The Necessity of Professional and Non-Political Approach of the IAEA towards Iran’s Nuclear Program

2021/09/29 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of international issues says even though the International Atomic Energy Agency has emphasized that it is seeking constructive engagement with Iran, due to pressures by the White House and the Zionist regime, and allegations leveled against Iran, the behavior of the IAEA towards Iran is non-professional and non-technical and is becoming politically-motivated, which is a misguided and wrong attitude.

Abed Akbari told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the Director General of the IAEA emphasized after the recent session of the Executive Board of the IAEA in Vienna in connection with his visit to Tehran and meetings he held with new Iranian officials that the agency is keen on continuing constructive engagement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

“Rafael Grossi said talks with President Raisi’s government is important for developing cooperation between Iran and the Agency and the settlement of the standing problems. He also requested that talks continue concerning keeping equipment required for the study and monitoring of Iran’s nuclear activities by the IAEA inspectors and the extension of memory cards for recording devices such as cameras and other issue of difference.”

Akbari pointed out that in recent days, there have been arguments about the possibility of adopting strict approaches to put pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran to “return under pressure” to the negotiating table. He added that “despite the positive approach of the Iranian government to continue negotiations with the IAEA, it seems that in the new term of the IAEA management, for reasons such as pressure from the White House and the Zionist regime on this organization and submitting alleged documents against our country, the IAEA’s behavior towards Iran is not professional and technical and has taken a political side, which is a wrong and unconstructive approach.”

This international affairs expert said “it was with this approach that a few months before and before the meeting of the Board of Governors, for the first time since the signing of the JCPOA, the agency took a planned action and without any legal or technical justification, submitted a political and unwelcomed report on the Islamic Republic’s interaction with the agency. Following this report, the European Troika, in a scenario coordinated with the United States, presented a draft of an anti-Iranian resolution based on the alleged documents of the Zionist regime to the IAEA Board of Governors, in order to publish the first negative report on Iran’s activities under the JCPOA.”

He stressed that such behavior of the IAEA and its directors would definitely reduce Iran’s motivation to cooperate and would not be considered an interactive approach in any way.

According to this expert, the Islamic Republic of Iran has not forgotten that after the issue of UN Security Council Resolution 1737, despite its responsibility and duty, the IAEA refused to provide technical assistance to Iran in various projects, and thus, while using this assistance as a tool, the agency involved political and non-professional considerations in their presentation.

“This political approach to technical issues stemmed from the Security Council’s political decisions and calls into question its credibility, competence and impartiality,” Akbari stressed.

He pointed out that according to Article 3 of the IAEA Statute, “if this body encounters issues that fall within the competence of the Security Council, it will inform the Council as responsible for maintaining international peace and security.” He explained that none of the IAEA Director General’s reports described Iran’s nuclear activities as a threat to international peace and security. “Therefore, the referral of the case to the Security Council had no legal basis and was purely politically motivated.”

Akbari added that “according to the previous paragraph, the technical, professional and non-political view towards Iran’s nuclear program is not a choice, but a necessity. Achieving this will both attract more cooperation from Tehran and prove the independence and impartiality of the IAEA profession.”

“The necessity of this approach is doubled at a time when Iran, according to JCPOA and in response to the other side’s non-compliance, has reduced its obligations and despite the non-implementation of the Additional Protocol, adheres to the general requirements of the IAEA and the other side is trying to use the IAEA again as a tool to fabricate crisis.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading