Turkey’s NATO Strategy

2022/03/02 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Turkey has been a member of NATO for 70 years and, like the Cold War time, it is an active member of the organization. At a time when on the one hand there is talk about NATO 2030 and, on the other hand, we are witnessing comprehensive security tests; Turkey claims that it has played its part in defense and security fields, and that it will continue to make significant contributions to NATO’s transformation process and to its efforts to maintain security and stability, in particular to combat all forms of terrorism that pose a threat not only to Turkey but to the entire Euro-Atlantic geography. Mahmoud Fazeli - International affairs analyst

It is emphasized in the official positions of that country that Turkey will become an essential member of the organization on the 70th anniversary of its membership in NATO and will remain a strong member of it. According to the Turkish Defense Minister, Hulusi Akar, the country, which has become an international subject under the leadership of President Erdogan, has done very important work and achieved great success.

For many years, Turkey boasted of being a NATO base at the forefront, a position that made Turkey an important and strategic member of NATO. But this definition was more valid for the Cold War years. Today, however, the Cold War era is over and it is moving towards completely different global and regional systems. Thus, Turkey’s strategic importance and value for NATO is being redefined.

Of course, Turkey’s policies in NATO have faced ups and downs. One of those problems is Turkey’s cooperation with the United States as two NATO members. Although the United States has complained about the purchase of the S-400 system by Turkey and has threatened it, Erdogan believes that the issue of S-400s is also a very important step between Turkey and Russia.

It should be noted that the United States did not deliver to Turkey some of the equipment paid for by Turkey, especially F-35 fighters. A sum of 1.4 billion dollars was paid to the United States for the purchase of F-35 fighter jets, but they did not deliver the fighter jets and are still taking Turkey’s time.

A group in the United States believes that the purchase of the S-400 from Russia is an unprecedented violation of NATO rules. The Erdogan government’s response to the 2016 coup, disagreements over Syria, criticism of Turkey’s human rights policies, and its anger at the United States have created a serious rift in Turkey’s relations with other NATO members.

On various issues, Erdogan pursues policies contrary to those of the United States and NATO. Turkey’s policy toward Iran, Syria and Iraq, cooperation with Russia, its Black Sea policy, and the new neo-Ottoman claims in the Mediterranean have strained Turkey-US relations. According to this belief, Turkey must stand against the provocation of Russia through the holding of NATO exercises by the United States in the Black Sea and adhere to the approach that “Black Sea is the issue of the Black Sea coastal states”. Turkey should oppose Ukraine and Georgia membership NATO.

As a member of the Western Alliance and as a NATO ally, Turkey will continue to play a role in reducing tensions in having good relations with Russia and Ukraine.

The sale of armed drones to Ukraine provoked a strong reaction from Moscow. Putin currently prefers to reflect this dissatisfaction by quoting his lower-level executives, given the gap he has created in NATO through the sale of S-400 systems to Turkey.

Ties between Turkey and Greece, the two NATO members, have often been strained, with relations deteriorating sharply last year and warships in the eastern Mediterranean clashed with each other over maritime borders and energy rights.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading