Alignment of US-Europe Positions in G7 Meeting

2021/05/15 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on Europe affairs, with regard to the most important topics raised in the three-day talks of foreign ministers of the Group of Seven in London said: The Coronavirus issue, the containment of China and Russia, and the revival of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) have been among the most important issues of the talks.

Morteza Makki, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, added: The session of foreign ministers in London was somehow for preparing the agenda for the G7 summit.

According to the expert, the most important issue raised at the summit was the far-reaching implications of the Coronavirus pandemic, which has had many economic consequences for the growth and development of countries, especially the G7 states.

The expert on Europe affairs continued: Another issue that was very prominent at the summit was the issue of restraining the power of China and Russia.

He explained: Given the rise of the Democrats to power in the United States, the rest of the members of Group of Seven at the recent summit have been more in tune with US militant and racist policies. Donald Trump’s positions and views over the past four years have been as such that members of the Group of Seven have sought to distance themselves from Trump’s policies, and for this reason the group’s meetings during the Trump term have had little effect in practice; but at the recent summit, we were witness to more cooperation and support from members of the Group of Seven, or the bloc of Western developed countries.

Noting that the United States is trying to cooperate with other G7 countries as part of its policy of containment of China and later control of Russia on its borders, Makki added: It is somehow felt that Western governments, especially European countries like Germany and France, Britain, Italy and the European Union have common concerns with the United States.

He continued: But at the same time, the common interests and geographical location of European governments in the neighborhood of Russia and extensive cooperation with China have prevented them from fully complying with US aggressive policies against China and Russia.

The expert on Europe affairs, noting that European governments are trying to play a balancing role in the US policies with China and Russia said: In fact, their goal is to get good concessions from Moscow and Beijing on the one hand, and to align with the United States as part of their cooperation with China and Russia to prevent the two countries from expanding their influence as serious threats of the 21st century.

Given that in the US National Security Strategy, the Islamic Republic of Iran is the fourth priority, Makki stressed: We are now witnessing changes in the US policy toward Iran and the revival of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Regarding the European policy towards the JCPOA and its alignment with Washington, he said: Although European governments have many common interests with some Arab countries in the region, they also have to work with the United States to revive the JCPOA and pursue a policy of containment of Iran while cooperating with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Noting that in this round of negotiations on the revival of the JCPOA in Vienna, unlike in previous periods, we rarely saw the excessive proposals of Western governments towards Iran, Maki stressed: Earlier, some European countries, such as France and Germany, had made maximum demands with regard to the revival of the JCPOA, such as expanding the JCPOA to the missile issues and regional influence, or even participation of countries such as Saudi Arabia in the talks on the JCPOA, but in recent weeks, due to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s firm stance, we have seen fewer such requests from the European governments.

According to the expert, almost all parties to the JCPOA speak of optimism and a bright future for its revival.

In conclusion, Mackie explained about the position of the Group of Seven on the world arena and said: The Group of Seven, according to the philosophy of this group, which was formed in the 1970s among the Western industrialized countries, no longer has the former position and the Americans, with regard to the change in the international system in the 1970s, are trying to redefine the nature of the Group of Seven and turn the group into a front to contain China.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading