Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

The Palestinian resistance has so far destroyed more than 110 tanks and personnel carriers in the axes of the conflict and killed about 250 Zionist forces. According to the field data, the northern half of Gaza, which has a population of about 1.7 million and is the densest part of Gaza, is the main center of conflicts.

Also, by entering the central area of Gaza, which lacks natural barriers, forest cover, and dense residential buildings, the Zionist regime is trying to create a gap between the north and south of Gaza to give morale to its defeated army and frighten the resistance forces and put them in a tight spot!

The main pressure of the Zionist army is in the three axes of the northeast, northwest, and north, but so far, it has not advanced more than 2 kilometers in the north of Gaza. The Salah al-Din road, which is 45 kilometers long and connects the south and the north of Gaza, is currently under the control of the Zionists. The areas under control, where the Zionist regime’s armored forces are present with heavy equipment, have not yet been stabilized, and the resistance fighters are heavily involved with the Zionist military.

Despite the entry of the Zionist regime army into areas in Gaza and the attempt to create a middle gap in it, the prospect and continuation of the operation, which the Zionists seek to expand, is facing serious doubts.

The geopolitics and the position of the Palestinian Resistance in Gaza are such that it does not allow the Zionist army to survive there even for a short period; therefore, the areas it has occupied are temporary, and the Zionist regime is forced to withdraw from Gaza.

The fact that the Zionist regime has announced that it seeks to destroy Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and military battalions in Gaza is an unattainable target. Annihilation of the Islamic Resistance Movement of Hamas, which, in addition to its military and combat capabilities, especially in the field of asymmetric and urban battles, is particularly popular among more than 2 million residents of Gaza, is a big claim and more like a dream. This claim is much bigger and beyond the capabilities and military and security calculations of the Israeli regime in occupied Palestine.

Now that the Zionist army has entered Gaza in a limited way, it is on the verge of a “strategic disaster.” it is natural that the expansion of the scope and intensity of the ground war adds to the depth and scope of Israel’s strategic defeat in Gaza.

At the same time, the excessive density of Gaza, such a way that about 5,300 people are living in each square kilometer, the full awareness of Hamas over its geography, the long and deep tunnels throughout Gaza, which are about 500 kilometers long, and their identification and destruction has become an unsolvable mystery for the Zionist regime, the extraordinary popularity of Hamas among the people of Gaza due to the services and valuable work it has done, the view of the people of Gaza to the usurpers as their number one enemy, the sensitivity of the Resistance Front in the region to the crimes of the Zionists in Gaza and the pressure of world public opinion are among the important reasons that show the prospect of continued military operations in Gaza with failure.

Previously, some senior American commanders who had seen the strength and capabilities of the Islamic Resistance Front in the region had warned the Zionist leaders about this issue. General McKenzie, the former commander of CENTCOM in the region, in a recent interview with the ABC news channel, called the operation in Gaza the most challenging and worst type of war operation in the history of the Zionist regime, which Israel should avoid because of the population density and high buildings of this city!

Even the Zionists are aware of this issue. Although they have started the military invasion of Gaza in a limited way and so-called step by step, they see themselves in an act that began with the influence of the extreme Zionist elements and has no choice but to continue.

In any case, there is 100 percent agreement on two issues in the decision-making body of the Zionist regime, in which fascist and extremist elements are also effectively present: one, there should not be a large-scale ground attack; two, in any situation the operation should continue at a limited level and with a small depth and scope to achieve even tactical gains.

In fact, the situation of the Zionist cabinet is such that to compensate for the field failures in the face of the Palestinian resistance and Hamas, and to reduce the pressure of radical and extremist elements and movements, and to gain a winning card, it is even satisfied with the realization of a few minor tactical achievements in Gaza so that can use it in any possible negotiations related to the ceasefire. It goes without saying that the Zionist regime’s hands are currently empty for talks with Hamas.

But regarding the consequences of the situation that we see in Gaza today, it should be emphasized that continuation of the ground attack on Gaza will, in the first step, strengthen the three distinct and dangerous fronts, namely, northern Palestine by Hezbollah, Yemen by Ansarollah, and Syria by the resistance in that country directly against the Zionist regime which has been opened for some time. The noteworthy point is that the initiative on all three fronts is in the hands of the Islamic Resistance, and the Zionist regime is in a weak position.

Considering the effective, decisive, and obvious role that the Americans have in the Gaza war, the field and military threats against the bases and gathering centers of the Americans in Iraq and Syria will be intensified at a higher level. Suppose the United States and the Zionist regime insist on continuing the ground invasion in Gaza. In that case, the region’s American economic and commercial centers may also be included in the target list.

In addition, with the continuation of the war in Gaza, the pressure of public opinion in the region and also in Western countries has been intensified, and the resulting consequences, especially at the political and legal levels, will add to the problems of the Zionist regime even after the end of the war.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Loading