Oil Price Outlook

2020/05/06 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online: Given the agreement reached to reduce oil supply by the OPEC Plus States and the possibility of reducing the impact of the corona crisis on demand, oil prices are expected to rise in the next two to three months. Mohammad Sadegh Jokar - Energy Expert

Following the outbreak of the coronavirus in the world, there has been a significant drop in real oil demand, which has reduced the price of black gold by about 70% since the beginning of the current Christian year (2020).

The state of the international oil market under the energy market has been affected by components of some structural changes over the past few years. This structural change in the international oil market has led to a significant change in the state of energy security to the detriment of suppliers and to the advantage of consumer countries. The bulk of these structural components were in the area of ​​declining demand for conventional fossil fuels. In the supply sector, there was the issue of unconventional oil supply, or shale oil, which had increased a lot.

This has led to an imbalance in the oil market and a decline in oil prices, which has led to a decrease in global demand in some countries and even a reversal of supply. Unconventional oil production in the United States has led to an oversupply of demand, so in short, due to the diversity and increase in supply, we have seen a drop in oil prices. In other words, as of 2016 first OPEC members and later OPEC Plus including Russia tried to reduce supply so that oil prices would rise as well as their incomes.

Thus, before 2020, the supply and demand of oil were such that OPEC Plus member states reduced their output several times.

So even if the corona crisis had not occurred today, the market situation would be such that we would see more supply in the oil market in 2020. But shale oil alone has increased output by 1,370,000 barrels. This prompted OPEC Plus countries, whose agreement lasted until March 3, 2018, to offer Saudi Arabia a proposal to cut production by another 1.5 million barrels from early March.

 

 

Of this amount, one million was supposed to be from OPEC and 500,000 from Russia, but these countries themselves did not accept this and the Russians announced that they did not want to continue the process of the last three years. According to Moscow, they should have reduced their market share to increase oil prices, but on the other side there was a country like the United States that benefited from this situation, that is rising prices. As a result, at the March 2020 summit, Saudi Arabia and Russia disagreed and moved toward a battle to increase supply. Riyadh hoped that with the increase in supply, oil prices would fall and Russia would suffer. According to Saudi officials, their economies are stronger because of foreign exchange reserves, and in the meantime, Russia will lose money and will be forced to reach an agreement with Saudi Arabia and continue the agreement with OPEC Plus.

Under these circumstances, at the height of the crisis, between March and April, Saudi Arabia increased its output to 12.5 million barrels per day, and then Russia and even Saudi allies increased their output. Besides, following this oil dispute, we have seen corona’s impact on global demand and declining demand.

In short, the issue can be summarized as follows:

  1. Even if the corona crisis had not occurred, the global supply would have continued this year and prices would not have risen too much.
  2. The corona crisis exacerbated the structural changes that led to the surplus and pushed prices below $20.
  3. Competition between Saudi Arabia and Russia has greatly intensified this trend from March to April.

Finally, given the agreement reached to reduce oil supply by OPEC countries and the possibility of reducing the impact of the corona crisis on demand, oil prices are expected to rise in the next two to three months.

Of course, the OPEC Plus agreement faces two uncertainties; the first is the implementation of this agreement. It should be noted that under this agreement, countries such as Canada and the United States should also reduce their production by a total of about 3.7 million barrels. Of course, the mechanism of this agreement is not very clear, and it is not stated on paper how much each country should reduce production and supply. This is a challenge for countries like the United States and Canada, whose oil companies are private. The second uncertainty is that it is not clear whether this will be enough to increase prices if this rate is reduced.

Given these two uncertainties, prices are likely to rise somewhat and stay in the $30- $40 range. In this case, a large part of the two most costly US and Canadian oils will be forced out of the market.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading