US Troops Withdrawal from Germany and Escalation of EU Divergence

Strategic Council Online - An expert on European developments said that the withdrawal of US troops from Germany is a policy to intensify divergence in the European Union, adding that when part of the US military is to be concentrated in other European countries and long-term military ties and agreements are established with the US, political differences and divisions within the EU will increase.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referring to the German Chancellor’s opposition to the withdrawal of part of the US military from the country, Morteza Makki said: “On a larger scale, this withdrawal is a sign of a change in US security approach in Europe. The global community does not want this change of approach and still wants to maintain the NATO umbrella in Europe.

“This change in approach will widen the political and security divide within the EU and make it more difficult to reach consensus and adopt common strategic policies at the EU level,” he said, adding that the withdrawal did not mean US troop pullout from Europe but from Germany. Poland and other East European countries are trying to maintain the US military umbrella in Europe and give bases to the US, in the long run to avoid the security threat they feel from Russia, France and Germany and create a balance in the EU by maintaining the US security umbrella. The European affairs expert said the US move could maintain a rift in the EU as well as widen differences between Germany and the United States.

Referring to a statement by the German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas that even with Trump’s departure and the arrival of a Democratic president in the White House, the US-Germany dispute will not be easily resolved, Makki said: “They know that Trump’s policy towards Europe and the major EU states like Germany and France was followed by Bush Jr. and Obama in a different way but Trump has accelerated this policy shift.

US Same Policy towards Weakening of Europe

Referring to tensions between the United States and Russia over the creation of a missile defense shield in Europe under the Obama administration, which were modified by European efforts, he said: “In US governments, there is a difference only in the form of implementation of this policy. Under Obama, these changes were attempted with a multilateral policy and a long-term view, not with the momentum that Trump has pursued. There are objections to the withdrawal of some US troops from Germany only in the form of implementation, but there is no serious difference in its essence and nature.

Makki also called into question the NATO’s philosophy of existence after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Trump’s sharp and clear tone to Germany about the need to pay for security and increase its share of NATO’s military budget. The fact that Germany did not increase its NATO military budget as expected by Trump can also be one of the roots and factors of the Trump administration’s decisions to withdraw some US troops from Germany.

European Attempts to Achieve New Security Mechanism with US

Referring to John Bolton’s remarks that if Trump wins the election again, he will raise the issue of withdrawal from NATO, he said: “These issues show that under conditions that the Europeans have still not reached a security consensus themselves they would not want NATO security umbrella taken away because in a way, the disappearance of this umbrella will increase the political gap in Europe. They want the European security mechanism and arrangements to reach a positive point first, so that they can then reach a new conclusion about their security partnership with the Americans.

Regarding other reasons for Merkel’s opposition to the decision to withdraw US troops from Germany, the international affairs expert said: Many of these jobs will be lost, and as a result the German government will come under pressure from trade unions and some political currents because of its foreign policy approaches.

 

Political-Security Changes in Europe after US Troop Withdrawal from Germany

“What makes the European Union the most successful all-inclusive alliance in six decades is the consensus-building debate on which European governments are based,” Makki said, noting that the deployment of part of the US military in Eastern Europe would certainly change its political-security landscape. France and Germany, in particular, were able to advance the convergence process with all the failures and defeats they had in many processes, forming a union of 27 members. If this US policy goes well, it is entirely in the direction of creating divergence in the EU.

US Troops Pullout from Germany to Escalate EU Divergence Policy

He added: “If the US military were to leave Europe, perhaps the Europeans could easily build more consensus on foreign policy; because when there is no US and NATO security umbrella, the countries of Eastern Europe will definitely try to be more aligned with the axis countries of Europe, especially Germany and France; But when these forces are to be concentrated in the rest of Europe and long-term military ties and agreements are to be concluded with the United States, the situation will change, and this will increase political divisions within the EU.

Makki stressed: “As the gaps widen, the position of the European Union, France and Germany as the central powers of Europe will definitely diminish and the power and capacity of these two countries in the European Union will decrease. Meanwhile with the withdrawal of Britain from the EU will further aggravate the situation.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading