Strategic Consequences of Formation of “Palestine Joint Operations Room”

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The recent battle between the Palestinian resistance groups and the Zionist regime, which ended after five days of conflict with the imposition of resistance conditions, had a remarkable phenomenon that was the formation of the "Joint Operations Room," because this Room played an effective role in the design of operations and field battles of the recent Gaza war. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

The leadership of the Gaza war, called “Revenge of the Free”, was shared with the operating Room. This Room, whose nature and military-operational features became more apparent in the recent developments of occupied Palestine, is the most prominent aspect of the unity and convergence of the Palestinian resistance groups.

This matter becomes important when we know that the Zionist regime and the media, political circles, and psychological operations related to it, in the past ten years, have made various efforts and scenarios for “split, conflict and division” between the Palestinian resistance groups, especially Hamas and the Islamic Jihad movement. 

The Palestinian Joint Operations Room (JOR) consists of 12 Palestinian groups under the leadership of Hamas, whose official military activity begins with the battle of “Saif al-Quds” in May 2021.

The initial core of the Joint Operations Room was founded in 2006 by two Palestinian resistance groups, namely “Izz al-Din al-Qassam,” the military wing of Hamas, and “Al-Quds Brigades,” the military wing of the Islamic Jihad movement. Forming a united resistance front to fight against the Zionist usurper regime, coordinating the activities of different Palestinian resistance groups, and developing a single political authority are this Room’s primary targets, which were emphasized in its founding document. The Joint Operations Room officially announced its existence in 2018 with the beginning of the “Great March of Return” in Gaza. 

Twelve Palestinian military branches are members of the Joint Operations Room.

In the short period of its activity since its establishment, the Joint Operations Room has successfully confronted the crimes of the Zionist regime in the occupied territories, especially in Gaza. Until now, the battle of Saif al-Quds was the climax of the “show of power” of the Joint Operations Room.

The Room played a significant role in “coordinating” various military elements and branches in the recent battle with the Zionist regime, as well as “ordering” the different fronts and managing the battle scene, and “preventing scattered reactions.” The most important consequence of the presence of the Joint Operations Room in the recent Gaza battle was “changing the balance of war” and imposing ceasefire conditions on the Zionist regime through national and field consensus, which is considered a “strategic success” of its kind.

The presence of 12 military branches from different Palestinian groups in the Joint Operations Room actually “strengthened the capabilities” of the Palestinian resistance, including missile and weaponry reserves, and as a result, the quantitative and qualitative improvement of missile attacks on key targets deep in the occupied territories.

The Zionist regime was pursuing “specific targets” in the recent Gaza battle and the crimes it committed in the days leading up to it. The Zionist leaders had designed a “complex equation” to target only the Islamic Jihad movement and keep other resistance groups out of the battle equation; as the brutal attack on the residence of 3 commanders of the Islamic Jihad and the destruction of the civilian homes were within this framework to follow unilateralization of the war against one of the Palestinian groups.

In addition, the Zionist regime tried to “reverse” the existing deterrence in the occupied territories to its advantage by intensifying attacks against Islamic Jihad, one of the important pillars of the Palestinian deterrence power, and creating an atmosphere of terror among Palestinians and other resistance groups.

The Zionist regime started the war with the idea that it would face only the Islamic Jihad in the new battle. But the timely and unified response of the Palestinian resistance groups in the form of the Joint Operation Room that had a “unique field unity” changed the atmosphere, the equation, and the outcome of the war, contrary to the objectives of the Zionist regime.

The role played by the Joint Operation Room in the battle of Gaza, which all resistance groups attended, is a denial of such insinuations and projections that some groups, including Hamas, do not have a severe presence on the field in the recent battles and have different perspectives from other resistance groups in the fight against the criminal regime.

In short, the Joint Operations Room is a “great achievement” in military and operational developments in occupied Palestine. Because from an operating point of view, carrying out joint attacks by Palestinian groups is not digestible for the Zionist regime because it destroys the security and military achievements of the regime.

Considering that the main focus of the Room’s activity is currently in Gaza, it seems to be very important to adopt mechanisms to expand the scope of the Room’s move to other areas, including the West Bank, to prepare the ground for the formation of the “United and Unified Palestinian Army.”

The experience of Yemen and the Ansarollah movement, which has a unified army, is a valuable experience that can also be implemented in Palestine. By forming a united and coherent army with a single command center, it can accelerate and intensify the fight against the Zionist regime and “with strategic victories,” in the medium term, practically target the existence of the criminal Zionist regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading