G20 Summit in Italy; Dominance of the Margins Over the Text

2021/11/10 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The first meeting of the leaders of Group of Twenty (G20) – leaders of 20 top economic powers in the world – was held in Rome, capital of Italy, on 30 and 31 October 2021, after the outbreak of the Coronavirus. Fatemeh Nekoo Lal Azad – Senior Researcher of Abrar Contemporary International Studies and Research Institute in Tehran

Given the specific titles and working groups defined for that international group, at the first glance it seems that economic issues and how to manage and solve global economic barriers should have been the axis of the G20 agenda. Of course, the process of world economic development after the relative control of the Coronavirus and also the process of global dealing with that disease and similar contagious diseases in the future was considered by the G20 summit as one of the obstacles to economic development of countries. But despite the aforementioned economic issues and issues such as reduction of corporate tax, it should be noted that at the recent G20 summit, the focus was on political and security issues.

In other words, although the summit of the world’s top 20 economies was expected to focus on economic issues and other issues on the sidelines, it was not at the recent G20 summit, and political issues cast a shadow on it. The objective sign of this claim is that both in the literature of the leaders present at the meeting and in the media reports, as well as in the analysis of intellectual circles and think tanks, the weight of political and security issues was much greater. The following are some important political issues raised at the G20 summit:

Restoration of France-US relations: In September, the United States and Britain signed an agreement with Australia called “AUKUS”, under which the United States and Britain pledged to provide a nuclear-powered submarine to Australia. The deal sparked tensions in relations of France with Britain, Australia and the United States, as previously an agreement had been signed between France and Australia under which France pledged to sell submarines to Australia. Australia canceled its agreement with France after signing the AUKUS agreement, declaring that it would prefer nuclear-powered submarines to conventional French submarines. France became very angry and summoned its ambassador.

The G20 summit provided an opportunity for Biden to meet with the French president and, referring to France as the most faithful ally of the United States, called the “AUKUS” agreement an “awkward” deal. The meeting, which took place a day before the Rome summit, received a great deal of attention of the media and intellectual and political circles. The joint meeting of the Presidents of France and the United States led to the issuance of a statement emphasizing the common interests and cooperation of the two countries in various fields. In fact, the meeting once again managed the tensions between European countries and the United States and strengthened the ties between the two sides of the Atlantic. After the meeting, the common positions of France and the United States on various issues such as Iran nuclear deal were highlighted.

Demonstration of a common front against Iran: Prior to the start of the G20 summit, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan announced that one of the main targets of Biden’s European trip (to Rome and then Glasgow) was to strengthen a common front against Iran due to delay in the restoration of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Western countries have cited Iran’s unpreparedness for the resumption of the Vienna talks as the main reason for the delay in JCPOA restoration. In line with this target, Biden met with the leaders of the three European member states of the JCPOA, Germany, France and Britain, to discuss the nuclear deal and other issues related to the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The outcome of Biden’s meeting with the leaders of the three European countries was the issuance of a special statement on the Islamic Republic of Iran, which demonstrated the unity and solidarity of the four Western countries against Iran. The importance of the statement for the United States is that it was issued on the possible eve of the start of negotiations between Iran and 4+1 on the one hand and the November meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the other hand. Many have this assessment that if Iran-West talks do not begin before the last meeting of the IAEA in November 2021, there is this possibility that at the forthcoming meeting of the Board of Governors Iran’s nuclear case will be referred to the UN Security Council one again.

Absence of Chinese President at G20 Summit: Although the Russian President did not attend the meeting and delivered a virtual speech, the Chinese President’s absence in the Rome Summit and then at the Climate Change Summit in Glasgow indicates tensions in relations between China and the West. China is dissatisfied with the US measures, such as signing of the AUKUS agreement with Australia, and criticizes the West’s Cold War view of itself. At the same time, presence of China, as an important economic and political power, is very essential in such meetings for solving common human problems. It is inconceivable that without China, common global issues such as Covid-19 or climate change could be managed.

In conclusion, it should be said that although economic and common human issues were discussed at the G20 summit, the reality is that political issues such as the one described above, as well as issues such as developments in Afghanistan, was more in the spotlight and in that meeting we were witness to the dominance of the margins over the text.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر