Strategic Consequences of Formation of “Palestine Joint Operations Room”

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The recent battle between the Palestinian resistance groups and the Zionist regime, which ended after five days of conflict with the imposition of resistance conditions, had a remarkable phenomenon that was the formation of the "Joint Operations Room," because this Room played an effective role in the design of operations and field battles of the recent Gaza war. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

The leadership of the Gaza war, called “Revenge of the Free”, was shared with the operating Room. This Room, whose nature and military-operational features became more apparent in the recent developments of occupied Palestine, is the most prominent aspect of the unity and convergence of the Palestinian resistance groups.

This matter becomes important when we know that the Zionist regime and the media, political circles, and psychological operations related to it, in the past ten years, have made various efforts and scenarios for “split, conflict and division” between the Palestinian resistance groups, especially Hamas and the Islamic Jihad movement. 

The Palestinian Joint Operations Room (JOR) consists of 12 Palestinian groups under the leadership of Hamas, whose official military activity begins with the battle of “Saif al-Quds” in May 2021.

The initial core of the Joint Operations Room was founded in 2006 by two Palestinian resistance groups, namely “Izz al-Din al-Qassam,” the military wing of Hamas, and “Al-Quds Brigades,” the military wing of the Islamic Jihad movement. Forming a united resistance front to fight against the Zionist usurper regime, coordinating the activities of different Palestinian resistance groups, and developing a single political authority are this Room’s primary targets, which were emphasized in its founding document. The Joint Operations Room officially announced its existence in 2018 with the beginning of the “Great March of Return” in Gaza. 

Twelve Palestinian military branches are members of the Joint Operations Room.

In the short period of its activity since its establishment, the Joint Operations Room has successfully confronted the crimes of the Zionist regime in the occupied territories, especially in Gaza. Until now, the battle of Saif al-Quds was the climax of the “show of power” of the Joint Operations Room.

The Room played a significant role in “coordinating” various military elements and branches in the recent battle with the Zionist regime, as well as “ordering” the different fronts and managing the battle scene, and “preventing scattered reactions.” The most important consequence of the presence of the Joint Operations Room in the recent Gaza battle was “changing the balance of war” and imposing ceasefire conditions on the Zionist regime through national and field consensus, which is considered a “strategic success” of its kind.

The presence of 12 military branches from different Palestinian groups in the Joint Operations Room actually “strengthened the capabilities” of the Palestinian resistance, including missile and weaponry reserves, and as a result, the quantitative and qualitative improvement of missile attacks on key targets deep in the occupied territories.

The Zionist regime was pursuing “specific targets” in the recent Gaza battle and the crimes it committed in the days leading up to it. The Zionist leaders had designed a “complex equation” to target only the Islamic Jihad movement and keep other resistance groups out of the battle equation; as the brutal attack on the residence of 3 commanders of the Islamic Jihad and the destruction of the civilian homes were within this framework to follow unilateralization of the war against one of the Palestinian groups.

In addition, the Zionist regime tried to “reverse” the existing deterrence in the occupied territories to its advantage by intensifying attacks against Islamic Jihad, one of the important pillars of the Palestinian deterrence power, and creating an atmosphere of terror among Palestinians and other resistance groups.

The Zionist regime started the war with the idea that it would face only the Islamic Jihad in the new battle. But the timely and unified response of the Palestinian resistance groups in the form of the Joint Operation Room that had a “unique field unity” changed the atmosphere, the equation, and the outcome of the war, contrary to the objectives of the Zionist regime.

The role played by the Joint Operation Room in the battle of Gaza, which all resistance groups attended, is a denial of such insinuations and projections that some groups, including Hamas, do not have a severe presence on the field in the recent battles and have different perspectives from other resistance groups in the fight against the criminal regime.

In short, the Joint Operations Room is a “great achievement” in military and operational developments in occupied Palestine. Because from an operating point of view, carrying out joint attacks by Palestinian groups is not digestible for the Zionist regime because it destroys the security and military achievements of the regime.

Considering that the main focus of the Room’s activity is currently in Gaza, it seems to be very important to adopt mechanisms to expand the scope of the Room’s move to other areas, including the West Bank, to prepare the ground for the formation of the “United and Unified Palestinian Army.”

The experience of Yemen and the Ansarollah movement, which has a unified army, is a valuable experience that can also be implemented in Palestine. By forming a united and coherent army with a single command center, it can accelerate and intensify the fight against the Zionist regime and “with strategic victories,” in the medium term, practically target the existence of the criminal Zionist regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading