Behind the Recent Saudi Cabinet Reshuffle

2019/01/07 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: The new changes in the Saudi cabinet will not be very deep and widespread and we should not expect a tangible turn in Saudi foreign policy vis-à-vis the Yemeni crisis or Iran-related issues. Dr. Rahman Ghahramanpour - Senior Middle East Researcher

The Saudi cabinet witnessed a major reshuffle at the end of 2018; Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir was ousted by the Saudi king and his seat was given to Ibrahim al-Assaf, a former finance minister. From now on, Adel al-Jubeir will serve as the State Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Also dismissed was Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, the ambassador of Riyadh in London. The Saudi King also appointed Abdullah bin Bandar bin Abdulaziz as Chief of the National Guard. Among other changes in the cabinet was the appointment of Hamad al-Shaikh as the education minister.

Apparently, these changes are undoubtedly influenced by the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. As for the consequences of these changes perhaps the repercussions are more important than the reshuffle itself. Because in Saudi Arabia, this kind of changes do not take place by democratic means, and most of the work is done through consensual decisions within the ruling Royal Family. And today the ruling establishment is more focused on Mohammed bin Salman and King Salman.

Therefore, the decisions are made within a restricted circle and do not have democratic roots. For this reason, the decision’s outcome is more important than the decision itself. Nonetheless, in democracies, the most important part is the people involved in creating, suspension or bargaining around a decision. But in non-democratic systems such as Saudi Arabia, the consequences of decision making are more important than the forces affecting the decision-making process. Because you can speculate about them.

From this angle, the removal of Adel al-Jubeir could suggest that Saudi Arabia, and more specifically Mohammed bin Salman and the King, are seeking to bring about changes in foreign policy orientations in the region, in particular with regard to the issues of Yemen, Iran, Turkey, and the UAE-Saudi coalition. As to what these changes are and how extensive they would be is something the passage of time will decide.

But at the current stage, it can be analyzed that these changes will not be very deep and widespread and we should not expect a tangible shift in Saudi foreign policy vis-à-vis the Yemeni crisis or Iran-related issues.

In more simple words, the change of the Saudi foreign minister does not mean a sudden change in Riyadh’s foreign policy towards Tehran and opting for reconciliation. Likewise, Saudi Arabia is not expected to fully change its policy towards Turkey and Yemen. Meantime, it can be guessed that Mohammed bin Salman or the King are looking to make some changes, albeit limited.

Simply put, we should consider the range of these changes to be very small. There is no doubt about the principle of change in Saudi foreign policy, but the extent of these changes will certainly be limited. Because the conservative Saudi establishment has also shown in the past that it is basically reluctant to make sudden and profound changes, and the Saudi political system cannot tolerate a wide range of changes.

With the removal of Adel al-Jubeir and appointment of a more economy-minded foreign minister, Saudi rhetoric and harsh statements (made by the sacked foreign minister) against Iran would subside and Saudi elites would have a chance to help somewhat reduce the war of words with countries such as Iran and Turkey. In other words, by adopting such policies, they are trying to improve the badly tarnished international image of Saudi Arabia over the brutal murder of Khashoggi.

But beyond this decision, there is no strong will on behalf of the Saudis to quit their regional ambitions. It seems Riyadh’s decision to become a strategic actor in the region is a long-term and calculated choice. Therefore, these changes cannot be taken as a policy shift by the Saudis. Meanwhile, it is clear that Saudi Arabia is faced with challenges to achieve this demand. Therefore, the change of the foreign minister may be seen as a tactical move by Bin Salman to lessen the pressure from the international community and the regional countries over the Khashoggi murder and create a respite for the Crown Prince. This will also provide the Crown Prince with an opportunity to work in a peaceful environment to attain his goal, namely turning Saudi Arabia into an effective regional power.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading