Hope & Doubts in Turkey – US Relations

2022/05/01 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Ankara considers the new trend in normalization of its relations with UAE, Saudi Arabia, the Zionist regime and its policy with regard to Ukraine crisis as a new step in its foreign policy. Mahmoud Faazeli, Analyst of International Issues

It goes without saying that the trend of normalization and U-turn in Erdogan’s position and his foreign policy is impressed by Turkey’s economic crisis and its destructive effects in internal sphere. Despite Ankara’s support to Ukraine and staying away from sanctions announced on Russia, Turkey’s intention to normalize its relations with the U.S. indicates a change in the country’s strategic policy.

Having been host to hold Ukraine – Russia talks in Istanbul, Ankara tries to finally arrange a get together between Putin and Zelensky in Turkey. If the objective realizes, Erdogan will bring about a winning card at the regional as well as internal level of his country.

Turkey heralds the beginning of a strategic mechanism between itself and the U.S. The decision was first announced in the course of the meeting between Sedat Unal, Deputy Foreign Minister of Turkey and Victoria Nuland, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs of the United States. Within the framework of her tour to Greece, Cyprus and Turkey, Nuland expressed the purpose of her visit as to further strengthen of bilateral relations, to stress on supporting Ukraine and to coordinate the efforts against Russia because of Ukraine crisis.

In addition to her assessment of the meeting between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul, Nuland and her accompanying delegation reviewed other issues related to the war between Russia and Ukraine, Syria, Azerbaijan, Armenia and the Zionist regime, security of energy, defensive cooperation as well as political and economic aspects of bilateral relations in her meeting with İbrahim Kalın, Turkish Presidential Spokesman and his Foreign Policy and Security Advisor.

From Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs of the United States’ point of view, friendly relations of Erdogan with Zelensky and Putin was effective in holding the peace talks in Turkey, that provides confidence building atmosphere to put an end to war. 

He said:” authority and geographical situation of Turkey in Black Sea is very important. Black Sea could serve as a transit route in the war that fortunately Turkey did not let it happen. In the talks we had with the Turkish government, they said that they were really sensitive to this issue, and they did not let sanctions imposed on Russia be violated through Turkish territory. Cooperation with each other is important at this stage. As a NATO member, Turkey decided to buy air defense systems and weaponry from Russia. This is a matter of concern to us. Both Turkish government and its citizens have clearly noticed that when they buy air defense systems from Russia, as it is witnessed in Ukraine, the weapons will not give any advantage to Turkey in the battlefield. On F-16 fighters, we are negotiating and waiting for Turkey’s demands in this respect. Negotiations on F-16s continue with Turkey, but we have not achieved any result yet”.

The U.S. Department of State sent a letter to the Congress about the selling of F-16 fighters to Turkey by Biden’s Administration, in which it has been mentioned that probable selling of F-16 fighters to Turkey will be in line with the U.S. national security interests and also will serve NATO long term unity. Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey assessed the letter on the selling of fighters to Turkey in the U.S. as positive. Evidences indicate that the demand is being studied by Defensive Security Cooperation Agency (relevant body for the export of the U.S. military equipment), under the title of External Military Selling”.

Simultaneously, several selected members of the Congress opposed the selling of the fighters. Likewise, ten anti – Turkey groups stationed in the U.S. have launched # Don’t Sell Jets to Turkey # campaign to prevent the selling of F-16 fighters to the country. The Campaign demands the U.S. Administration to observe international laws and do not sell F-16 fighters to Turkey. Among the supporting groups of the Campaign, the Greco – US Leadership Council, the U.S. National Committee of Armenians, International Coordinating Committee – Justice for Cyprus (PSEKA), California Greco – US Council can be mentioned”.

Greece Foreign Minister also believes:” although Turkey is a NATO member, but it has repeatedly threatened Greece; therefore, Turkey should stop threatening our country with war. Greece is not happy with buying military weapons by Turkey because under certain conditions, Greece may be the target of these weapons. Obviously, we have already announced to the American side that under which conditions we would agree with the selling of these weapons to Turkey. Today, our position which is originated from long-lasting principles of the foreign policy of our country has not changed. Under the pressure from Ukraine crisis, the U.S. raised some viewpoints but Greece’s considerations will continue to preserve”.

Simultaneously, some news is circulated that radars and missiles of Greek fighters have the capability to reconnaissance Turkish fighters and to attack them before pilots understand, therefore, it is necessary for Turkey to upgrade its F-16 squadrons. The upgrade is being made in Greece but has not been made in Turkey, and if the balance of power in Aegean Sea is removed, there is a greater chance for Turkish defeat in dogfights. Even the claim has been raised that if the U.S. Congress refused the selling of F-16 fighters to the country, Turkey may review the buying of Russian made Sokhoi-57 to replace them. Ankara has demanded Washington for 40 F-16 fighter jets and their upgrade.

Relations between Turkey and the U.S. turned sour as of 2019 due to deletion of Turkey from the selling program of the U.S. made F-35 fighters under the pretext of purchasing Russian made S-400 systems. Ankara planned to buy 100 F-35 fighters to modernize its Air Force but by buying S-400 missile defense systems from Russia by Ankara, now Turkey is looking for buying new fighters from other suppliers. Having challenged the decision repeatedly, Erdogan has now dealt with the reality and has demanded the repayment of $ 1.4 billion invested to buy F-35s.

The demand also included the modernization of 80 F-16 fighters in Turkey’s Air Force squadrons. In his telephone conversation with President Biden on March 10, 2022 and having referred that he would expect Turkey’s demand including the purchase of 40 new version of F-16 fighters from the U.S., and modernization of F-16 fighters would be finalized as soon as possible, Erdogan emphasized that time was ripe to lift the unjust sanctions imposed on Turkey in defense industries field.

While Turkish Foreign Minister will pay a visit to the U.S. on May 18, 2022 to meet his counterpart Anthony Blinken, the issue of selling F-35s continues to be a disputed matter between the two countries. Spokesman of the U.S. Department of State believes that Turkey is an important NATO ally and there have been a number of meetings exchanged between the two foreign ministers recently. Turkey has an important role to consider Russia as responsible in its war against Ukraine. That’s why Çavuşoğlu’s visit to Washington is considered as an opportunity.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading