Corona: Undermining Liberal Order, Bolstering Power Politics Order

Strategic Council Online: A faculty member of the Institute for Strategic Studies said that the conditions and requirements the corona disease has created for the immediate intervention of governments in the internal affairs of the people are to the detriment of individual and social freedoms. He added: The coronavirus may weaken or even be destroyed by vaccines, but its effects on human, community, and government relationships appear to be sustained.

Mehdi Shapouri, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, stated that corona epidemic is one of the complications of globalization: “Before corona, the world had never experienced globalization in such a horrible way.” It was and is believed that globalization has brought societies closer and closer together, and that this process will continue. An important consequence of the corona outbreak is that it disrupts ties and engages people, communities and governments within their own confines.

Corona Caused Major Disruptions in Globalization Chain

He added: “Globalization has diminished the importance of borders, but corona has closed borders and highlighted the status of the frontiers as a symbol of segregation in human-community relations.”Globalization has globalized both the supply chain and the production distribution chain, but corona has created major disruptions in these chains.”

The strategic affairs analyst said that the coronavirus may be weakened or even destroyed against vaccination, but its effects on human-community relations and societies appear to be stable. If the corona disease is defeated, the fear of another corona will no longer allow human beings and societies to be as intertwined as they were in the past, or at least to go beyond the connections and interconnections of the past.

Shapouri continued: “This transformation means a pause or even the end of globalization, which means the fading or disappearance of territorial, social, cultural, economic and political boundaries between societies and governments.” Accordingly, the corona phenomenon is likely to increase the growth of political introversion and the economic protectionism of governments. Meantime, governments will focus more on their internal affairs and plan for situations where they are forced to live without communication or with minimal communication with others.

The faculty member of the Institute for Strategic Studies said that more government focus on domestic issues requires fundamental changes in their policies and priorities that could create a different world than before corona.

Corona Requirements Contrary to Principles of Liberal International Order

“Corona has also created the conditions and requirements for the immediate intervention of governments in their internal affairs to the detriment of individual and social freedoms,” he said. The state of emergency caused by the corona epidemic has created conditions for individuals and communities to call for more government intervention and control, which could eventually lead to the growth of political power. The sum of these developments is contrary to the principles and rules of the liberal international order, including democracy, the free market, and the minimal government that the United States and its allies have worked hard to shape since World War II.

At the same time, Shapouri noted that the basic principles and rules of liberal order were seriously challenged before corona outbreak with the Trump administration coming to power, and his administration’s policies and actions. He added: “Under these conditions the outbreak of the corona virus accelerates the undermining of international liberal order. If the virus continues to spread and Trump is re-elected President of the United States in this year’s polls, the liberal order is likely to face more fundamental challenges.

He stressed: “It seems that the alternative order of the liberal order, apart from what it may look like, which depends on the distribution of capabilities among the main actors of the international system, will be based on the components of ‘power politics’. Unlike liberal order, which is somewhat law-abiding and restricts the use of force, order based on “power politics” is force-oriented, and the threat or use of military force to resolve international disputes is the main basis for such an order. .

Shapouri added: “The basic rule in the order based on power politics is that the powerful do what they can, and the weak have to accept what they can’t change.” The threats of order based on power politics for Iran are far greater than its opportunities. In such an order, the most powerful international actors determine the rules and procedures; the international scene is turned into a game of these powers, and the independence of action and the role of regional powers becomes limited and goes under the shadow of the main powers is the international system.

The strategic affairs expert said: “In periods when such an order prevailed, the interests of the weaker actors have been trampled on or compromised by the main powers.” A clear example of this is the rivalry between the British, Russian and, to some extent, the French colonial powers in Iran in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, in which Iran repeatedly becomes the scapegoat to competition and compromise.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading