Oil Price Outlook

2020/05/06 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online: Given the agreement reached to reduce oil supply by the OPEC Plus States and the possibility of reducing the impact of the corona crisis on demand, oil prices are expected to rise in the next two to three months. Mohammad Sadegh Jokar - Energy Expert

Following the outbreak of the coronavirus in the world, there has been a significant drop in real oil demand, which has reduced the price of black gold by about 70% since the beginning of the current Christian year (2020).

The state of the international oil market under the energy market has been affected by components of some structural changes over the past few years. This structural change in the international oil market has led to a significant change in the state of energy security to the detriment of suppliers and to the advantage of consumer countries. The bulk of these structural components were in the area of ​​declining demand for conventional fossil fuels. In the supply sector, there was the issue of unconventional oil supply, or shale oil, which had increased a lot.

This has led to an imbalance in the oil market and a decline in oil prices, which has led to a decrease in global demand in some countries and even a reversal of supply. Unconventional oil production in the United States has led to an oversupply of demand, so in short, due to the diversity and increase in supply, we have seen a drop in oil prices. In other words, as of 2016 first OPEC members and later OPEC Plus including Russia tried to reduce supply so that oil prices would rise as well as their incomes.

Thus, before 2020, the supply and demand of oil were such that OPEC Plus member states reduced their output several times.

So even if the corona crisis had not occurred today, the market situation would be such that we would see more supply in the oil market in 2020. But shale oil alone has increased output by 1,370,000 barrels. This prompted OPEC Plus countries, whose agreement lasted until March 3, 2018, to offer Saudi Arabia a proposal to cut production by another 1.5 million barrels from early March.

 

 

Of this amount, one million was supposed to be from OPEC and 500,000 from Russia, but these countries themselves did not accept this and the Russians announced that they did not want to continue the process of the last three years. According to Moscow, they should have reduced their market share to increase oil prices, but on the other side there was a country like the United States that benefited from this situation, that is rising prices. As a result, at the March 2020 summit, Saudi Arabia and Russia disagreed and moved toward a battle to increase supply. Riyadh hoped that with the increase in supply, oil prices would fall and Russia would suffer. According to Saudi officials, their economies are stronger because of foreign exchange reserves, and in the meantime, Russia will lose money and will be forced to reach an agreement with Saudi Arabia and continue the agreement with OPEC Plus.

Under these circumstances, at the height of the crisis, between March and April, Saudi Arabia increased its output to 12.5 million barrels per day, and then Russia and even Saudi allies increased their output. Besides, following this oil dispute, we have seen corona’s impact on global demand and declining demand.

In short, the issue can be summarized as follows:

  1. Even if the corona crisis had not occurred, the global supply would have continued this year and prices would not have risen too much.
  2. The corona crisis exacerbated the structural changes that led to the surplus and pushed prices below $20.
  3. Competition between Saudi Arabia and Russia has greatly intensified this trend from March to April.

Finally, given the agreement reached to reduce oil supply by OPEC countries and the possibility of reducing the impact of the corona crisis on demand, oil prices are expected to rise in the next two to three months.

Of course, the OPEC Plus agreement faces two uncertainties; the first is the implementation of this agreement. It should be noted that under this agreement, countries such as Canada and the United States should also reduce their production by a total of about 3.7 million barrels. Of course, the mechanism of this agreement is not very clear, and it is not stated on paper how much each country should reduce production and supply. This is a challenge for countries like the United States and Canada, whose oil companies are private. The second uncertainty is that it is not clear whether this will be enough to increase prices if this rate is reduced.

Given these two uncertainties, prices are likely to rise somewhat and stay in the $30- $40 range. In this case, a large part of the two most costly US and Canadian oils will be forced out of the market.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

SCFR’s Statement Regarding the Gaza Ceasefire

Strategic Council Online: The Strategic Council on Foreign Relations (SCFR), in a statement, congratulated the heroic Palestinian nation, the members of the Axis of Resistance, and all freedom-loving people across the world on the occasion of the Gaza ceasefire. Addressing the Palestinians, SCFR stated: “You have once again proven that the will of nations cannot be suppressed by military force.”

Consequences of Recent Military Border Tension between Pakistan and Afghanistan

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The recent military border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan have characteristics that completely distinguish them from the process of increasing and gradual conflict between the two countries over the past three and a half years and even before that. Their consequences make it necessary for the neighboring countries to consult.

US Objectives and Strategy for Revival of ISIS in the Region

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the dominance of armed groups in Syria and the possible intensification of political, military, and security chaos in the country on the one hand and widespread foreign interventions on the other, the risk of ISIS revival has become stronger not only in Syria but also in the country’s surroundings, including Iraq.

Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Approach to the Syrian Interim Government

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues assessed the visit of the Syrian Interim Government’s Foreign Minister to Saudi Arabia as a progressive and important step, saying: Contrary to some news and analysis about Saudi Arabia’s agreement and support for the new developments in Syria and the formation of an interim government by Syrian opposition forces, the Riyadh government has serious concerns and worries about the future of this government.

US National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia and Its Contradictory Practices

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The US National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia, apparently to justify and explain policies to defend the rights of racial minorities, especially Muslims living in the United States, was unveiled by the White House on December 12, 2024, in a situation where world public opinion has been witnessing with astonishment for more than a year the unprecedented increase in the shipment of deadly weapons and the full-scale political, legal, international and media support of the United States for the genocide and the commission of heinous crimes by the occupying and child-killing Israeli regime in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and other parts of the occupied territories against Palestinians, mainly civilians, women, children, the elderly, journalists, hospitals and all vital centers and infrastructures of the residents of the occupied territories.

Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Germany’s Support for the Zionist Regime in the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After the end of World War II, Germany was among the European governments that did the most “good service” to the Zionist regime; the reason for this is quite clear. Germany considers itself “indebted” to the Zionist regime because of Hitler’s behavior and actions towards the Jews. Therefore, in order to compensate for Hitler’s actions and “gain the trust” of the Zionists and at the same time “benefit from the Jewish lobby,” it did not neglect any service to Tel Aviv.

Trump’s Return to the White House and Scenarios for Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Trump’s return to the White House has confronted Ukraine and its European supporters with important questions: Will the United States continue to provide weapons and financial support to Kiev, or, as Trump claims, will peace prevail in Ukraine-Russia relations? If an agreement is reached to end the war, what will be the fate of Ukraine’s lost territories? Will peace be a lasting agreement, or will it pave the way for another major conflict? These questions have not yet received a clear answer.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

SCFR’s Statement Regarding the Gaza Ceasefire

Strategic Council Online: The Strategic Council on Foreign Relations (SCFR), in a statement, congratulated the heroic Palestinian nation, the members of the Axis of Resistance, and all freedom-loving people across the world on the occasion of the Gaza ceasefire. Addressing the Palestinians, SCFR stated: “You have once again proven that the will of nations cannot be suppressed by military force.”

Consequences of Recent Military Border Tension between Pakistan and Afghanistan

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The recent military border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan have characteristics that completely distinguish them from the process of increasing and gradual conflict between the two countries over the past three and a half years and even before that. Their consequences make it necessary for the neighboring countries to consult.

US Objectives and Strategy for Revival of ISIS in the Region

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the dominance of armed groups in Syria and the possible intensification of political, military, and security chaos in the country on the one hand and widespread foreign interventions on the other, the risk of ISIS revival has become stronger not only in Syria but also in the country’s surroundings, including Iraq.

Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Approach to the Syrian Interim Government

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues assessed the visit of the Syrian Interim Government’s Foreign Minister to Saudi Arabia as a progressive and important step, saying: Contrary to some news and analysis about Saudi Arabia’s agreement and support for the new developments in Syria and the formation of an interim government by Syrian opposition forces, the Riyadh government has serious concerns and worries about the future of this government.

US National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia and Its Contradictory Practices

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The US National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia, apparently to justify and explain policies to defend the rights of racial minorities, especially Muslims living in the United States, was unveiled by the White House on December 12, 2024, in a situation where world public opinion has been witnessing with astonishment for more than a year the unprecedented increase in the shipment of deadly weapons and the full-scale political, legal, international and media support of the United States for the genocide and the commission of heinous crimes by the occupying and child-killing Israeli regime in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and other parts of the occupied territories against Palestinians, mainly civilians, women, children, the elderly, journalists, hospitals and all vital centers and infrastructures of the residents of the occupied territories.

Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Germany’s Support for the Zionist Regime in the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After the end of World War II, Germany was among the European governments that did the most “good service” to the Zionist regime; the reason for this is quite clear. Germany considers itself “indebted” to the Zionist regime because of Hitler’s behavior and actions towards the Jews. Therefore, in order to compensate for Hitler’s actions and “gain the trust” of the Zionists and at the same time “benefit from the Jewish lobby,” it did not neglect any service to Tel Aviv.

Trump’s Return to the White House and Scenarios for Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Trump’s return to the White House has confronted Ukraine and its European supporters with important questions: Will the United States continue to provide weapons and financial support to Kiev, or, as Trump claims, will peace prevail in Ukraine-Russia relations? If an agreement is reached to end the war, what will be the fate of Ukraine’s lost territories? Will peace be a lasting agreement, or will it pave the way for another major conflict? These questions have not yet received a clear answer.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر