Objectives of Joint Communication on Strategic Partnership between Persian Gulf Cooperation Council (PGCC) & the European Union

2022/07/08 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Having stated that signing of Joint Communication on Strategic Partnership is the reflection of European leaders’ concern about expansion of ties among countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council with China and particularly Russia at present junction, an expert of West Asia Affairs said:” Joint Communication on Strategic Partnership may prepare a more suitable ground for increased security presence of Europeans in the Persian Gulf region in future”.

Arash Saffaar in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations pointed out to signing of the Joint Communication on the EU Strategic Partnership with the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and noted:” the Joint Communication covers a wide range of issues such as stability and security in the region, energy security in global market, cultural cooperation in scientific and exchange of students fields, and the green energies. What boosts the importance of the Joint Communication is its coincidence with some international developments through which we witness the expansion of ties of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries with China, Russia and consequences of Ukraine war”.

 

Europe’s Concerns about the expansion of Relations of the Persian Gulf Countries with China and Russia

Having stated that signing of the Joint Communication is the reflection of the EU leaders’ concern about the expansion of ties among countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council with China and particularly Russia at present junction, he continued:” the countries of the PGCC already had extensive relations with Europe and although the ties may boost but it can not be said that from now on, new areas in their relations will be established in the light of the said Joint Communication”.

Having referred to the trade volume of Europe with PGCC countries, the analyst of the West Asia Affairs said:” the EU Representation Office was opened in Qatar several years ago. It is possible that within the coming months, another similar office will be opened in Oman. The European Union had also nominated an ambassador to work with the PGCC countries”.

Having stated that the capability to advance such a wide range of topics from both sides is a noticeable issue, he said:” the EU has not revealed any roadmap to translate such issues from words to deeds, and it is not clear that how such a wide range of ambitious objectives are going to go ahead? In the meantime, there are some diverging issues among the PGCC countries and the EU like human rights as well as women rights-related issues”.

Saffaar emphasized:” naturally, such issues can not be discussed in Arab countries of the region and European values too can not be realized within the framework of these talks either and or probable reforms that Europeans expect could be proceeded in these countries”.

The expert of West Asia Affairs commented on the consequences of signing the Joint Communication on Strategic Partnership with Europe and spelled out:” Because of War in Ukraine and in view of the EU sanctions against Russia, the PGCC countries have the potential to supply a part of fossil fuel requirements of Europe. On the other hand, the PGCC countries have an ambitious plan to step towards economies in which carbon use will be sharply decreased and renewable energies will be increased; the EU has some international commitments within the framework of Paris Agreement in this connection. The issue can prepare ground for cooperation”.

He stated in short term, one can not witness a major and remarkable development in relations between the Persian Gulf countries and Europe and or the regional equations originated from the Joint Communication on Strategic Partnership. He said:” in view of the developments at international level and also developments in the region’s security order, the Joint Communication could be of importance in long term and has security consequences in future. In fact, the Joint Communication may prepare a more suitable ground for increased security presence of Europeans in the Persian Gulf region. In view of the interests Europe follows in the region, such presence will create a situation different from what we are witnessing during the U.S. presence”.

 

Unchanged Strategy of the PGCC in Its Relations with China & Russia

Having commented on the effect of the Joint Communication with the EU and their demands from the leaders of the PGCC countries to distance from China and Russia, the expert of the West Asia Affairs expressed:” It does not seem that the EU could hinder the expansion of relations of the PGCC countries with China and Russia to the extent it expects and makes any change in their long term strategy. EU countries have a certain number of demands and they believe the East can supply them. As long as we witness a dynamic and growing economy in China that can supply the development requirements of the PGCC countries, the inclination will not disappear”.

Saffaar continued:” the PGCC countries have shown that they have such a diplomatic and political capability as well as flexibility that they can coordinate their conflicting interests in relations with the East and the West. Therefore, despite pressures exerted on them by the U.S. and Europe to prevent the expansion of their relations with China and Russia, yet it can not raise a serious impediment. They see the East like the West as a political reality. Having enjoyed with balanced relations with the East and the West offers them to have more diplomatic momentum and greater chance to follow up their interests”.

Having referred to anti-Iranian stances included in the Joint Communication, such as Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and its missile-defensive activities, he said:” although both sides have concerns on these issues, but there are differences in their strategy. The European Union is very much interested in concluding negotiations and achieving an agreement, but the PGCC countries have different outlook towards the negotiations collectively and individually”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Hamas Approach to US Ceasefire Plan

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Palestinian issues said: What is being discussed about the ceasefire plans is not necessarily the issue of stopping the war in Gaza and the exchange of prisoners, but the important issue of formulating the post-war status for each of the two sides.

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Hamas Approach to US Ceasefire Plan

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Palestinian issues said: What is being discussed about the ceasefire plans is not necessarily the issue of stopping the war in Gaza and the exchange of prisoners, but the important issue of formulating the post-war status for each of the two sides.

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

Loading