China’s Cautious Move to Boost Relations with Afghanistan

2020/07/30 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The Chinese are very serious about improving relations with Afghanistan and have clear policies, but as long as the Americans are in Afghanistan, it looks like Beijing will move with caution. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi - Expert on Subcontinent Affairs

After a general agreement was reached between Pakistan and China called “One-Road One Belt” under which China invested about $65 billion in Pakistan, the idea of construction of a road from Qaraqorum to Karachi and from Karachi to the port of Gwadar known as Makran Road built by the Chinese was raised. In fact, the Chinese are building a highway from Kashgar, the capital of Xinjiang, to Kashmir and Karachi, and from Karachi to Gwadar.

On the other hand, a gas and oil pipeline and railway are to connect Gwadar to Kashgar. This means that the projects that China is implementing in the region, because they are very large and cover many areas, make Pakistan very dependent on China.

Even at the time that the question of “One Road One Belt” was raised, the issue came up as to what position Afghanistan would take in the context of a major project envisioned by the Chinese. It was during Hamed Karzai’s presidency that serious negotiations began between Afghanistan and China, and the Aynak copper mine, the largest in Afghanistan, was handed over to China. In addition, contracts were signed between Kabul and Beijing for the development of oil and gas in the Sheberghan region of northern Afghanistan.

In fact, China is very cautious, given that it feels it’s competing with the Americans over the “One Road One Belt” project and that the United States still has a military presence in Afghanistan and may sabotage development of relations. Although agreements have been signed between Afghanistan and China, Beijing has delayed the implementation of these agreements and is waiting to see where the US situation in Afghanistan will lead. In fact, the Chinese want to get in and invest in Afghanistan whenever the US presence in Afghanistan becomes clear, in the same way that they have invested in Pakistan.

So the geopolitical argument is that the Chinese have included in their plans about 55 Asian, African, Middle Eastern and European countries in “One Road One Belt” project to invest in boosting development in these areas.

As for Afghanistan, as mentioned, the Chinese are very serious and have clear policies, but as long as the Americans are in Afghanistan, it seems that Beijing will continue to be cautious.

Finally, there are a few important points as to why China wants to expand its cooperation with Afghanistan, especially to advance economic investment, especially within the “One Road One Belt” project and the port of Gwadar; First, Afghanistan has a lot of underground resources and China needs them; therefore, it will make a long-term investment in this region.

Another issue is that China and Afghanistan share a 56-kilometer border in the Wakhan region, and Beijing’s main concern is that the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, which was also involved in the Syria and Iraq wars and sided with ISIS, is moving to Afghanistan. These forces, some of whom were part of ISIS leaders, are now entering areas leading to the Fergana Valley, jeopardizing both Russia’s security interests and those of China; Therefore, another reason for Beijing’s proximity to Kabul is to get some kind of guarantee from the Taliban that if this group (Taliban) comes to power in Afghanistan, it will not allow the East Turkestan Movement to move from Afghanistan to Xinjiang and endanger the Chinese national security. Thus, China considers both political and economic and security considerations in its proximity to Afghanistan.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading