Netanyahu end-game and political instability of Zionist Regime

2021/05/15 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Pointing out to Benjamin Netanyahu’s failure to form a cabinet, and appointment of Yair Lapid, leader of moderate Yesh Atid party to form the cabinet, a middle-east expert said Lapid has the support of 56 seats out of 120 Knesset MPs but in order to form his cabinet, he still needs to make a coalition with other parties.

In his interview with SCFRonline, Ghassem Moheb-Ali said about the decision made by Reuven Rivlin, president of the Zionist Regime to appoint Yair Lapid leader of the moderate party Yesh Atid to form his cabinet:” since Benjamin Netanyahu did not win necessary seats in the recent Knesset election, it was predictable that he would be unable to form his cabinet and his rivals were not ready to make a coalition with him. Thus Netanyahu lost his four-week time to form cabinet”.

Moheb-Ali further emphasized:” Now, Lapid has been given four weeks time beginning from May 5, 2021, to form his cabinet. However, it is not clear if he can win the necessary support and manage to form cabinet”.

Moheb-Ali said about the political future of Netanyahu as such: “ in view of Netanyahu’s situation inside Israel, either for his corruption cases or the new president in the White House ever-since Joe Biden took office, he has no chance to remain in the political scene as the prime minister”.

The expert further added: “it can not be definitely said that Netanyahu would quit the politics”.

Commenting on What will happen if Lapid can not manage to form a cabinet? Moheb-Ali said:” the president should nominate another person or hold a new election”.

On the process of how to form a cabinet and elect the prime minister, the middle-east expert said:” at the first stage, the president will nominate the leader of the party who won the largest number of seats to form a cabinet. If he/she fails, the president would suggest the same to the leader of the second-largest party at Knesset”. He further continued:” As we witnessed, neither Netanyahu nor Lapid could enjoy the majority seats to form a cabinet, thus, they have to make a coalition. Now, Lapid’s party should make coalition either with Netanyahu or smaller parties to win more than 60 seats and form cabinet”.  Moheb-Ali believes, such a cabinet when formed, is fragile and vulnerable. So, it seems unlikely to remain in power for long. Referring to a conceivable coalition with Netanyahu, Moheb-Ali said a national unity government can be formed. He explained if this happens, then the premiership post must be on a mutual agreement basis, i.e. either on a periodical basis or like the last time when Beni Gantz, offered the premiership to Netanyahu and he assumed the Minister of Defence. This may happen again that if the coalition is made with Likud, Lapid may offer the premiership to Netanyahu. The expert pointed out that with president Biden at the White House and Netanyahu’s financial corruption cases, it seems unlikely that he becomes prime minister again.

However, Moheb-Ali said if cabinet forming is prolonged and the situation in the occupied territories suspended, Netanyahu may probably continue his policies against Iran and Arab countries.

Commenting on the role of Palestinian Arabs in cabinet forming, the expert said: “ if they vote for Mr Lapid, Netanyahu will be forced to leave the stage. He further emphasized:” Jews seem not to bow to the demands of Palestinian Arab Muslims and it will be difficult for Jews to compromise with them”.

The expert continued:” less probably, if Mr Lapid makes coalition with Arab Muslims, he will naturally adopt more moderate policies on Palestinians and he must give them concessions to enable Arabs to justify their coalition with Jewish parties and probable new prime minister”.

The expert commented finally on President Biden’s policies on Palestine as saying: “ if the future cabinet to be formed is close to Washington policies, then it will leave a great influence on the regional policies of TelAviv. Because, unlike Trump, Biden is in favour of the two states of Palestine and Israel. In the meantime, he does not support the further inclusion of Palestinian territories to Israel and shows no interest in crisis building of Israeli regime in the region”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading