Vague Prospect of China-US Summit Agreements

2023/12/07 | interview, political

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A faculty member of the Institute of Strategic Studies said that it should be seen whether the Chinese will violate the agreement to re-establish military relations with the United States due to Biden’s calling Xi Jinping a dictator, added: If once again they conclude that establishment of relations between the military forces of the two countries should be delayed, it shows that the recent meeting between the two presidents has not been successful.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mehdi Shapouri considered the recent meeting between the presidents of China and the United States as a new beginning for the relations between the two countries after two years of tension and stated: After the visit of the former speaker of the US House of Representatives to Taiwan, relations between the two countries became tense and the flight of Chinese balloons over the US soil added to the tensions to the extent that in the past two years, political relations of the two countries reached the lowest level since the end of the Cold War.

Recalling that under such conditions, the level of trade relations not only did not decline but also increased during the Biden period, he said: In the military field, the two countries have significant differences in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, and in this context, security tensions also prevail among them. After the visit of the then-speaker of the US House of Representatives to Taiwan and the incident of Chinese balloons, relations between the two countries’ military forces were broken, and tensions increased.

Stating that it should be seen whether the recent meeting can reduce the high level of tension created during the two years, the analyst of strategic issues said that the main issue in that meeting was the management of tensions and cooperation on common global affairs and noted: Issues such as controlling the negative consequences of artificial intelligence, environmental problems, and contagious diseases are among the global issues that the two countries want to work on. What has been very important for the US and what they tried to achieve in their relations with China during the past two years was the restoration of relations between the two countries’ military forces.

Shapouri continued: The disconnection between the militaries of the two countries had raised the possibility of miscalculations and misunderstandings between them in the South China Sea and around Taiwan, and this concern existed especially on the American side that as a result of misunderstandings or misconceptions, the differences between the two countries will enter the stage of military crisis. But based on what was announced, they concluded such relations should be restored. Of course, this achievement was one of the goals that the Americans were looking for, and the Chinese did not want to do it.

The researcher of the Institute of Strategic Studies pointed to the negotiations between the two countries about controlling the negative consequences of artificial intelligence and added that China and the United States are seeking to prevent its destructive effects on the relations between the two countries and the world by managing the negative consequences of artificial intelligence. In any case, they must move towards negotiations; if they do not cooperate, both sides will suffer many losses due to tensions and differences in their relations.

While referring to the discussions on the issues of the global environment and the control of contagious diseases, Shapouri recalled that such cooperation had reached a low level. Even the environmental cooperation between China and the United States was cut off after the tension in relations escalated, and its consequences were considered destructive for the whole world. Previous experience showed that the meeting between the two presidents could not reduce tensions and manage differences. The events prevented the effectiveness of the last meeting between the two countries’ presidents. Even now, although the two countries have to cooperate on some issues and agree on managing tensions, it is still impossible to say whether the agreements will lead to a practical result.

He listed the control of the drug problem as another issue raised in the meeting between Biden and Xi Jinping. He continued: In recent years, it has been discussed that the Chinese are the leading supplier of chemicals for the production of a type of drug that is produced in Mexico and sold in the United States. The US has become sensitive towards this issue, and topics discussed between the two presidents show that the Chinese president has agreed to pursue this issue. If this issue is implemented, it will be a significant success for the United States.

Recalling that the President of China declared that Taiwan is the biggest and most dangerous issue facing the relations between the two countries, Shapouri pointed to Biden’s emphasis on the previous position of the United States in this regard and stated: The United States claims that there is no change in the policy of “one nation, two states” regarding Taiwan and if China does not put pressure on Taiwan, the same approach will continue.

He referred to the news published about the negotiations between China and the United States regarding the Zionist regime’s war against the Resistance in Gaza and asking China to talk with Iran to prevent the spread of the war, as well as about Iran’s nuclear program, and added: The two countries, despite their differences, agree on one thing which is not to let the Iran nuclear issue turn into a regional crisis. Talks have also been held regarding Ukraine, and China’s position has been intermediate. So far, the US is probably satisfied with the continuation of this approach, and China, despite the Russians’ wishes, does not want to change its approach.

He considered the implementation of the agreements to be dependent on the developments that would happen in the relations between the two countries. Referring to Biden calling Xi Jinping a dictator after meeting with him, he stated: It should be seen whether the Chinese would violate the agreement to reestablish military relations because of such remarks by Mr. Biden or not if they once again conclude that establishment of relations between the military forces of the two countries should be delayed, it shows that the meeting was not successful.

Emphasizing that there are severe differences between the two countries and the verbal tensions in the relations between the two countries will increase. Still, it is unlikely that the vocal tensions will lead to field conflicts, he added: Biden, this time, unlike the previous time when in response to a reporter who asked if he still considers Xi Jinping as a dictator, he replied yes, explained that the Chinese political system is different from the American political system. It seems that by giving such explanations, he showed that he had moderated his positions a bit compared to the previous time. In any case, such statements are not acceptable to the Chinese, as the agreements made after last year’s meeting did not bring any results or improve the relations between the two countries. In general, the differences between the two countries do not disappear, and at most, the two countries can reach temporary compromises. However, this situation has made the relations between the two countries more unpredictable.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading