gas and oil, Iraq has always been an interesting country for foreign investors and well-known and major companies in the energy field. But political-security incidents and unrests of the country within the past few decades have made it hard and even sometimes impossible for activities in the energy field. Unlike other Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, not enough investment was made in Iraq especially in the energy sector.

Seyed Fo’ad Alavi, researcher of Russia and Central Asia, Bureau of Diplomatic/Economic Studies, Imam Sadeq (PBUH) University

But after the defeat of the ISIS terrorist group-let, and the return of a relative peace to the country, many companies expressed their readiness to cooperate and invest in the country and have already entered into the market. Effort has been made to review overly the Russian investor companies, Iraq’s energy market situation, and present problems of the market.

Iraq’s energy sector situation 

Iraq is one of the most important players of the world oil market. The proven reserve of oil in the country is 153 billion barrels (9% of the whole oil reserves of the world). Iraq is the fifth oil rich country of the world (followed by Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Canada and Iran). For example, oil production reached 4.465 million barrels per day in 2016, i.e. 10.8% more than its production in 2015. Iraq has a considerable gas reserves too. (Gas reserves explored in Iraq is amounted to 3.7 trillion cubic meters).

Oil industry in Iraq improved after 2010, when the government signed agreements with a number of trans-national companies for exploitation of Iraqi oil fields. Years later, there was a remarkable increase in oil production and export. According to director of Iraqi state-owned oil marketing company in September 2018, Iraqi oil export reached nearly to 3.595 million barrels per day.

Iraq & Russia Cooperation in Fuel & Energy Sectors  

Iraqi oil and gas sectors have been attractive for economic security of Russian Federation, because there are three Russian oil companies active in Iraq; Lukoil, Gazprom Neft and Bashneft. Russneft has also shows very much interest to Iraqi hydrocarbon industry. The productions are in West Ghourna-2 and Badra fields, exploration is in two blocks of oil in East, which so far proved to be promising.

Oil production in Badra started by Gazprom Neft on 31 May, 2014, (the field reached the nominal level of production on September 1 same year, which made the oil export possible with 15000 barrels per day. In autumn 2017, the Deputy Director of the Board of Gazprom Neft said the company expected to produce 85000 to 90000 barrels per day in 2018. He also underscored that the Company had updated the development plan of the Iraqi oil field and considered 110000 barrels per day as its target .Although the Company already intended to produce 115000 barrels per day.

The development of another big oil field in Iraq called West Ghourna-2 on December 12, 2009 started with a consortium including of Lukoil and Norwegian Statoil in tender for development right. In January 2013, an extra agreement was also signed for the contract to upgrade the production level to 1.2 million barrels per day, with maintenance period for 19 and half years and renewal term of the contract for 25 years. The official production of oil started on March 29, 2014. From mid-2015, the oil production of West Ghourna-2 was about 400000 barrels per day (or about 20 million tons per year). According to statistics available, by the end of 2016, Lukoil invested in West Ghourna-2 field 2.53 billion dollars, of which it benefitted 7.27 billion dollars.

In the meantime and despite the positive record of activities of Russian oil companies in Iraq, some of them (Russneft) failed in the market. It seems that the failure is due to weak expertise support of Russian fuel suppliers and underestimating the risks of Iraqi oil market.

Conclusion

Based on the analyses of Iraqi oil and gas sectors, one can conclude as follows:

First; despite the unstable political situation and weak state foundations, Iraq has managed to stabilize her situation in the world oil market during the past decade. As a full-fledge member of OPEC and Gas Exporting Countries Forum, Iraq managed to make decision and to be effective. Moreover, Iraqi extra advantages are her considerable oil and gas undeveloped reserves as well as low exploitation costs.

Second; Russian oil companies have made noticeable investments in Iraq, and have considerable presence in fuel and energy sectors of the country. Lukoil, Gazprom Neft and Bashneft have established good working relations with Iraqi government. In the meantime, there are serious risks for Russian oil and gas companies; the most important of which are known the complicated relations between the federal government in Baghdad and the autonomous region of Kurdistan as well as political instability along with inter-sect contradictions (Shi’ite- Sunni) plus social contradictions in Iraq.

Among Iraqi politicians and their foreign supporters, there are many individuals who are ready to take advantage from internal political problems to reach their own goals.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

Loading