loader image

President’s Latin America Tour, Importance of “Scientific & Technological Diplomacy”

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran to three Latin American countries is considered one of the “very important” foreign policy events. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on international affairs

The importance and geopolitical, geo-economic, and geostrategic position of Latin America, especially Venezuela, in the world on the one hand, and domestic, regional, and international consequences of the expansion of Iran’s strategic relations with Latin America on the other hand, have added to the importance of the president’s tour.

The trip is important from various dimensions and includes strategic consequences, some of which are as follows:

One, since the departure of the colonial governments of Spain, Portugal, Britain, and France from Latin America, the United States considers this region as its “backyard.” A major part of the problems that existed in Latin America in the past decades and still continue in some countries was caused by the colonial interventions of the United States. The Pinochet coup in Chile, the Contra war in Nicaragua, and the death squads in El Salvador are among the darkest periods in the history of Latin America, in which the United States played a major role in their occurrence in the form of the “Monroe Doctrine.”

Over the past two decades, US influence in Latin America has been declining. The region’s countries increasingly act “independent” of the US and its interests. Distancing from the US and half of the countries, “anti-Americanism” is becoming a dominant “approach.” At present, half of the countries of Latin America and more than 80 percent of its area are made up of anti-American governments. Today, the Biden administration is heavily criticized for its policies’ ineffectiveness and unfavorable performance in Latin America.

At the same time, the interest of the countries of that region at governmental and non-governmental levels to expand strategic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was clearly evident in the recent visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, is an issue that is very difficult for the Americans to accept.

The reaction of the US government to Mr. Raeisi’s trip to Latin America, manifested in the statements of John Kirby, Coordinator for Strategic Communications at the National Security Council in the White House, clearly shows the “strategic importance” of that trip.

For the US, the development of political, economic, and discourse influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran near the borders and, so to speak, in its backyard is a “fundamental challenge”; to a country that has been seeking to contain the Islamic Resistance Front for many years in West Asia, is now witnessing the expansion of the depth and scope of the “anti-imperialist discourse” which has many aspects in common with the “resistance discourse.”

Two, Latin America is a wealthy region in terms of land and underground resources, and this has made it play an increasing role and importance in the post-Cold War period and has attracted the attention of major regional and international powers.

For example, Venezuela, one of Iran’s partners in Latin America, has vast resources that, due to infrastructure problems, sanctions, and lack of new technologies, cannot exploit all of them. This is considered a unique “opportunity” for the Islamic Republic of Iran to increase its “strategic depth” in that region while raising the level of bilateral relations as a win-win equation.

Currently, Iran’s exports to Venezuela amount to 3 billion dollars, which is more than the US exports to that country! In the recent visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the goal setting for 1404 (2025) was defined as more than 20 billion dollars. In the past three years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has significantly increased its cooperation with Venezuela in the field of energy, including offshore refineries and the shipment of heavy crude oil.

Three, Iran’s view of Latin America and its countries is mainly “geo-economic” and economic rather than ideological and security. Therefore, the economy is the most important field of Iran’s relations with some countries in that region. In the new era, the Islamic Republic of Iran seeks to improve its geo-economic position in Latin America’s existing and potential value chains.

Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua are the foundations of Iran’s “geopolitical balance” in the Latin American region, and strengthening the “geo-economic aspects” of relations with those countries, especially in the economic, commercial, and infrastructure dimensions, is an “undeniable necessity.”

Of course, the expansion of relations between Iran and three Latin American countries based on geo-economic components cannot mean ignoring other dimensions, including the “geopolitical” and “ideological” fields. In any case, it should be emphasized that confronting the US unilateralism in the world is one of the important priorities of Iran’s foreign policy, which cannot be ignored.

Four; In the end, it is necessary to pay attention to two important points: First, in addition to Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, other important countries in Latin America have discursive and historical similarities with the Islamic Republic of Iran in terms of idealism, civilizational and cultural ties, anti-colonial and anti-arrogance struggles, as well as having outstanding symbols and personalities, resistance and standing.

The growing trend of left-wing governments coming to power, including in Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, etc., which has strengthened the “block of anti-imperialist countries” in Latin America, is a good opportunity to be seriously considered in deepening and expanding Iran’s strategic interactions with those countries.

Secondly, the Islamic Republic of Iran has important capacities in various “science and technology fields.” It is one of the leading countries in the world in some areas of industrial technology, nuclear, space, nano, stem cells, medicine, etc.

This is a “unique opportunity” for the Islamic Republic of Iran and some Latin American countries, which are very rich in terms of natural resources and raw materials, but weak in terms of scientific and industrial facilities and technologies, to exploit their resources for the realization of “strategic cooperation.”

Considering this importance, and since establishing international scientific and technological cooperation in today’s world is of great importance and necessity, what should be regarded as a priority in developing strategic collaboration with Latin America today is “scientific and technology diplomacy.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading