loader image

Dimensions of German Genocide in Namibia, Acceptance of Responsibility

2021/06/09 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Nearly one hundred years after the mass killing of the Herero and Nama tribes by German troops during the Namibian occupation, German Foreign Minister Haiku Moss officially acknowledged the atrocities committed by the German military in Namibia and the “genocide” in that country. According to the minister, Germany’s goal is to erase the memory of the massacres from the minds of the survivors of the victims. ‘We are pleased to be able to reach an agreement with Namibia on dealing with the darkest part of our common history. Recognizing this negligence and our request for compensation is an important step in repairing the remnants of this crime’. Mahmoud Fazeli - International affairs analyst

German foreign minister said Germany will pay 1.1 billion euros for the reconstruction and development of that country for the genocide that took place between 1904 and 1908, Of course, he added, the financial assistance for the development of Namibia should not be considered as compensation and the damage from a legal point of view. This money must be paid within 30 years and above all for projects in the areas where the two tribes of Herero and Nama are residing. At the request of the Namibian government, the money will be used for land reform, including the purchase and expansion of agricultural land, rural infrastructure, water supply and job creation.

The German government emphasizes that recognizing the genocide and establishing an emergency aid fund for Namibia does not mean a legal claim for the survivors to receive compensation, but only a moral and political duty. The agreement is by no means the end of the past, but it is an “important step” towards redressing the crimes and building a future together. Germany apologizes for committing the genocide.

Germany’s official apology is expected to be delivered by President Frank-Walter Steinmeier during a visit to Namibia and address to the parliament. The acceptance of German atrocities in Namibia was announced a day after France apologized for its responsibility for the Rwandan genocide.

Namibia was a colony of the German Empire from 1884 to 1915. The empire ruled part of southwestern Africa as a colony of the “Southwest Africa of Germany”. The colony, which was half the size of the mainland of the German Empire in Europe, was inhabited by a small number of Germans. German domination of the region was accompanied by numerous uprisings. In 1894, a group of people from the two ethnic groups revolted against the German colonialists, killing more than a hundred of their men.

In response, German forces defeated the rebels in the battle and drove them into the desert, where many died of thirst. Thousands of the insurgents were subsequently taken captive and sent to the concentration camps, most of whom died of disease, harassment, and exhaustion. After the beginning of the riots and unrest in Germany, the inhabitants of the colony, especially the Hereros, sent General Lothar von Trotta to suppress the protests and ordered the massacre of the protesters. The suppression of those uprisings by the Germans was brutal and violent. The order was to destroy everyone, men, women and children. Many were sent to encamped camps. This massacre is in fact the first genocide of the twentieth century committed by Germany in an African country. The members of the Nama tribe revolted a year after the repressions, and the same fate befell on them. The atrocities and killings in Namibia during German colonial rule have strained relations between the two countries for many years.

Between 1904 and 1908, the Nama and the Herero tribes revolted in response to the seizure of their lands by German colonial troops. It is estimated that between 65,000 and 80,000 members of the Herero tribe and 10,000 to 20,000 members of the Nama tribe were killed during the genocide. Those crimes were declared genocide by the United Nations in 1948. After the end of the World War I, a report on the catastrophes of German colonialism was prepared, but it was soon put in a stagnant archive under the title “White Alliance”.

The governments of Germany and Namibia have been in talks since 2015 to recognize genocide, apologize and pay compensation. The German government stressed in 2016 that there was no compensation in the negotiations, as was the case with Holocaust victims. The Namibian government has welcomed Germany’s decision to accept genocide, saying people cannot forget the killings, but that Germany’s action is a healing to the wounds of the survivors.

In Namibia, victims’ associations have objected to the outcome of Germany’s negotiations with Namibia, calling it insufficient in exchange for the blood of their ancestors and seeking direct compensation. They believe that the money that Germany has allocated to those projects will actually go to the Namibian government. Opposition parties in Namibia have called the German government’s offer an insult to the Namibian people, calling it a coup by the German government and a betrayal by the Namibian government. Vekuii Rukoro, a leader of the Herero tribe, does not accept the agreement between the Namibian government and Germany because the representatives of the victims were not present at the talks, and the Namibian government has “betrayed” the victims’ relatives and the 1.1 billion euro that Germany is giving will not go to the victims’ survivors and will be spent on public projects. The money is to be spent on infrastructure as well as training in areas where the two tribes live. This financial assistance is not intended to pave the way for legal compensation as demanded by the survivors. This is Germany’s highest per capita contribution to development in Africa.

In 2018, Germany returned the remains of 27 victims to Namibia. The skulls of the victims were transported to Germany to be used to prove racist theories of European superiority over Africans and other races. Ms. Petra Bose-Huber, bishop of the Protestant Church, addressed a prayer service at Frederic Church in Berlin before handing over the remains of the bodies Germany had taken out of Namibia during the colonization of that country. “We, together with the survivors of the victims, will keep that era alive and work openly to recognize the massacre and to overcome the injustice done by German colonialism and to continue this situation after that time.”

Representatives of the two ethnic groups staged peaceful demonstrations at the same time as the bodies were handed over. The demonstrators complained about the very low compensation paid to the survivors of the victims of this genocide. The remains of bodies that Germany had taken out of that country during the exploitation of Namibia were kept in anthropological collections in several German cities.

Like many other genocides in the world by colonial powers, its perpetrators and agents refuse to pay direct compensation to the survivors. Germany is concerned that any compensation to the victims could open the door to other countries in the world, including Greece. Nearly 80 years after Germany invaded Greece in World War II, Greece is pushing for negotiations on German reparations for its damage to the country during the war. On April 6, 1941, Germany invaded Greece and Yugoslavia. By 1944, German forces carried out many massacres in Greece. Tens of thousands of Greek civilians were killed in the war. A Greek parliamentary commission has estimated the damage caused by the war waged in that country by Germany at, at least 289 billion euros.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading