Objectives behind the formation of the Yemeni Presiding Leadership Council

2022/04/19 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: Yemeni fugitive President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who according to some media sources is under house arrest by the Saud family in Riyadh, recently fired his deputy, Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar, and handed over his power to an institution called the Presiding Leadership Council. He announced that the council, chaired by Rashad Mohammad Al-Alimi and with seven other members, would take over all the powers of the president and his deputy. Kamran Karami—Researcher of the Arab Peninsula affairs

The Yemeni Presiding Council of  the presidency is a combination of northern and southern forces formed under pressure from Saudi Arabia and in coordination with the United Arab Emirates, and plans to hold political talks with Ansarollah.

North-affiliated figures include Rashad Mohammad al-Alimi, chairman of the Command Council and a member of the Mutmar al-Shabi al-Amm party; Sultan Ali al-Arada is affiliated with the Reform Party, Tariq Muhammad Saleh is affiliated with the Mutmar al-Shabi party and the commander of the West Shore forces, and Osman Hussein Majli is affiliated with the Mutmar al-Shabi party. The four members of the council also include personalities affiliated with the south, who are: Abdul Rahman Abu Zara’a, commander of the Amaleqah forces; Abdullah al-Alimi, a minister affiliated with the Reform Party; Eidroos Qassim al-Zubaidi, speaker of the Southern Transitional Assembly, and Faraj Salmin al-Behsani, affiliated with the Socialist Party.

The composition of this council includes forces loyal to the Saudi coalition, which have lined up against Ansarollah during these seven years with different levels and ranks.

This council is the product of the Yemeni-Yemeni dialogue minus Ansarollah in Riyadh, which was formed on the initiative of the Secretary General of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council from March 30 to April 7 and came into being with the resignation of Mansour Hadi and his deputy, General Mohsen Al-Ahmar. The task of this council is to advance the political negotiations and to manage the current situation in the process of the transitional government, so that the talks can lead to how the government will be established in the post-crisis of Yemen.

But what paved the way for this transfer of power within the coalition was a two-month nationwide ceasefire. In fact, the parties to the Yemeni crisis responded positively to the UN proposal for a two-month ceasefire, which took effect on April 2nd. According to the ceasefire, all ground, air and naval military operations will be stopped. Under the terms of the agreement, 18 fuel-carrying ships will enter the port of Al-Hudaidah, and two flights a week will be allowed to use Sanaa Airport. Other clauses in the agreement include a meeting between the parties to agree on opening crossings in Taiz and other provinces to improve traffic within Yemen.

What is very important and key in this is the composition of this council, which intends to start the conditions of political negotiations with Ansarollah and, more importantly, to provide the grounds for a political transition to an inclusive government in Yemen. This issue, despite the conflicts and conflicts of interest on the coalition front, on the one hand, and on the other hand, in relation to Ansarollah, has various ambiguities and complexities.

The presence of Eidroos al-Zubaidi, the speaker of the Southern Transitional Assembly, who has had a wide-ranging conflict of interest with Mansour Hadi and the Reform Party over the past two years over how to govern the southern provinces, is one of the ambiguities of how the inclusive government should bring its conflicting interests to the level of symmetry with the coalition and Ansarollah in the coming political prospect and under the supposition of the formation of an inclusive government, especially since the power of the South and the strong separatist and centrifugal tendencies within them, which go back to before the unification in the 1990s and the post-union political events, will be the Achilles heel of this council and any political agreement.

On the other hand, assuming that there is unity within the council and following a clear agenda for negotiations with Ansarollah – which should first lead to the reopening of ports and airports, as well as political dialogue in a neutral country; How to manage the political negotiations that shape the inclusive government with Ansarollah’s presence is a difficult and complex and perhaps in a sense impossible mission that does not fit with the Yemeni field equations and the division of spheres of influence.

How to share power, divide positions, share the budget, hand over weapons and formulate the security and foreign policy of the future government are ambiguities that make achieving the idea of ​​an inclusive government with the presence of all Yemeni groups more like a joke. Although this council seems to be the product of the formation of a political reality among the Saudis that the strategy of military aggression failed and the crisis eroded in order to break the resistance and resilience of Ansarollah and its allies, Riyadh is trying to convert the burden of war and conflict in Yemen to Yemeni-Yemeni confrontations. In addition, the complexities of the Yemeni political scene will turn the political negotiation process into a long and erosive one.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading