Trump’s Trip to India; Pitched for Elections with Little Achievement

2020/03/07 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: In new US documents, India has been mentioned to be part of the Pacific in order to lessen China's role in the region; so Washington seeks to highlight New Delhi's role in order to pit India against China on the one hand and contain Pakistan on the other. Amir Ali Abolfatah – Experts on American Affairs

US President Donald Trump arrived in New Delhi last Monday on his first official visit to India; a trip that despite Trump’s efforts to show it was important did not bear much fruit for Washington.

It should be said on the significance of this trip that India is an important country for the United States and has a billion-dollar market. India has also recently become the world’s fifth-biggest power, surpassing Britain and France. It has great potential for economic and trade cooperation.  Meanwhile, India can play a balancing role against China; a country the US considers an immediate and significant threat. Indeed, the United States seeks to harness China using all its capabilities, and one of its tools is to strengthen India’s regional and international role versus China.

In new US documents, India has been mentioned to be part of Pacific to lessen China’s role in the region; so Washington seeks to underline New Delhi’s role to pit India against China on the one hand and contain Pakistan on the other.

This is while for many years Pakistan had been the US security priority and Washington pursued Islamabad’s demands and aspirations. However, since Trump entered the White House, the US has adopted a critical attitude towards Pakistan and regarded it as a country supporting terrorists and extremists. Trump has also repeatedly threatened to cut off aid to Islamabad. Along with it, during Trump’s visit, there was talk on cooperation with India against terrorism, which could also beef up pressure on Pakistan.

However, it remains to be able to assess how effective these plans and orientations are and whether they can contain what India and the US call extremism. In the meantime, the US is also very important to India and has great potential for New Delhi. Moreover, the visit is of importance to both sides from other dimensions; first, India can enjoy Washington’s economic cooperation in the face of US rivalry against China and the US dependence on Pakistan’s politics may be reduced, too.

It should be noted, however, that as Donald Trump and his advisers proclaimed before paying the visit to India that there would be a fundamental breakthrough in the bilateral relations; we did not see any particular development. At the same time, despite Mr Narendra Modi’s widespread and unprecedented welcome rendered to Trump, the outcomes of the visit were not as good as the publicity launched before the trip showed.

No trade deal was signed during Trump’s visit to India, promising it would happen after the 2020 election; whether that deal could be reached is questionable.

The visit included an arms deal that is insignificant in proportion to the two countries’ share of the arms market; a $3 billion deal is not a significant figure for the United States, which is one of the world’s largest arms exporters, and India, one of the largest arms buyers.

This is while the figures released during US officials visits to Arab countries or vice versa are very high, reaching $110 billion during Trump’s trip to Riyadh.

So it can be said that the trip was not practically a remarkable achievement, yet it was politically and pragmatically important for Trump. Trump’s widespread welcome in Delhi and the use of the podium at the Motera Cricket Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, were as if he was speaking at an election rally.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading