Dimensions of German Genocide in Namibia, Acceptance of Responsibility

2021/06/09 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Nearly one hundred years after the mass killing of the Herero and Nama tribes by German troops during the Namibian occupation, German Foreign Minister Haiku Moss officially acknowledged the atrocities committed by the German military in Namibia and the “genocide” in that country. According to the minister, Germany’s goal is to erase the memory of the massacres from the minds of the survivors of the victims. ‘We are pleased to be able to reach an agreement with Namibia on dealing with the darkest part of our common history. Recognizing this negligence and our request for compensation is an important step in repairing the remnants of this crime’. Mahmoud Fazeli - International affairs analyst

German foreign minister said Germany will pay 1.1 billion euros for the reconstruction and development of that country for the genocide that took place between 1904 and 1908, Of course, he added, the financial assistance for the development of Namibia should not be considered as compensation and the damage from a legal point of view. This money must be paid within 30 years and above all for projects in the areas where the two tribes of Herero and Nama are residing. At the request of the Namibian government, the money will be used for land reform, including the purchase and expansion of agricultural land, rural infrastructure, water supply and job creation.

The German government emphasizes that recognizing the genocide and establishing an emergency aid fund for Namibia does not mean a legal claim for the survivors to receive compensation, but only a moral and political duty. The agreement is by no means the end of the past, but it is an “important step” towards redressing the crimes and building a future together. Germany apologizes for committing the genocide.

Germany’s official apology is expected to be delivered by President Frank-Walter Steinmeier during a visit to Namibia and address to the parliament. The acceptance of German atrocities in Namibia was announced a day after France apologized for its responsibility for the Rwandan genocide.

Namibia was a colony of the German Empire from 1884 to 1915. The empire ruled part of southwestern Africa as a colony of the “Southwest Africa of Germany”. The colony, which was half the size of the mainland of the German Empire in Europe, was inhabited by a small number of Germans. German domination of the region was accompanied by numerous uprisings. In 1894, a group of people from the two ethnic groups revolted against the German colonialists, killing more than a hundred of their men.

In response, German forces defeated the rebels in the battle and drove them into the desert, where many died of thirst. Thousands of the insurgents were subsequently taken captive and sent to the concentration camps, most of whom died of disease, harassment, and exhaustion. After the beginning of the riots and unrest in Germany, the inhabitants of the colony, especially the Hereros, sent General Lothar von Trotta to suppress the protests and ordered the massacre of the protesters. The suppression of those uprisings by the Germans was brutal and violent. The order was to destroy everyone, men, women and children. Many were sent to encamped camps. This massacre is in fact the first genocide of the twentieth century committed by Germany in an African country. The members of the Nama tribe revolted a year after the repressions, and the same fate befell on them. The atrocities and killings in Namibia during German colonial rule have strained relations between the two countries for many years.

Between 1904 and 1908, the Nama and the Herero tribes revolted in response to the seizure of their lands by German colonial troops. It is estimated that between 65,000 and 80,000 members of the Herero tribe and 10,000 to 20,000 members of the Nama tribe were killed during the genocide. Those crimes were declared genocide by the United Nations in 1948. After the end of the World War I, a report on the catastrophes of German colonialism was prepared, but it was soon put in a stagnant archive under the title “White Alliance”.

The governments of Germany and Namibia have been in talks since 2015 to recognize genocide, apologize and pay compensation. The German government stressed in 2016 that there was no compensation in the negotiations, as was the case with Holocaust victims. The Namibian government has welcomed Germany’s decision to accept genocide, saying people cannot forget the killings, but that Germany’s action is a healing to the wounds of the survivors.

In Namibia, victims’ associations have objected to the outcome of Germany’s negotiations with Namibia, calling it insufficient in exchange for the blood of their ancestors and seeking direct compensation. They believe that the money that Germany has allocated to those projects will actually go to the Namibian government. Opposition parties in Namibia have called the German government’s offer an insult to the Namibian people, calling it a coup by the German government and a betrayal by the Namibian government. Vekuii Rukoro, a leader of the Herero tribe, does not accept the agreement between the Namibian government and Germany because the representatives of the victims were not present at the talks, and the Namibian government has “betrayed” the victims’ relatives and the 1.1 billion euro that Germany is giving will not go to the victims’ survivors and will be spent on public projects. The money is to be spent on infrastructure as well as training in areas where the two tribes live. This financial assistance is not intended to pave the way for legal compensation as demanded by the survivors. This is Germany’s highest per capita contribution to development in Africa.

In 2018, Germany returned the remains of 27 victims to Namibia. The skulls of the victims were transported to Germany to be used to prove racist theories of European superiority over Africans and other races. Ms. Petra Bose-Huber, bishop of the Protestant Church, addressed a prayer service at Frederic Church in Berlin before handing over the remains of the bodies Germany had taken out of Namibia during the colonization of that country. “We, together with the survivors of the victims, will keep that era alive and work openly to recognize the massacre and to overcome the injustice done by German colonialism and to continue this situation after that time.”

Representatives of the two ethnic groups staged peaceful demonstrations at the same time as the bodies were handed over. The demonstrators complained about the very low compensation paid to the survivors of the victims of this genocide. The remains of bodies that Germany had taken out of that country during the exploitation of Namibia were kept in anthropological collections in several German cities.

Like many other genocides in the world by colonial powers, its perpetrators and agents refuse to pay direct compensation to the survivors. Germany is concerned that any compensation to the victims could open the door to other countries in the world, including Greece. Nearly 80 years after Germany invaded Greece in World War II, Greece is pushing for negotiations on German reparations for its damage to the country during the war. On April 6, 1941, Germany invaded Greece and Yugoslavia. By 1944, German forces carried out many massacres in Greece. Tens of thousands of Greek civilians were killed in the war. A Greek parliamentary commission has estimated the damage caused by the war waged in that country by Germany at, at least 289 billion euros.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading