Roots of Shift in Turkish Government’s Regional Approach

2022/05/01 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The outbreak of the so-called Arab Spring was an opportunity for Turkey to present itself prominently in the Middle East for the first time since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Fatemeh Nekoolal Azad - Expert on international affairs

Turkey, which had previously given priority to the West, suddenly turned to the Middle East. By supporting the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated political currents in Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Libya and even Palestine, it sought to establish itself in the Middle East and, on the other hand, considered its political-economic model a suitable model for The Arab countries of the Middle East that either their political systems had been changed or their political systems were prone to change or were changing.

This policy of Turkey caused tensions in its relations with other countries in the region. Support for the Muslim Brotherhood placed Turkey against countries such as the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and the Egyptian army, which have historically been considered as hostile to the Muslim Brotherhood. Also, supporting the Palestinian Brotherhood and giving them an office in Ankara and taking critical positions against the Zionist regime, intensified tension in relations between Turkey and the Zionist regime. In addition, Turkey’s efforts for the Muslim Brotherhood to seize power in Syria had caused great concern for the Zionist regime.

At first, Erdogan’s government was very happy with the victory of the Brotherhood in countries such as Egypt, and along with the Qatari government, continued to fully support the Brotherhood in the region. But the fall of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, a leading member of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, which was met with an immediate response from the UAE and Saudi Arabia, provoked strong opposition from Turkey. Turkey called the new Egyptian government led by al-Sisi a coup government and refused to recognize it.

Following the weakening of the position of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, especially after the 2013 military coup, the Palestinian Brotherhood was also weakened. In Syria, meanwhile, Turkish-backed currents were gradually weakened with the Syrian government re-establishing sovereignty over the country. Therefore, Turkey, which was previously in an offensive position, was in a defensive position after the mentioned developments, which culminated in a failed coup against Erdogan and the siege of Qatar by some Arab states bordering the Persian Gulf with the support of Egypt. With the victory of Joe Biden in the US elections, which was strongly critical of Erdogan’s approach, Turkey became more and more defensive and even weak.

This situation forced Turkey to change its policies. In fact, on the one hand, the Turkish government did not have good relations internationally with Europe and the United States, and at the regional level, it did not have good relations with governments such as Egypt, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime, and on the other hand it was under economic pressure. Therefore, Turkey changed its policy with a pragmatic approach. That is to say, at the international level, it cautiously sided with NATO against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and at the regional level, it began a policy of normalizing relations with regional governments.

Turkey’s new policy, especially at the regional level, has several serious consequences:

First, the Muslim Brotherhood in the region has lost and is losing one of its main regional supporters. While the leaders of the Brotherhood movement in Egypt are sentenced to severe punishments such as execution and life imprisonment, the Palestinian Brotherhood movements face the acceptance of the Zionist regime by some Arab regimes, and the Brotherhood movement in Syria is in a position of weakness. The new Turkish policy will be a bitter incident for the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, lack of regional support can plunge the Brotherhood into a political coma for years.

Second, it is possible that the political-military situation in the Arab countries involved in the internal crisis will move towards relative stability. Turkey’s lack or reduction of support for the Brotherhood in the region discourages them from continuing their struggle against the relevant political systems.

Third, it is possible that in the light of normalization of Zionist regime-Turkey and Turkey-Egypt relations, Ankara will try to normalize Arab-Zionist regime and possibly Palestinian-Zionist regime relations in order to gain a foothold in the region and even in the United States.

Fourth, in the light of the normalizations that have taken place, Turkey may enter into cooperative arrangements with those that have entered the process of normalization of relations. For example, Murat Mercan, the Turkish ambassador to the United States, said about the recent normalizations in Turkish relations that the Zionist regime and Turkey can jointly cooperate against “terrorism and malicious countries”.

Fifth, Turkey, by turning away from supporting the Brotherhood in the region in order to facilitate normalization of relations with some countries in the region, Qatar, as another supporter of the movement in the region, may adjust its position towards them.

In conclusion, it should be said that one of the most important reasons for the US Democrats’ opposition to Turkey is Ankara’s regional policies, especially in support of the Brotherhood, which, in the light of normalization developments with some governments in the region, can also put Washington-Ankara relationship on the path of improvement. Thus, Turkey’s recent move, which is in a way acknowledgment of the failure of past policies or a retreat from it, brings Turkey closer to the United States internationally and, at the regional level, strengthens the current that seeks to normalize relations with the Zionist regime. In other words, it can be concluded that the new approach of the Turkish government in the region is a step towards securing the interests of the Zionist regime and ignoring the Palestinian cause.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر