loader image

Collective engagement in the Caucasus; securing the interests of all regional countries

2021/10/13 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An analyst of the Caucasus issues says any efforts to change international borders and geopolitics of the region are considered as redline for Iran, adding that “it is expected that the emphasis of the Azerbaijan Republic on the 3+3 model of cooperation will be beyond the policies applied by this country and we would witness measures which would indicate this country is interested in collective and regional political cooperation instead of reliance on the Zionist regime or foreign powers”.

Ahmad Kazemi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the foreign minister of Azerbaijan Republic is interested in cooperating with Iran, Russia and Turkey.

He said that Elham Aliyev’s emphasis on cooperation between the three Caucasus countries and its three neighboring countries in the form of a model known as the 3 + 3 cooperation model is considered a positive stance.

“it is expected that the emphasis of the Azerbaijan Republic on the 3+3 model of cooperation is beyond the policies applied by this country and we would witness measures which would indicate this country is interested in collective and regional political cooperation instead of reliance on the Zionist regime or foreign powers.”

He added that considering what we have witnessed recently, including some strange behavior of the Republic of Azerbaijan, especially in relation to the movement of Iranian trucks on the Qapan-Goris road and Iran’s transit connection with Armenia and Georgia, optimism about the recent statement of the Azerbaijan President is difficult.

Azerbaijan’s transit restrictions violate international conventions

Kazemi said Azerbaijan’s behavior in creating restrictions for the movement of Iranian trucks to Armenia, Georgia and Russia is regrettable and unprecedented.

He added that this country has committed this act and arrested two Iranian drivers in a situation where, first, the main territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan with Nakhchivan has been connected through Iran for more than 30 years and the Republic of Azerbaijan freely and without hassle is transferring about 500 trucks a day of basic goods, fuel and equipment to Nakhchivan while the air corridor between Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan passes through Iran.

“It was expected that Azerbaijan would observe the rules and conventions of international relations vis-à-vis the strategic support of Iran to that country”.

 

Azerbaijan’s behavior against political, moral and good neighborliness principles

This analyst of the Caucasus issues said such behaviors by Azerbaijan is not compatible with any political, moral and good neighborliness principles, adding that “such conduct includes violations of a number of international conventions, including the Goods Transit Convention, which was ratified in 1956 and to which Armenia, the Republic of Azerbaijan and Iran are party. By doing so, the Republic of Azerbaijan has explicitly violated the Customs Convention on the International Transit of Goods, known as the ITI Convention, ratified in 1971 in Vienna.”

He added that Mr. Aliyev said that because that part of the Goris-Gapan road is located in the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the country has the right to impose taxes and customs duties; Apparently, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan is not even aware of the conventions to which his country is a party, and it shows that the Republic of Azerbaijan has acted on this basis for political purposes.

Kazemi said in political procedures, when countries want to make a new decision, they can announce it through official notes and channels, and violent action is not in line with any procedure. In such circumstances, one of the examples of the Republic of Azerbaijan’s adherence to the 3 + 3 model of cooperation, which is emphasized by them, can be the reconsideration of this action against the good neighborliness that they have done.

 

“It is expected that if the Republic of Azerbaijan adheres to this model of cooperation in practice, it would make changes in some approaches and reconsider the use of some words, one of which is refraining from using forged, baseless and fabricated terms such as “Zangzur corridor” which is a territorial claim to another country that is the Sionik Province and Maghri of Armenia.

He said if the Republic of Azerbaijan is really looking for transport lines and connecting roads in the region, instead of raising controversial and dubious issues, it should seek the real connection of the transportation hubs in the region, as if Armenia has also declared its readiness for the Republic of Azerbaijan to be able to use its roads and railways.

He added that before Mr. Aliyev, Mr. Erdogan had also emphasized this model, but the fact is that the 3+3 cooperation model is an Iranian initiative that was proposed by Iran more than two decades ago, and emphasis on the proposed Iranian model based on group interaction is considered a positive step.

Referring to the readiness of Azerbaijan to conduct border negotiations with Armenia, he said any attempt to change the international borders and change the geopolitics in the region is considered Iran’s red line and this red line has always been announced. On the other hand, the Secretary of the National Security Council of Armenia has stated that the country will not under any circumstances be subject to a plan that includes border changes or the so-called creation of corridors, and has announced readiness to negotiate with the Republic of Azerbaijan to open transport lines.

He said negotiation of transport lines is far from the imagination of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey with the focus on pan-Turkish plans.

“Countries in the region need to keep in mind that precisely defining borders is a time-consuming process; Despite the fact that more than 30 years have passed since the independence of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, many border areas of the Republic of Azerbaijan with Georgia are still not demarcated and there are disputes over some border points between the two countries as well as between Azerbaijan and Russia.”

The fact that the Republic of Azerbaijan seeks to determine its border with Armenia so quickly is different from its treatment of Georgia and Russia and may lead to other political analyzes, he said, adding that in this situation, Iran and Russia emphasize the restraint and patience of the countries in the region in determining the border lines by detailed technical and expert studies.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading